CVE-2022-23530 is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.8) Path Traversal vulnerability in guarddog. 2 public exploit or proof-of-concept references are indexed, so weaponization risk is real. A fix is available for guarddog — see the affected versions and patch details below.
GuardDog vulnerable to arbitrary file write when scanning a specially-crafted remote PyPI package
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2022-23530.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
Where this sits among everything scored
Real-World Exposure
guarddogReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
Unsafe extracting using shutil.unpack_archive() from a remotely retrieved tarball may lead to writing the extracted file to an unintended destination.
Details
Extracting files using shutil.unpack_archive() from a potentially malicious tarball without validating that the destination file path is within the intended destination directory can cause files outside the destination directory to be overwritten.
The vulnerable code snippet is between L153..158.
response = requests.get(url, stream=True)
with open(zippath, "wb") as f:
f.write(response.raw.read())
shutil.unpack_archive(zippath, unzippedpath)
It seems that a remotely retrieved tarball which could be with the extension .tar.gz happens to be unpacked using shutil.unpack_archive() with no destination verification/limitation of the extracted files.
PoC
The PoC provided showcases the risk of extracting the non-harmless text file sim4n6.txt to a parent location rather than the current folder.
> tar --list -f archive.tar
tar: Removing leading `../../../' from member names
../../../sim4n6.txt
> python3
Python 3.10.6 (main, Nov 2 2022, 18:53:38) [GCC 11.3.0] on linux
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import shutil
>>> shutil.unpack_archive("archive.tar")
>>> exit()
> file ../../../sim4n6.txt
../../../sim4n6.txt: ASCII text
A Potential Attack Scenario
- An attacker may craft a malicious tarball with a filename path, such as
../../../../../../../../etc/passwd, and then serve the archive remotely, thus, providing a possibility to overwrite the system files.
Mitigation
Potential mitigation could be to:
- Use a safer module, like
zipfile. - Validate the location of the extracted files and discard those with malicious paths such as a relative path
..or absolute ones.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | guarddog | all versions | 0.1.8pip install --upgrade 'guarddog==0.1.8' |
Affected Products
guarddogdatadoghqResearch use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for guarddog, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update guarddog to 0.1.8 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2022-23530 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Resolve every user-supplied path to its canonical form and reject anything that escapes the intended directory, and run the component under an account that has no read or write access outside the directory it legitimately serves.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2022-23530 in your dependencies?
Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.