GHSA-w8x7-h2px-xmq8 is a medium-severity (CVSS 4.3) CWE-863 vulnerability in github.com/cloudreve/Cloudreve/v4. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-w8x7-h2px-xmq8 is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.
Cloudreve: Broken Access Control in file event stream: a single-file share recipient is subscribed to the owner's parent folder and receives activity events for unshared siblings
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-w8x7-h2px-xmq8.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
GHSA-w8x7-h2px-xmq8 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 370,894 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
github.com/cloudreve/Cloudreve/v4🐹github.com/cloudreve/Cloudreve/v3Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
When an authenticated recipient of a single-file share opens the file event stream (GET /api/v4/file/events?uri=<share-root>), Cloudreve validates the URI by listing it and then subscribes the caller to parent.ID(). For a single-file share, the share navigator resolves the bare share-root URI to the owner-side parent folder of the shared file (not the file), while the visible listing is filtered down to just the shared file. The event hub then keys topics by numeric file ID only and, on each file change, fans the event out to subscribers of every ancestor topic, filtering only the client ID that caused the event — never the subscriber's share scope.
Consequently, a recipient of one shared file can receive Server-Sent Events (type, sibling path/name, rename target, hashed file ID) for other files and subfolders in the owner's parent folder that were never shared. Contents are not disclosed; file-activity metadata is.
Details
Root cause (verified at 26b6b10)
1. Events route — authenticated, feature-flagged, no share-scope check (routers/router.go):
file := v4.Group("file"); file.Use(middleware.RequiredScopes(types.ScopeFilesRead))
file.GET("events",
middleware.LoginRequired(),
middleware.IsFunctionEnabled(func(c *gin.Context) bool { return dep.SettingProvider().EventHubEnabled(c) }),
controllers.FromQuery[explorer.ExplorerEventService](...), controllers.HandleExplorerEventsPush)
EventHubEnabled defaults true (inventory/setting.go: "fs_event_push_enabled":"1").
2. Service subscribes to the listed parent's ID (service/explorer/events.go):
parent, _, err := m.List(c, uri, &manager.ListArgs{Page:0, PageSize:1}) // also runs share validity/password
...
rx, resumed, err := eventHub.Subscribe(c, parent.ID(), requestInfo.ClientID)
3. Single-file share Root swaps the share root to the owner parent (share_navigator.go):
n.shareRoot = newFile(nil, share.Edges.File)
...
if n.shareRoot.Type() == types.FileTypeFile {
n.singleFileShare = true
n.shareRoot = n.shareRoot.Parent // <-- owner-side parent folder
}
4. To returns that parent for the bare root URI (share_navigator.go):
elements := path.Elements()
if len(elements) == 1 && n.singleFileShare { return latestSharedSingleFile(...) } // only when URI names the file
...
return current // current == shareRoot == owner parent folder
The bare root share URI has zero path elements (URI.Elements() returns nil for path /), so the len(elements)==1 guard is skipped and To returns the parent folder. dbfs.List returns that as parent, so parent.ID() is the owner parent folder's real ID.
5. Children masks the broader parent — for singleFileShare it returns only []*File{sharedFile}, so the recipient's listing shows just the shared file even though the subscribed topic is the whole parent.
6. Publication fans out to ancestor topics with only a client-ID filter (dbfs/events.go):
func (f *DBFS) getEligibleSubscriber(ctx, file, checkParentPerm) []foundSubscriber {
roots := file.Ancestors()
for _, root := range roots {
subscribers := f.eventHub.GetSubscribers(ctx, root.Model.ID)
subscribers = lo.Filter(subscribers, func(s eventhub.Subscriber, _ int) bool {
return !(requestInfo != nil && s.ID() == requestInfo.ClientID) // ONLY exclude the causing client
})
...
}
}
// emit*: From: subscriber.relativePath(file) // owner-side path of the changed sibling
relativePath trims the changed file's owner path by the subscribed root's owner path, yielding the sibling's name (e.g. /Secret-Plan.pdf). No check that the subscriber is authorized for the changed file or within their share scope.
Validation performed
Independent validation against commit 26b6b10 in a clean sandbox.
Source-verified (static): all of (1)–(6) confirmed verbatim, including the negative direction (an explicit …/shared.txt URI resolves to the file, and oss/qiniu-style flows are irrelevant here).
Dynamic (control-flow executed): the full binary is not buildable offline (modules behind an unreachable proxy, embedded frontend, DB/eventhub). The reseacher ran two harnesses:
- A
net/url-based check of the linchpin — the bare root share URI yields0path elements (soToreturns the parent), while…/shared.txtyields1(returns the file). This is the subtle point on which the whole finding turns, and it holds. - A model of
Root/To/getEligibleSubscriber/relativePathdriving the end-to-end flow:
[1] single-file share root URI -> m.List parent = "docs" (id 10), NOT shared.txt (id 11) -> subscribed to owner parent
[2] owner renames /docs/Secret-Plan.pdf -> client 'attacker' receives: from="/Secret-Plan.pdf" file_id=12 (topic 10)
[3] CONTROL: event caused by attacker's own client id -> suppressed (the only filter)
[4] CONTROL: explicit URI 'shared.txt' -> resolves to file (id 11) -> no sibling events
Steps to reproduce
- Owner shares a single file
shared.txtfrom/docs, which also containsSecret-Plan.pdf. - Recipient (logged-in,
Files.Read, with the share password if any) opens the event stream on the share root:GET /api/v4/file/events?uri=cloudreve%3A%2F%2F<share-id>%40share Cookie: cloudreve-session=<recipient-session> X-Cr-Client-Id: <uuid> Accept: text/event-stream - Owner creates/renames/modifies/moves/deletes
Secret-Plan.pdf. - The recipient's stream receives, e.g.:
event: event data: {"type":"rename","file_id":"<hashed>","from":"/Secret-Plan.pdf","to":"/Secret-Plan-v2.pdf"}
Expected: the recipient only receives events for the shared file. Actual: the recipient receives activity events for unshared siblings in the owner's parent folder.
Impact
A single-file share recipient gains a real-time feed of file-activity metadata for the owner's parent folder — sibling names, operation types, and rename targets they were never granted access to. No file contents are exposed.
Remediation
- For single-file shares, subscribe to the shared file's ID, or reject event subscriptions on the single-file share root view.
- Store an authorization scope (navigator/share root) per subscriber and publish only events whose path stays within that scope.
- Incorporate user/share scope into topic keys, not just file ID + client ID.
- On subscriber reactivation, re-verify the requester still matches the subscriber and is authorized for the topic.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | github.com/cloudreve/Cloudreve/v4 | all versions | 4.0.0-20260613030215-0b00dd308f13 |
| 🐹Go | github.com/cloudreve/Cloudreve/v3 | all versions | No fix |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/cloudreve/Cloudreve/v4. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update github.com/cloudreve/Cloudreve/v4 to 4.0.0-20260613030215-0b00dd308f13 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-w8x7-h2px-xmq8 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-w8x7-h2px-xmq8 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-w8x7-h2px-xmq8. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-w8x7-h2px-xmq8 in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-w8x7-h2px-xmq8 across Go dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.