Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦 npm

GHSA-w9j2-pvgh-6h63

MEDIUM

GHSA-w9j2-pvgh-6h63 is a medium-severity (CVSS 4.8) vulnerability in axios. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-w9j2-pvgh-6h63 is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

Axios: Authentication Bypass via Prototype Pollution Gadget in `validateStatus` Merge Strategy

Also known asCVE-2026-42041
Published
May 5, 2026
Updated
May 6, 2026
Affected
2 pkgs
Patched
2 / 2
Exploits
None indexed

Blast Radius

2 pkgs affected

Weekly download volume for affected packages — a proxy for how broadly this vulnerability is deployed.

axiosnpm
117.9Mdownloads / week

Description

Vulnerability Disclosure: Authentication Bypass via Prototype Pollution Gadget in validateStatus Merge Strategy

Summary

The Axios library is vulnerable to a Prototype Pollution "Gadget" attack that allows any Object.prototype pollution to silently suppress all HTTP error responses (401, 403, 500, etc.), causing them to be treated as successful responses. This completely bypasses application-level authentication and error handling.

The root cause is that validateStatus is the only config property using the mergeDirectKeys merge strategy, which uses JavaScript's in operator — an operator that inherently traverses the prototype chain. When Object.prototype.validateStatus is polluted with () => true, all HTTP status codes are accepted as success.

Severity: High (CVSS 8.2) Affected Versions: All versions (v0.x - v1.x including v1.15.0) Vulnerable Component: lib/core/mergeConfig.js (mergeDirectKeys strategy) + lib/core/settle.js

CWE

  • CWE-1321: Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution')
  • CWE-287: Improper Authentication

CVSS 3.1

Score: 8.2 (High)

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N

MetricValueJustification
Attack VectorNetworkPP is triggered remotely
Attack ComplexityLowOnce PP exists, a single property assignment exploits this. Consistent with GHSA-fvcv-3m26-pcqx
Privileges RequiredNoneNo authentication needed
User InteractionNoneNo user interaction required
ScopeUnchangedImpact within the application
ConfidentialityLow401 treated as success may expose data behind auth gates
IntegrityHighAll error handling and auth checks are silently bypassed — application operates on invalid assumptions
AvailabilityNoneThe function works correctly (returns true), no crash

Usage of "Helper" Vulnerabilities

This vulnerability requires Zero Direct User Input.

If an attacker can pollute Object.prototype via any other library in the stack, Axios will automatically inherit the polluted validateStatus function during config merge. The in operator in mergeDirectKeys makes this property uniquely susceptible to prototype pollution compared to all other config properties.

Why validateStatus Is Uniquely Vulnerable

All other config properties use defaultToConfig2, which reads config2[prop] (traverses prototype). But validateStatus uses mergeDirectKeys, which uses the in operator:

// mergeConfig.js:58-64 — mergeDirectKeys (ONLY used by validateStatus)
function mergeDirectKeys(a, b, prop) {
  if (prop in config2) {           // ← `in` traverses prototype chain!
    return getMergedValue(a, b);
  } else if (prop in config1) {
    return getMergedValue(undefined, a);
  }
}

// mergeConfig.js:94
const mergeMap = {
  // ... all others use defaultToConfig2 ...
  validateStatus: mergeDirectKeys,   // ← ONLY property using this strategy
};

The in operator is a more aggressive prototype traversal than property access. While config2['validateStatus'] also traverses the prototype, the explicit in check makes the intent clearer and the vulnerability more direct.

