NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹
🐹 Go
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

CVE-2018-16886 — etcd

HIGHFix: etcd-io/etcd#10366

CVE-2018-16886 is a high-severity (CVSS 8.1) Improper Authentication vulnerability in go.etcd.io/etcd/v3. A fix is available for go.etcd.io/etcd/v3 — see the affected versions and patch details below.

go.etcd.io/etcd Authentication Bypass

Also known asGHSA-h6xx-pmxh-3wgpGO-2021-0077
Published
Updated
Affected
3 pkgs
Patched
3 / 3
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Nov 3, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
4.1%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs91th percentile — riskier than 91% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%1.71%3.42%5.14%0.5%4.1%May 26Sep 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

Where this sits among everything scored

Real-World Exposure

3 pkgs affected
🐹go.etcd.io/etcd/v3🐹go.etcd.io/etcd/v3🐹go.etcd.io/etcd

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

etcd versions 3.2.x before 3.2.26 and 3.3.x before 3.3.11 are vulnerable to an improper authentication issue when role-based access control (RBAC) is used and client-cert-auth is enabled. If an etcd client server TLS certificate contains a Common Name (CN) which matches a valid RBAC username, a remote attacker may authenticate as that user with any valid (trusted) client certificate in a REST API request to the gRPC-gateway.

Affected Packages

3 total 3 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogo.etcd.io/etcd/v3≥ 3.2.0&&< 3.2.263.2.26go get go.etcd.io/etcd/v3@v3.2.26
🐹Gogo.etcd.io/etcd/v3≥ 3.3.0&&< 3.3.113.3.11go get go.etcd.io/etcd/v3@v3.3.11
🐹Gogo.etcd.io/etcdall versions0.5.0-alpha.5.0.20190108173120-83c051b701d3go get go.etcd.io/etcd@v0.5.0-alpha.5.0.20190108173120-83c051b701d3

Affected Products

5 products · 6 configurations
Application
etcdetcd
≥ 3.3.0 && < 3.3.11
range
OS
fedorafedoraproject
1 version
30
OS
enterprise linux desktopredhat
1 version
7.0
OS
enterprise linux serverredhat
1 version
7.0
OS
enterprise linux workstationredhat
1 version
7.0

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for go.etcd.io/etcd/v3, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update go.etcd.io/etcd/v3 to 3.2.26 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2018-16886 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Put an independent control in front of the weakness: restrict the affected endpoint or interface to trusted networks, require an additional authentication factor or proxy-level check, and invalidate existing sessions and credentials in case the flaw has already been used.

Fixing This On Your OS

If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.

Red HatModerate

OpenShift Container Platform 3.x, and 4.1 versions do not use etcd Role-based access control so they are not affected.

Workaround published by Red Hat
Ensure that the client server TLS certificate (specified in --cert-file argument or ETCD_CERT_FILE environment variable) does not include a CN (Common Name) field. If a Common Name field is part of this certificate, replace it with one which omits it. To check the CN field of a certificate: openssl x509 -noout -subject -in /path/to/client.crt | grep -o 'CN.*' To check if there is a username matching the CN field in the TLS client certificate: etcdctl user get <TLS client certificate CN> For more information on TLS authentication features including how client-cert-auth is enabled, refer to the etcd transport security model documentation:…
Source: Red Hat security advisory for CVE-2018-16886 (CC BY 4.0)
ProductFixed inAdvisory
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Extrasetcd-0:3.2.26-1.el7RHSA-2019:1352

Frequently Asked Questions

etcd versions 3.2.x before 3.2.26 and 3.3.x before 3.3.11 are vulnerable to an improper authentication issue when role-based access control (RBAC) is used and client-cert-auth is enabled. If an etcd client server TLS certificate contains a Common Name (CN) which matches a valid RBAC username, a remote attacker may authenticate as that user with any valid (trusted) client certificate in a REST API request to the gRPC-gateway.
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2018-16886 in your dependencies?

Find it across Go, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2018-16886: etcd Auth Bypass — Fixed in 3.2.26