Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦 npm
Not in CISA KEV

CVE-2026-53928 — nocodb

CVE-2026-53928 is a CWE-613 vulnerability in nocodb. No vendor fix is recorded yet; mitigation options are listed below.

NocoDB: Refresh Tokens Persist Through Password Recovery

Also known asGHSA-r989-7g3j-wjhw
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
None yet
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Oct 22, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-53928.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs23th percentile — riskier than 23% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.27%0.54%0.81%0.2%0.2%0.3%0.3%0.3%Jul 26Sep 26Oct 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.

0other npm packages depend on this — each one inherits the vulnerability until it's patched upstream
nocodbnpm
1Kdownloads / week

Description

Summary

A stolen refresh token survived a password-forgot flow and could be used to mint fresh JWTs even after the user reset their password.

Details

passwordChange and passwordReset deleted the user's refresh tokens, but passwordForgot only rotated token_version and revoked OAuth tokens — it did not call UserRefreshToken.deleteAllUserToken(user.id). An attacker holding a captured refresh cookie could still exchange it for a new access token after the victim triggered the recovery flow.

Impact

Persistent unauthorized access after password recovery. Once a refresh token leaks, the documented "Forgot password" recovery flow did not in fact revoke the attacker's session.

Credit

This issue was reported by @bugbunny-research.

Affected Packages

1 total
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npmnocodball versionsNo fix

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for nocodb, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Remediation status

    No patched version of nocodb has shipped for CVE-2026-53928 yet. Where your build allows, override or pin the dependency away from the vulnerable range, and apply any maintainer-recommended mitigation.

  3. Mitigate without a patch

    Put an independent control in front of the weakness: restrict the affected endpoint or interface to trusted networks, require an additional authentication factor or proxy-level check, and invalidate existing sessions and credentials in case the flaw has already been used.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary A stolen refresh token survived a password-forgot flow and could be used to mint fresh JWTs even after the user reset their password. ### Details `passwordChange` and `passwordReset` deleted the user's refresh tokens, but `passwordForgot` only rotated `token_version` and revoked OAuth tokens — it did not call `UserRefreshToken.deleteAllUserToken(user.id)`. An attacker holding a captured refresh cookie could still exchange it for a new access token after the victim triggered the recovery flow. ### Impact Persistent unauthorized access after password recovery. Once a refresh token
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-53928 in your dependencies?

Find it across npm, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2026-53928: nocodb