Proof of Concept

1. The Setup (Simulated Pollution)

Object.prototype.validateStatus = () => true;

2. The Gadget Trigger (Safe Code)

// Application checks authentication via HTTP status codes
try {
  const response = await axios.get('https://api.internal/admin/users');
  // Developer expects: 401 → catch block → redirect to login
  // Reality: 401 → treated as success → displays admin data
  processAdminData(response.data);  // Executes with 401 response body!
} catch (error) {
  redirectToLogin();  // NEVER REACHED for 401/403/500
}

3. The Execution

// mergeConfig.js:58 — 'validateStatus' in config2
// config2 = { url: '/admin/users', method: 'get' }
// 'validateStatus' in config2 → checks prototype → finds () => true → TRUE
// → getMergedValue(defaultValidator, () => true) → returns () => true

// settle.js:16 — ALL status codes resolve
const validateStatus = response.config.validateStatus;  // () => true
if (!response.status || !validateStatus || validateStatus(response.status)) {
  resolve(response);  // 401, 403, 500 all resolve here!
}

4. The Impact

Before pollution:
  HTTP 200 → resolve (success)
  HTTP 401 → reject (auth error) → redirectToLogin()
  HTTP 403 → reject (forbidden) → showAccessDenied()
  HTTP 500 → reject (server error) → showErrorPage()

After pollution:
  HTTP 200 → resolve (success)
  HTTP 401 → resolve (SUCCESS!) → processAdminData() with error body
  HTTP 403 → resolve (SUCCESS!) → application thinks user has access
  HTTP 500 → resolve (SUCCESS!) → application processes error as data

Verified PoC Output

--- Before Pollution ---
401: REJECTED as expected - Request failed with status code 401
500: REJECTED as expected - Request failed with status code 500

--- After Pollution ---
200: RESOLVED as success (status: 200)
301: RESOLVED as success (status: 301)
401: RESOLVED as success (status: 401)
403: RESOLVED as success (status: 403)
404: RESOLVED as success (status: 404)
500: RESOLVED as success (status: 500)
503: RESOLVED as success (status: 503)

--- Authentication Bypass Demo ---
Auth check bypassed! 401 treated as success.
Application proceeds with: { status: 401, message: 'Response with status 401' }

Impact Analysis

  • Authentication Bypass: Applications relying on axios rejecting 401/403 to enforce auth will silently accept unauthorized responses, allowing unauthenticated access to protected resources.
  • Silent Error Swallowing: 500-series errors are treated as success, causing applications to process error bodies as valid data — leading to data corruption or logic errors.
  • Security Control Bypass: Rate limiting (429), WAF blocks (403), and CAPTCHA challenges are suppressed.
  • Universal Scope: Affects every axios instance in the application, including third-party libraries.

Recommended Fix

Replace the in operator with hasOwnProperty in mergeDirectKeys:

// FIXED: lib/core/mergeConfig.js
function mergeDirectKeys(a, b, prop) {
  if (Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(config2, prop)) {
    return getMergedValue(a, b);
  } else if (Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(config1, prop)) {
    return getMergedValue(undefined, a);
  }
}

Resources

Timeline

DateEvent
2026-04-15Vulnerability discovered during source code audit
2026-04-15PoC developed and vulnerability confirmed
2026-04-16Report revised for accuracy
TBDReport submitted to vendor via GitHub Security Advisory

Affected Packages

2 total 2 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npmaxios1.0.0&&< 1.15.11.15.1
📦npmaxiosall versions0.31.1

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for axios. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update axios to 1.15.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-w9j2-pvgh-6h63 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-w9j2-pvgh-6h63 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-w9j2-pvgh-6h63. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

# Vulnerability Disclosure: Authentication Bypass via Prototype Pollution Gadget in `validateStatus` Merge Strategy ## Summary The Axios library is vulnerable to a Prototype Pollution "Gadget" attack that allows any `Object.prototype` pollution to **silently suppress all HTTP error responses** (401, 403, 500, etc.), causing them to be treated as successful responses. This completely bypasses application-level authentication and error handling. The root cause is that `validateStatus` is the **only** config property using the `mergeDirectKeys` merge strategy, which uses JavaScript's `in` oper
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-w9j2-pvgh-6h63 in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-w9j2-pvgh-6h63 across npm dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.