How severe is CVE-2026-32035?

No CVSS score has been assigned to CVE-2026-32035 yet. Review the advisory details and affected package list to assess your exposure.

Which packages are affected by CVE-2026-32035?

CVE-2026-32035 affects the following packages: openclaw (npm). Ecosystems affected: npm.

How do I fix CVE-2026-32035?

Update openclaw to 2026.3.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-32035 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

How do I detect CVE-2026-32035 in my npm dependencies?

Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for openclaw, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

How do I mitigate CVE-2026-32035 if there is no patch (or I can't update yet)?

If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

How does O3 Security protect against CVE-2026-32035?

O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2026-32035 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Is CVE-2026-32035 actively exploited in the wild?

No public exploit code has been indexed for CVE-2026-32035 yet. This does not mean the vulnerability cannot be exploited — absence of public exploits does not imply safety. Apply the recommended fix and use O3 Security to monitor your exposure.

What is the EPSS score for CVE-2026-32035?

CVE-2026-32035 has an EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) score of 0.1%, placing it in the 4th percentile of all CVEs. EPSS is maintained by FIRST.org and estimates the probability that a vulnerability will be exploited in the wild within the next 30 days. This score indicates relatively lower exploitation probability, though the CVSS severity should still guide your patching priority.

What type of vulnerability is CVE-2026-32035?

CVE-2026-32035 is classified as CWE-863 (CWE-863). This weakness type describe the underlying flaw category, which helps determine the potential impact and the right class of mitigation.

When was CVE-2026-32035 published, and has it been updated?

CVE-2026-32035 was published on March 19, 2026 and was last updated on August 12, 2026. Advisory data evolves as severity scores, affected ranges, and exploit intelligence are revised — always check the latest version of the advisory before acting.

📦 npm

Not in CISA KEV

CVE-2026-32035 — openclaw

CVE-2026-32035 is a CWE-863 vulnerability in openclaw. A fix is available for openclaw — see the affected versions and patch details below.

OpenClaw < 2026.3.2 - Missing Owner Flag Validation in Discord Voice Transcript Handler

Also known asGHSA-wpg9-4g4v-f9rc

Published

Mar 19, 2026

Updated

Aug 12, 2026

Affected

1 pkg

Patched

1 / 1

Exploits

None indexed

Exploitation data as of Sep 21, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-32035.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗

0.1%probability of exploitation in next 30 days

Lower Risk0.00%

Lower risk than most CVEs4th percentile — riskier than 4% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.

133other npm packages depend on this — each one inherits the vulnerability until it's patched upstream

openclawnpm

2.7Mdownloads / week

Description

Summary

In [email protected], the Discord voice transcript path called agentCommand(...) without senderIsOwner, and agentCommand defaults missing senderIsOwner to true.

This could allow a non-owner voice participant in the same channel to reach owner-only tool surfaces (gateway, cron) during voice transcript turns.

Security model note

OpenClaw’s documented trust model is a personal assistant model (one trusted operator), not an adversarial multi-user boundary.

OpenClaw does not treat one shared gateway/chat surface as a hardened per-user auth boundary.
Mixed-trust deployments (mutually untrusted users sharing one gateway/channel) are outside recommended deployment boundaries.

This report is treated as a valid hardening/authorization bug because owner-only tool policy should still be applied consistently across chat-driven turns, including Discord voice transcript ingress.

Details

Relevant path:

Voice transcript run omitted senderIsOwner in Discord voice manager.
Missing senderIsOwner defaulted to true in agentCommand.
Owner-only tool policy is keyed on senderIsOwner.
gateway and cron are owner-only tools.

Impact

Affects deployments where Discord voice is enabled and the bot is present in channels with non-owner participants.
No gateway-auth boundary bypass was required.
Practical risk depends strongly on whether the deployment is single-trust (recommended) or mixed-trust (not recommended).

Severity rationale

Downgraded from high to medium to align with OpenClaw’s trust model and deployment assumptions:

Requires participation in the same voice environment as the trusted operator workflow.
Requires Discord voice path conditions (joined voice channel + transcript flow).
Does not introduce a new cross-gateway or unauthenticated boundary bypass.

Remediation

Always pass explicit senderIsOwner from Discord voice transcript ingress.
Fail closed (false) when owner status is unknown for non-local/chat ingress paths.
Keep regression tests that verify owner/non-owner voice speaker handling.

Affected Packages / Versions

Package: openclaw (npm)
Affected versions: <= 2026.3.1
Patched versions: >= 2026.3.2 (released)

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed

Ecosystem	Package	Vulnerable range	Fix
📦npm	`openclaw`	all versions	2026.3.2`npm install openclaw@2026.3.2`

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency

Detect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for openclaw, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update openclaw to 2026.3.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-32035 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2026-32035 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to CVE-2026-32035. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary In `[email protected]`, the Discord voice transcript path called `agentCommand(...)` without `senderIsOwner`, and `agentCommand` defaults missing `senderIsOwner` to `true`. This could allow a non-owner voice participant in the same channel to reach owner-only tool surfaces (`gateway`, `cron`) during voice transcript turns. ### Security model note OpenClaw’s documented trust model is a **personal assistant** model (one trusted operator), not an adversarial multi-user boundary. - OpenClaw does **not** treat one shared gateway/chat surface as a hardened per-user auth boundary. - Mi

O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-32035 in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds CVE-2026-32035 across npm dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

Scan my dependencies How O3 SCA works