Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

GHSA-w76h-q7c6-jpjp

MEDIUMFix: oscal-compass/compliance-trestle@53de5e7

GHSA-w76h-q7c6-jpjp is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.7) Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in compliance-trestle. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-w76h-q7c6-jpjp is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

compliance-trestle Vulnerable to SSRF in Remote Fetching Subsystem

Also known asCVE-2026-46380PYSEC-2026-2427
Published
May 28, 2026
Updated
Jul 13, 2026
Affected
2 pkgs
Patched
2 / 2
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Aug 16, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.1%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs1th percentile — riskier than 1% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-w76h-q7c6-jpjp plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 364,277 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

2 pkgs affected
🐍compliance-trestle🐍compliance-trestle

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

A source code audit led to the discovery of three significant security vulnerabilities in the trestle/core/remote/cache.py module.

Finding 1 (Critical): SSRF (CWE-918) The HTTPSFetcher._do_fetch() method passes a user-supplied URL directly to requests.get() without validation. This allows an attacker to perform Server-Side Request Forgery, targeting internal services or cloud metadata endpoints (e.g., 169.254.169.254).

Per rule 4.2.11 of the CVE CNA rules Finding 1 will be addressed in this advisory, while findings 2 & 3 will be addressed in separate advisories:


Multiple Path Traversal Vulnerabilities in Remote Fetching Subsystem

Finding 2 & 3 (High/Medium): Path Traversal (CWE-22) The caching logic for HTTPSFetcher and LocalFetcher fails to sanitize URI paths, allowing for arbitrary file reads via file:// or writing cached files outside the intended directory.

Impact: > These vulnerabilities can be chained to exfiltrate sensitive cloud credentials or compromise CI/CD environments.

Reproduction: > Please see the attached poc_ssrf_and_path_traversal.py and terminal_output.txt. 13 exploit vectors have been verified locally.

compliance-trestle_audit_2026-03-30.pdf poc_ssrf_and_path_traversal.py terminal_output.txt

Affected Packages

2 total 2 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIcompliance-trestle4.0.0&&< 4.0.34.0.3
🐍PyPIcompliance-trestleall versions3.12.2

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for compliance-trestle. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update compliance-trestle to 4.0.3 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-w76h-q7c6-jpjp is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-w76h-q7c6-jpjp is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-w76h-q7c6-jpjp. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

A source code audit led to the discovery of three significant security vulnerabilities in the trestle/core/remote/cache.py module. **Finding 1 (Critical): SSRF (CWE-918)** The HTTPSFetcher._do_fetch() method passes a user-supplied URL directly to requests.get() without validation. This allows an attacker to perform Server-Side Request Forgery, targeting internal services or cloud metadata endpoints (e.g., 169.254.169.254). Per [rule 4.2.11 of the CVE CNA rules](https://www.cve.org/ResourcesSupport/AllResources/CNARules#section_4-2_CVE_ID_Assignment) Finding 1 will be addressed in this adviso
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-w76h-q7c6-jpjp in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-w76h-q7c6-jpjp across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.

GHSA-w76h-q7c6-jpjp: compliance-trestle… | O3 Security