CVE-2026-34083 — signalk-server
MEDIUMCVE-2026-34083 is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.1) vulnerability in signalk-server. A fix is available for signalk-server — see the affected versions and patch details below.
signalk-server: OAuth Authorization Code Theft via Unvalidated Host Header in OIDC Flow
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-34083.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-34083 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 379,145 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.
signalk-servernpmDescription
Summary
SignalK Server contains a code-level vulnerability in its OIDC login and logout handlers where the unvalidated HTTP Host header is used to construct the OAuth2 redirect_uri. Because the redirectUri configuration is silently unset by default, an attacker spoof the Host header to steal OAuth authorization codes and hijack user sessions in realistic deployments as The OIDC provider will then send the authorization code to whatever domain was injected.
The OIDC specification requires redirect_uri to be pre-registered and not derived from untrusted input. Constructing it from the Host header violates this requirement and introduces a trust boundary break. This risk is actively amplified by SignalK's official documentation, which instructs administrators to deploy an Nginx configuration that forwards the vulnerable Host header, exposing production environments.
Vulnerability Root Cause
Two factors combine to create this vulnerability:
Factor 1: redirectUri is optional with an unsafe fallback In types.ts:30, redirectUri is declared as optional
export interface OIDCConfig {
// ...
redirectUri?: string // ← Optional, no default value
// ...
}
The defaults in types.ts:175-185 do not include a redirectUri: never checks or warns about a missing redirectUri. This means a fully "valid" OIDC configuration can exist without redirectUri, silently activating the vulnerable fallback path.
export const OIDC_DEFAULTS: Omit<OIDCConfig, 'issuer' | 'clientId' | 'clientSecret'> = {
enabled: false,
scope: 'openid email profile',
defaultPermission: 'readonly',
autoCreateUsers: true,
providerName: 'SSO Login',
autoLogin: false
// ← No redirectUri default
}
Factor 2: Unsafe Host header usage in two locations Location 1 — Login handler in oidc-auth.ts:278-282:
const protocol = req.secure ? 'https' : 'http'
const host = req.get('host') // ← Attacker-controlled
const redirectUri =
oidcConfig.redirectUri || // ← Only safe if explicitly set
`${protocol}://${host}${skAuthPrefix}/oidc/callback` // ← Uses attacker's Host
This redirectUri flows into createAuthState() → buildAuthorizationUrl() → OIDC provider's redirect_uri parameter. The OIDC provider will then send the authorization code to whatever domain was injected.
Location 2 — Logout handler in oidc-auth.ts:513-515:
const protocol = req.secure ? 'https' : 'http'
const host = req.get('host') // ← Same pattern
const fullPostLogoutUri = `${protocol}://${host}${postLogoutRedirect}`
This constructs the post_logout_redirect_uri sent to the OIDC provider's end_session_endpoint, allowing an attacker to redirect the user to an attacker controlled domain after logout.
Official Documentation Enables the Attack
SignalK's own security documentation at docs/security.md:222-228 provides the recommended nginx reverse proxy configuration: The proxy_set_header Host $host; directive forwards the client-supplied Host header to the backend unmodified. Without this directive, nginx would replace the Host header with the upstream address (localhost:3000), which would neutralize the injection.
location / {
proxy_pass http://localhost:3000;
proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $remote_addr;
proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Proto $scheme;
proxy_set_header Host $host; # ← Forwards client's Host header to SignalK
}
Administrators who follow the official documentation are directly enabling this vulnerability behind their reverse proxy.
Proof of Concept
Tested against SignalK Server v2.23.0 in Docker with OIDC enabled .
Step 1 — Send login request with injected Host header:
$response = Invoke-WebRequest -Uri "http://localhost:3000/signalk/v1/auth/oidc/login" -Headers @{"Host"="evil.com"} -MaximumRedirection 0 -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue -UseBasicParsing
Step 2: Decode and print the injected redirect URL
[uri]::UnescapeDataString($response.Headers.Location)
<img width="1259" height="211" alt="Screenshot 2026-03-25 171251" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6e4a9655-639e-48c2-a7f0-06e17ad471ff" />
Impact
- Authorization Code Theft: The OIDC provider sends the OAuth authorization code to the attacker's domain instead of the legitimate server.
- Session Hijack: The attacker can exchange the stolen code for tokens and create a session as the victim user.
- Logout Redirect Hijack: The logout handler has the same pattern, allowing post-logout redirection to an attacker domain (phishing opportunity).
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | signalk-server | ≥ 2.20.0&&< 2.24.0 | 2.24.0npm install signalk-server@2.24.0 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for signalk-server, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update signalk-server to 2.24.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-34083 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2026-34083 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to CVE-2026-34083. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-34083 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds CVE-2026-34083 across npm dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.