GHSA-xmf8-cvqr-rfgj is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) Improper Input Validation vulnerability in @auth/core. A fix is available for @auth/core — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Auth.js: getToken() throws an uncaught exception on malformed Bearer authorization headers
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-xmf8-cvqr-rfgj.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
GHSA-xmf8-cvqr-rfgj plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 379,145 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.
@auth/corenpmnext-authnpmDescription
Summary
The exported getToken() helper (next-auth/jwt and @auth/core/jwt) can throw an uncaught exception when it reads a malformed Authorization: Bearer … header. When no session cookie is present, getToken() URL-decodes the bearer value before validating it, and malformed percent-encoding causes the decode step to throw rather than being treated as an invalid token. Because getToken() is commonly called in API routes, middleware, and other request handlers, a single unauthenticated request can trigger an unhandled exception in code paths that authenticate requests.
Am I affected?
You are affected if all of the following hold:
- You use
next-auth<= 5.0.0-beta.25(or@auth/coreexposing the samegetToken()implementation). - Your application calls
getToken()directly — for example in a Route Handler, middleware, or server-side request handler. - You do not wrap that
getToken()call in your owntry/catch.
You are not affected if you only use the framework's auth() helper and never call getToken() yourself, or if every getToken() call site already has its own exception handling.
Impact
- Denial of service: an unauthenticated request carrying a malformed Bearer authorization header can raise an unhandled exception in any handler that calls
getToken(). - The impact is per-request and limited to availability; it does not expose tokens, sessions, or other data, and does not bypass authentication.
CWE-20: Improper Input Validation.
Patched version
The fix makes getToken() treat a malformed Bearer value as an invalid token and return null, matching how other undecodable tokens are already handled. Upgrade to the first release containing this fix (to be published; this advisory will be updated with the exact patched version before publication) and no code changes are required.
Workarounds
If you cannot upgrade immediately, either:
-
Config/code-level: wrap your
getToken()calls so a thrown error is treated as "no token", e.g.let token = null try { token = await getToken({ req, secret }) } catch { token = null } -
Or strip/normalize the incoming
Authorizationheader at the edge (proxy, middleware) before it reachesgetToken(), rejecting values whose Bearer portion is not valid percent-encoding.
Credit
Reported by @deprrous. Thank you for the responsible disclosure.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | @auth/core | ≥ 0.1.0&&< 0.41.3 | 0.41.3npm install @auth/core@0.41.3 |
| 📦npm | next-auth | ≥ 5.0.0-beta.0&&< 5.0.0-beta.32 | 5.0.0-beta.32npm install next-auth@5.0.0-beta.32 |
| 📦npm | next-auth | ≥ 4.0.6&&< 4.24.15 | 4.24.15npm install next-auth@4.24.15 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for @auth/core, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update @auth/core to 0.41.3 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-xmf8-cvqr-rfgj is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Cap what an attacker can consume: apply request size, rate and timeout limits in front of the affected component, and run it with memory and CPU limits so exhaustion degrades one worker rather than the whole service.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-xmf8-cvqr-rfgj can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to GHSA-xmf8-cvqr-rfgj. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-xmf8-cvqr-rfgj in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds GHSA-xmf8-cvqr-rfgj across npm dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.