Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🦀
🦀 crates.io
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

GHSA-xwqr-xmgg-j69q

HIGHFix: solana-labs/rbpf#200

GHSA-xwqr-xmgg-j69q is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) CWE-190 vulnerability in solana_rbpf. 2 public exploit references exist, so weaponization risk is real. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-xwqr-xmgg-j69q is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

Integer overflow in solana_rbpf

Also known asCVE-2021-46102
Published
Jan 28, 2022
Updated
Nov 8, 2023
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
2 known
Exploitation data as of Nov 8, 2023 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🦀solana_rbpf

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects crates.io packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

From version 0.2.14 to 0.2.16 for Solana rBPF, function "relocate" in the file src/elf.rs has an integer overflow bug because the sym.st_value is read directly from ELF file without checking. If the sym.st_value is rather large, an integer overflow is triggered while calculating the variable "addr" via addr = (sym.st_value + refd_pa) as u64

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🦀crates.iosolana_rbpf0.2.14&&< 0.2.170.2.17
Exploits & PoCs
2

Research use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for solana_rbpf. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update solana_rbpf to 0.2.17 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-xwqr-xmgg-j69q is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-xwqr-xmgg-j69q is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-xwqr-xmgg-j69q. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

From version 0.2.14 to 0.2.16 for Solana rBPF, function "relocate" in the file src/elf.rs has an integer overflow bug because the sym.st_value is read directly from ELF file without checking. If the sym.st_value is rather large, an integer overflow is triggered while calculating the variable "addr" via `addr = (sym.st_value + refd_pa) as u64`
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-xwqr-xmgg-j69q in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-xwqr-xmgg-j69q across crates.io dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.

GHSA-xwqr-xmgg-j69q: Integer overflow in… | O3 Security