Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹
🐹 Go
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

GHSA-w8j3-pq8g-8m7w

HIGH

GHSA-w8j3-pq8g-8m7w is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability in github.com/iskorotkov/avro/v2. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-w8j3-pq8g-8m7w is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

iskorotkov/avro: CPU Exhaustion in Decoder

Also known asCVE-2026-46385GO-2026-5046
Published
May 18, 2026
Updated
Aug 5, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Aug 14, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-w8j3-pq8g-8m7w.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.5%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs41th percentile — riskier than 41% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.33%0.67%1.00%0.0%0.4%0.5%0.5%Jun 26Aug 26Aug 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-w8j3-pq8g-8m7w plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 0 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐹github.com/iskorotkov/avro/v2

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

CPU Exhaustion in Avro Decoder via Unbounded Block-Count Iteration

Summary

The Avro array and map decoders looped over an attacker-controlled block-count value without checking the underlying reader's error state inside the loop body. Reader.ReadBlockHeader returns the count as a Go int, which is 64-bit on amd64 / arm64 targets — so a producer can declare a block of up to math.MaxInt64 (~9.2 × 10¹⁸) elements followed by EOF (or any truncated payload), and the decoder will attempt that many no-op iterations before propagating the error. The realistic ceiling is "indefinite until the worker is killed externally" — a single hostile payload pins a CPU core until the process is OOM-killed, deadline-cancelled, or terminated. Remote, unauthenticated denial-of-service.

The fix exits the loop on the first inner-decode error. It does not bound the loop length itself; for full coverage on untrusted inputs, also configure Config.MaxSliceAllocSize and Config.MaxMapAllocSize (the latter introduced in v2.33.0).

Description

Avro arrays and maps are encoded as one or more blocks; each block declares an element count followed by that many encoded elements. The decoder reads the block count as a zigzag-encoded long, then iterates that many times calling an inner decoder.

Three iteration sites trusted the block count without checking the reader's accumulated error state between iterations:

  • codec_skip.go sliceSkipDecoder.Decode — skip helper for arrays.
  • codec_skip.go mapSkipDecoder.Decode — skip helper for maps.
  • reader_generic.go Reader.ReadArrayCB and Reader.ReadMapCB — callback-based decoders used by generic and unmarshaling code paths.

Because the inner Decode(nil, r) call is a no-op when r has already errored (it returns immediately without consuming bytes), the loop would run to completion even after the first iteration's EOF. On amd64 / arm64, Reader.ReadBlockHeader returns the count as int (= int64), so the loop bound is whatever the wire payload specified, up to math.MaxInt64. A modest 200-million-count payload (well under 2³¹) already burns several seconds; a math.MaxInt − 2 payload (the value used in the regression test TestDecoder_ArrayMultiBlockExceedsMaxInt from PR #9) effectively pins the goroutine until external kill.

This overlaps with GHSA-mc57-h6j3-3hmv: the same large-block-count payload that drives the unbounded loop here also drives the cumulative-arithmetic overflow there (cross-platform), and on a 32-bit target additionally triggers the union-index / byte-slice narrowing.

Affected components

FileFunctionPRFix commit
codec_skip.gosliceSkipDecoder.Decodeb124caa
codec_skip.gomapSkipDecoder.Decodeb124caa
reader_generic.goReader.ReadArrayCB#42ce4242
reader_generic.goReader.ReadMapCB#42ce4242

These are the audited and patched sites. Any other code path that iterates over an attacker-controlled count while calling a Reader-style decoder is structurally susceptible to the same pattern; reviewers of consumer code should grep for for range l / for i := 0; i < int(l); i++ near Reader method calls and confirm an in-loop error check.

Technical details

Vulnerable pattern:

for range l {
    d.decoder.Decode(nil, r)
    // r.Error may have been set by Decode; loop continues regardless.
}

After r.Error != nil, subsequent Decode calls short-circuit and return without consuming bytes or doing useful work, but the loop control variable still runs to l. With l = math.MaxInt64, the loop body executes ~9.2 × 10¹⁸ times — effectively infinite for any realistic timeout.

Fixed pattern (b124caa, 2ce4242):

for range l {
    d.decoder.Decode(nil, r)
    if r.Error != nil {
        break
    }
}

The fix terminates the loop on the first inner error. It does not bound l itself — a well-formed payload that actually contains N encoded null elements still iterates N times. The MaxSliceAllocSize / MaxMapAllocSize caps are the policy-level bound on that case (see Mitigation).

Fixed behavior

The reader's accumulated error is checked after every inner Decode in the four affected loops. Decoder errors now surface in O(1) iterations instead of O(blockCount) when the underlying read fails mid-stream.

