Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦
📦 npm
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

GHSA-wpg9-4g4v-f9rc — openclaw

MEDIUM

GHSA-wpg9-4g4v-f9rc is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.9) CWE-863 vulnerability in openclaw. A fix is available for openclaw — see the affected versions and patch details below.

OpenClaw: Discord voice transcript owner-flag omission could expose owner-only tools in mixed-trust channels

Also known asCVE-2026-32035
Published
Mar 3, 2026
Updated
May 5, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 24, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-wpg9-4g4v-f9rc.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.2%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs14th percentile — riskier than 14% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-wpg9-4g4v-f9rc plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 379,145 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.

133other npm packages depend on this — each one inherits the vulnerability until it's patched upstream
openclawnpm
2.5Mdownloads / week

Description

Summary

In [email protected], the Discord voice transcript path called agentCommand(...) without senderIsOwner, and agentCommand defaults missing senderIsOwner to true.

This could allow a non-owner voice participant in the same channel to reach owner-only tool surfaces (gateway, cron) during voice transcript turns.

Security model note

OpenClaw’s documented trust model is a personal assistant model (one trusted operator), not an adversarial multi-user boundary.

  • OpenClaw does not treat one shared gateway/chat surface as a hardened per-user auth boundary.
  • Mixed-trust deployments (mutually untrusted users sharing one gateway/channel) are outside recommended deployment boundaries.

This report is treated as a valid hardening/authorization bug because owner-only tool policy should still be applied consistently across chat-driven turns, including Discord voice transcript ingress.

Details

Relevant path:

  1. Voice transcript run omitted senderIsOwner in Discord voice manager.
  2. Missing senderIsOwner defaulted to true in agentCommand.
  3. Owner-only tool policy is keyed on senderIsOwner.
  4. gateway and cron are owner-only tools.

Impact

  • Affects deployments where Discord voice is enabled and the bot is present in channels with non-owner participants.
  • No gateway-auth boundary bypass was required.
  • Practical risk depends strongly on whether the deployment is single-trust (recommended) or mixed-trust (not recommended).

Severity rationale

Downgraded from high to medium to align with OpenClaw’s trust model and deployment assumptions:

  • Requires participation in the same voice environment as the trusted operator workflow.
  • Requires Discord voice path conditions (joined voice channel + transcript flow).
  • Does not introduce a new cross-gateway or unauthenticated boundary bypass.

Remediation

  • Always pass explicit senderIsOwner from Discord voice transcript ingress.
  • Fail closed (false) when owner status is unknown for non-local/chat ingress paths.
  • Keep regression tests that verify owner/non-owner voice speaker handling.

Affected Packages / Versions

  • Package: openclaw (npm)
  • Affected versions: <= 2026.3.1
  • Patched versions: >= 2026.3.2 (released)

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npmopenclawall versions2026.3.2npm install openclaw@2026.3.2

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for openclaw, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update openclaw to 2026.3.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-wpg9-4g4v-f9rc is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-wpg9-4g4v-f9rc can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-wpg9-4g4v-f9rc. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary In `[email protected]`, the Discord voice transcript path called `agentCommand(...)` without `senderIsOwner`, and `agentCommand` defaults missing `senderIsOwner` to `true`. This could allow a non-owner voice participant in the same channel to reach owner-only tool surfaces (`gateway`, `cron`) during voice transcript turns. ### Security model note OpenClaw’s documented trust model is a **personal assistant** model (one trusted operator), not an adversarial multi-user boundary. - OpenClaw does **not** treat one shared gateway/chat surface as a hardened per-user auth boundary. - Mi
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-wpg9-4g4v-f9rc in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-wpg9-4g4v-f9rc across npm dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

GHSA-wpg9-4g4v-f9rc: openclaw | O3 Security