GHSA-x5r6-jr56-89pv
MEDIUMGHSA-x5r6-jr56-89pv is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.5) vulnerability in github.com/lxc/incus/v6/cmd/incusd. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-x5r6-jr56-89pv is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.
Incus has Nil Dereferences on Restore via Malformed YAML
Real-World Exposure
github.com/lxc/incus/v6/cmd/incusdReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
Details
It was found that backup.GetInfo() trusts the inline backup/index.yaml config when present and only falls back to parsing the legacy backup/container/backup.yaml file if result.Config == nil. As a result, an archive can carry a valid inline config that passes the initial import preflight while also carrying a malformed legacy backup/container/backup.yaml file that is reparsed later from the restored file system.
ParseConfigYamlFile() accepts YAML documents with no container section, and multiple downstream consumers then dereference .Container without checking for nil. Confirmed examples in the instance restore and import flow include backup.UpdateInstanceConfig() and internalImportFromBackup().
An authenticated user with permission to import instance backups may be able to crash the Incus daemon with a crafted backup archive whose inline backup/index.yaml is valid but whose extracted legacy backup.yaml omits container. The crash occurs in the restore path after archive extraction has begun.
The flow is as follows: A crafted backup archive contains a valid backup/index.yaml file together with a malformed backup/container/backup.yaml file that omits the container section. backup.GetInfo() parses backup/index.yaml successfully, so bInfo.Config is populated from the inline config. Because result.Config != nil, GetInfo() does not fall back to backup/container/backup.yaml. instances_post.go then builds the request from bInfo.Config.Container, which succeeds because the inline config is valid. Later, storage unpack extracts backup/container/backup.yaml into the instance volume as <mountPath>/backup.yaml. backend.go then calls backup.UpdateInstanceConfig(..., mountPath), which reparses <mountPath>/backup.yaml through ParseConfigYamlFile(). Because ParseConfigYamlFile() accepts YAML with no container section, backup.Container == nil, and later access to backup.Container.Devices or backup.Container.ExpandedDevices can trigger a nil-pointer dereference.
Affected Files:
- https://github.com/lxc/incus/blob/v6.22.0/internal/server/backup/backup_info.go#L87
- https://github.com/lxc/incus/blob/v6.22.0/internal/server/backup/backup_info.go#L115
- https://github.com/lxc/incus/blob/v6.22.0/internal/server/backup/backup_config_utils.go#L85
- https://github.com/lxc/incus/blob/v6.22.0/internal/server/backup/backup_config_utils.go#L159
- https://github.com/lxc/incus/blob/v6.22.0/internal/server/storage/backend.go#L809
- https://github.com/lxc/incus/blob/v6.22.0/cmd/incusd/api_internal.go#L749
The initial backup-metadata parser prefers inline backup/index.yaml content:
Affected Code:
if hdr.Name == backupIndexPath {
err = yaml.NewDecoder(tr).Decode(&result)
The legacy backup/container/backup.yaml file is only parsed if the inline config is absent:
Affected Code:
if result.Config == nil && hdr.Name == "backup/container/backup.yaml" {
err = yaml.NewDecoder(tr).Decode(&result.Config)
ParseConfigYamlFile() accepts an empty YAML document, or one with no container section, without validation:
Affected Code:
func ParseConfigYamlFile(path string) (*config.Config, error) {
data, err := os.ReadFile(path)
...
backupConf := config.Config{}
err = yaml.Unmarshal(data, &backupConf)
UpdateInstanceConfig() conditionally uses backup.Container at first but later dereferences it unconditionally:
Affected Code:
if backup.Container != nil {
backup.Container.Name = b.Name
backup.Container.Project = b.Project
}
if updateRootDevicePool(backup.Container.Devices, pool.Name) {
rootDiskDeviceFound = true
}
if updateRootDevicePool(backup.Container.ExpandedDevices, pool.Name) {
rootDiskDeviceFound = true
}
Another confirmed sink is present in internalImportFromBackup():
Affected Code:
if allowNameOverride {
backupConf.Container.Name = instName
}
if instName != backupConf.Container.Name {
return fmt.Errorf("Instance name requested %q doesn't match instance name in backup config %q", instName, backupConf.Container.Name)
}
This was confirmed as follows:
Command:
go test ./test/fuzz -run='TestExtractedBackupYAMLMissingContainerNilDereference' -count=1 -v
Output:
=== RUN TestExtractedBackupYAMLMissingContainerNilDereference
=== RUN TestExtractedBackupYAMLMissingContainerNilDereference/legacy_backup_empty
extracted_backup_yaml_poc_test.go:70: UpdateInstanceConfig panicked on malformed extracted
backup.yaml (container is nil): runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer
dereference
=== RUN TestExtractedBackupYAMLMissingContainerNilDereference/legacy_backup_pool_only
extracted_backup_yaml_poc_test.go:70: UpdateInstanceConfig panicked on malformed extracted
backup.yaml (container is nil): runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer
dereference
=== RUN TestExtractedBackupYAMLMissingContainerNilDereference/legacy_backup_volume_only
extracted_backup_yaml_poc_test.go:70: UpdateInstanceConfig panicked on malformed extracted
backup.yaml (container is nil): runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer
dereference
--- FAIL: TestExtractedBackupYAMLMissingContainerNilDereference (0.21s)
FAIL
It is recommended to validate the parsed legacy backup.yaml structure before any dereference and to fail with a standard error if Container is missing:
Proposed Fix:
if backup.Container == nil {
return errors.New("No container struct in the backup file found")
}
That validation should be added at minimum in: backup.UpdateInstanceConfig() and internalImportFromBackup() before any backupConf.Container.* access
More broadly, it is recommended to centralize backup-config validation so that both inline backup/index.yaml and extracted legacy backup.yaml files are checked against the same structural requirements before any restore or import consumer uses them.
A patch is available at https://github.com/lxc/incus/releases/tag/v7.0.0.
Credit
This issue was discovered and reported by the team at 7asecurity (https://7asecurity.com/)
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | github.com/lxc/incus/v6/cmd/incusd | all versions | No fix |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/lxc/incus/v6/cmd/incusd. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Remediation status
No patched version of github.com/lxc/incus/v6/cmd/incusd has shipped for GHSA-x5r6-jr56-89pv yet. Where your build allows, override or pin the dependency away from the vulnerable range, and apply any maintainer-recommended mitigation.
Mitigate without a patch
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-x5r6-jr56-89pv is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-x5r6-jr56-89pv. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-x5r6-jr56-89pv in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-x5r6-jr56-89pv across Go dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.