Affected versions

  • github.com/hamba/avro/v2 — all versions up to and including v2.31.0 (repository is read-only upstream).
  • github.com/iskorotkov/avro/v2 — all versions prior to v2.33.0.

Fixed versions

github.com/iskorotkov/avro/v2 v2.33.0 and later. There is no upstream fix for github.com/hamba/avro/v2 — module path is archived. Migrate to the fork as described under Mitigation.

Mitigation

Migrate from github.com/hamba/avro/v2 to github.com/iskorotkov/avro/v2 >= v2.33.0. Replace the import path and run go mod tidy:

go get github.com/iskorotkov/avro/v2@latest

Or, for consumers that prefer the original import path, a replace directive in go.mod:

replace github.com/hamba/avro/v2 => github.com/iskorotkov/avro/v2 v2.33.0

replace is honoured only for the main module of a build — transitive consumers must add their own replace, or migrate the import path directly.

The error-propagation fix runs on the existing decode path and requires no configuration.

For defense-in-depth against well-formed but oversized payloads (where the fix above does not help, because no error fires), set explicit allocation caps:

cfg := avro.Config{
    MaxByteSliceSize:  102_400,
    MaxSliceAllocSize: 10_000,
    MaxMapAllocSize:   10_000,
}.Freeze()

decoder := cfg.NewDecoder(schema, reader)

MaxMapAllocSize is new in v2.33.0 and opt-in (default zero, which leaves the previous unbounded behavior). Without setting it, a producer that ships a math.MaxInt64-count block still consumes the corresponding memory and CPU; see GHSA-mx64-mj3q-7prj for the cumulative-allocation enforcement details.

If you cannot upgrade immediately, the structural workarounds are application-level: per-request decode timeouts, isolated decoder workers under CPU quotas, and rejection of payloads whose advertised block count exceeds a known sane bound for your schema.

Proof-of-concept input

A minimal payload that triggers the bug for an array of int:

zigzag-encoded long: math.MaxInt64   (block element count)
EOF                                  (no further bytes)

The decoder reads the block-count header, enters the loop, fails to read the first element (EOF), records the error, and then iterates math.MaxInt64 − 1 further times calling the inner decoder as a no-op. Wall-clock cost on commodity hardware: indefinite — the goroutine pins one CPU core until the process is OOM-killed, deadline-cancelled, or terminated externally. The classic "a few seconds per request" characterisation applies only to small-but-still-pathological block counts in the 10⁸–10⁹ range (e.g. 200_999_000 in TestDecoder_SkipArrayEOF); the architectural ceiling is math.MaxInt64.

A negative block count (-N) is also legal in Avro (signals an N-element block with an explicit byte length); the same iteration pattern applies once the count is negated.

References

Credits

  • Discovery and fixes (commits b124caa skip helpers and 2ce4242 callback path, PR #4): Daniel Błażewicz (@klajok)
  • Release authorship: Ivan Korotkov (@iskorotkov)

Timeline

  • 2026-04-28 — Skip-decoder fix (b124caa) merged.
  • 2026-04-30 — Callback-decoder fix (PR #4, 2ce4242) merged.
  • 2026-05-06v2.33.0 tagged and released.
  • 2026-05-11 — Advisory published.
  • 2026-05-15 — Advisory revised.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogithub.com/iskorotkov/avro/v2all versions2.33.0

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/iskorotkov/avro/v2. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update github.com/iskorotkov/avro/v2 to 2.33.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-w8j3-pq8g-8m7w is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-w8j3-pq8g-8m7w is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-w8j3-pq8g-8m7w. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Fixing This On Your OS

If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.

Red HatImportant

This vulnerability affects Avro array and map decoding functionality in affected Go Avro libraries. Red Hat Product Security has assessed this issue as an Important severity vulnerability. A remote unauthenticated attacker may supply specially crafted Avro payloads containing excessively large block-count values…

Frequently Asked Questions

# CPU Exhaustion in Avro Decoder via Unbounded Block-Count Iteration ## Summary The Avro array and map decoders looped over an attacker-controlled block-count value without checking the underlying reader's error state inside the loop body. `Reader.ReadBlockHeader` returns the count as a Go `int`, which is 64-bit on `amd64` / `arm64` targets — so a producer can declare a block of up to `math.MaxInt64` (~9.2 × 10¹⁸) elements followed by EOF (or any truncated payload), and the decoder will attempt that many no-op iterations before propagating the error. The realistic ceiling is "indefinite unti
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-w8j3-pq8g-8m7w in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-w8j3-pq8g-8m7w across Go dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.