Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
☕
☕ Maven
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

CVE-2016-9879 — spring-security-core

HIGH

CVE-2016-9879 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) CWE-417 vulnerability in org.springframework.security:spring-security-core. A fix is available for org.springframework.security:spring-security-core — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Security Constraint Bypass in Spring Security

Also known asGHSA-v35c-49j6-q8hq
Published
Updated
Affected
3 pkgs
Patched
3 / 3
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Oct 10, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
1.5%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk+0.04%
Lower risk than most CVEs73th percentile — riskier than 73% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.65%1.30%1.96%0.3%1.5%Apr 26Aug 26Oct 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

CVE-2016-9879 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 385,738 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.

Real-World Exposure

3 pkgs affected
☕org.springframework.security:spring-security-core☕org.springframework.security:spring-security-core☕org.springframework.security:spring-security-core

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Maven packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Spring Security does not consider URL path parameters when processing security constraints. By adding a URL path parameter with an encoded "/" to a request, an attacker may be able to bypass a security constraint. The root cause of this issue is a lack of clarity regarding the handling of path parameters in the Servlet Specification (see below). Some Servlet containers include path parameters in the value returned for getPathInfo() and some do not. Spring Security uses the value returned by getPathInfo() as part of the process of mapping requests to security constraints. The unexpected presence of path parameters can cause a constraint to be bypassed.

Users of Apache Tomcat (all current versions) are not affected by this vulnerability since Tomcat follows the guidance previously provided by the Servlet Expert group and strips path parameters from the value returned by getContextPath(), getServletPath() and getPathInfo() [1].

Users of other Servlet containers based on Apache Tomcat may or may not be affected depending on whether or not the handling of path parameters has been modified.

Users of IBM WebSphere Application Server 8.5.x are known to be affected.

Users of other containers that implement the Servlet specification may be affected.

[1] https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25015

Affected Pivotal Products and Versions

Severity is high unless otherwise noted.

  • Spring Security 3.2.0 - 3.2.9
  • Spring Security 4.0.x - 4.1.3
  • Spring Security 4.2.0
  • Older unsupported versions are also affected

Mitigation

Adopting one of the following mitigations will protect against this vulnerability.

  • Use a Servlet container known not to include path parameters in the return values for getServletPath() and getPathInfo()
  • Upgrading to Spring Security 3.2.10, 4.1.4 or 4.2.1 will reject the request with a RequestRejectedException if the presence of an encoded "/" is detected. Note: If you wish to disable this feature it can be disabled by setting the DefaultHttpFirewall.allowUrlEncodedSlash = true. However, disabling this feature will mean applications are vulnerable (in containers that return path parameters in getServletPath() or getPathInfo()).

Credit

The issue was identified by Shumpei Asahara & Yuji Ito from NTT DATA Corporation and responsibly reported to Pivotal.

Affected Packages

3 total 3 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
☕Mavenorg.springframework.security:spring-security-coreall versions3.2.10.RELEASEorg.springframework.security:spring-security-core:3.2.10.RELEASE
☕Mavenorg.springframework.security:spring-security-core≥ 4.0.0.RELEASE&&< 4.1.4.RELEASE4.1.4.RELEASEorg.springframework.security:spring-security-core:4.1.4.RELEASE
☕Mavenorg.springframework.security:spring-security-core≥ 4.2.0.RELEASE&&< 4.2.1.RELEASE4.2.1.RELEASEorg.springframework.security:spring-security-core:4.2.1.RELEASE

Affected Products

2 products · 28 configurations
Application
websphere application serveribm
13 versions
8.5.0.08.5.0.18.5.0.28.5.5.08.5.5.18.5.5.28.5.5.38.5.5.48.5.5.58.5.5.68.5.5.78.5.5.8
Application
spring securityvmware
15 versions
3.2.03.2.13.2.23.2.33.2.43.2.53.2.63.2.73.2.83.2.94.1.04.1.1

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for org.springframework.security:spring-security-core, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update org.springframework.security:spring-security-core to 3.2.10.RELEASE or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2016-9879 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

Fixing This On Your OS

If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.

Red HatModerate
Workaround published by Red Hat
Use a Servlet container known not to include path parameters in the return values for getServletPath() and getPathInfo()
Source: Red Hat security advisory for CVE-2016-9879 (CC BY 4.0)

Frequently Asked Questions

Spring Security does not consider URL path parameters when processing security constraints. By adding a URL path parameter with an encoded "/" to a request, an attacker may be able to bypass a security constraint. The root cause of this issue is a lack of clarity regarding the handling of path parameters in the Servlet Specification (see below). Some Servlet containers include path parameters in the value returned for getPathInfo() and some do not. Spring Security uses the value returned by getPathInfo() as part of the process of mapping requests to security constraints. The unexpected presenc
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2016-9879 in your dependencies?

Find it across Maven, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2016-9879: spring-security-core — Fix Available