Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦 npm

GHSA-xxpj-q764-9r6q

NocoDB: Missing Ownership Check in MCP Attachment Read

Also known asCVE-2026-47388
Published
Jun 5, 2026
Updated
Jul 20, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.2%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk11th percentile0.00%
0.00%0.24%0.47%0.71%0.2%0.2%Jul 26Jul 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

1 pkg affected

Weekly download volume for affected packages — a proxy for how broadly this vulnerability is deployed.

nocodbnpm
3Kdownloads / week

Description

Summary

A low-privilege MCP token holder with knowledge of an attachment path could read any file in shared storage, including attachments belonging to other bases and workspaces, because the MCP readAttachment tool did not verify the file's ownership.

Details

The MCP readAttachment tool accepts caller-supplied path/url values and streams the file via the storage adapter. The handler now looks up the path in nc_file_references and requires a non-deleted row whose base_id matches the caller's MCP context before streaming; otherwise it returns Attachment is not accessible from this MCP context. The lookup tolerates both download/uploads/... and uploads/... styles.

Impact

Arbitrary read against shared storage scoped to attachments the caller's MCP context should not see. Exploitation requires an MCP token and a known attachment path.

Credit

This issue was reported by @helwor-01.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npmnocodball versions2026.05.1

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for nocodb. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update nocodb to 2026.05.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-xxpj-q764-9r6q is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-xxpj-q764-9r6q is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-xxpj-q764-9r6q. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary A low-privilege MCP token holder with knowledge of an attachment path could read any file in shared storage, including attachments belonging to other bases and workspaces, because the MCP `readAttachment` tool did not verify the file's ownership. ### Details The MCP `readAttachment` tool accepts caller-supplied `path`/`url` values and streams the file via the storage adapter. The handler now looks up the path in `nc_file_references` and requires a non-deleted row whose `base_id` matches the caller's MCP context before streaming; otherwise it returns `Attachment is not accessible f
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-xxpj-q764-9r6q in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-xxpj-q764-9r6q across npm dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.