NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🦀
🦀 crates.io
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

Tendermint light client verification not taking into account chain IDGHSA-xqqc-c5gw-c5r5

MEDIUMFix: informalsystems/tendermint-rs@5c32f31

GHSA-xqqc-c5gw-c5r5 is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.4) CWE-347 vulnerability in tendermint-light-client-verifier. A fix is available for tendermint-light-client-verifier — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Also known asCVE-2022-23507
Published
Updated
Affected
3 pkgs
Patched
3 / 3
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Nov 10, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-xqqc-c5gw-c5r5.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs25th percentile — riskier than 25% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.27%0.54%0.82%0.1%0.3%May 26Sep 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

Where this sits among everything scored

Real-World Exposure

3 pkgs affected
🦀tendermint-light-client-verifier🦀tendermint-light-client🦀tendermint-light-client-js

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects crates.io packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Tendermint is a high-performance blockchain consensus engine for Byzantine fault tolerant applications. Versions prior to 0.28.0 contain a potential attack via Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature, affecting anyone using the tendermint-light-client and related packages to perform light client verification (e.g. IBC-rs, Hermes). The light client does not check that the chain IDs of the trusted and untrusted headers match, resulting in a possible attack vector where someone who finds a header from an untrusted chain that satisfies all other verification conditions (e.g. enough overlapping validator signatures) could fool a light client. The attack vector is currently theoretical, and no proof-of-concept exists yet to exploit it on live networks. This issue is patched in version 0.28.0. There are no workarounds.

Affected Packages

3 total 3 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🦀crates.iotendermint-light-client-verifierall versions0.28.0cargo update -p tendermint-light-client-verifier --precise 0.28.0
🦀crates.iotendermint-light-clientall versions0.28.0cargo update -p tendermint-light-client --precise 0.28.0
🦀crates.iotendermint-light-client-jsall versions0.28.0cargo update -p tendermint-light-client-js --precise 0.28.0

Affected Products

3 products · 3 configurations
Application
tendermint-light-clienttendermint-light-client_project
< 0.28.0
range
Application
tendermint-light-client-jstendermint-light-client-js_project
< 0.28.0
range
Application
tendermint-light-client-verifiertendermint-light-client-verifier_project
< 0.28.0
range

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for tendermint-light-client-verifier, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update tendermint-light-client-verifier to 0.28.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-xqqc-c5gw-c5r5 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact Anyone using the `tendermint-light-client` and related packages to perform light client verification (e.g. IBC-rs, Hermes). At present, the light client does not check that the chain IDs of the trusted and untrusted headers match, resulting in a possible attack vector where someone who finds a header from an untrusted chain that satisfies all other verification conditions (e.g. enough overlapping validator signatures) could fool a light client. The attack vector is currently theoretical, and no proof-of-concept exists yet to exploit it on live networks. ### Patches Users of the
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-xqqc-c5gw-c5r5 in your dependencies?

Find it across crates.io, including transitive dependencies.

Tendermint light client verification not taking into account…