Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

CVE-2026-46345 — compliance-trestle

HIGHFix: oscal-compass/compliance-trestle@247fcce

CVE-2026-46345 is a high-severity (CVSS 8.4) Path Traversal vulnerability in compliance-trestle. A fix is available for compliance-trestle — see the affected versions and patch details below.

compliance-trestle - jinja has an Arbitrary File Write via Path Traversal

Also known asGHSA-4q5v-7g7x-j79wPYSEC-2026-2423
Published
Updated
Affected
2 pkgs
Patched
2 / 2
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Oct 9, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.2%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs10th percentile — riskier than 10% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.23%0.47%0.70%0.2%0.2%0.2%Sep 26Oct 26Oct 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

CVE-2026-46345 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 384,993 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.

Real-World Exposure

2 pkgs affected
🐍compliance-trestle🐍compliance-trestle

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Relevant Products/Components:

  • trestle/core/commands/author/jinja.py
  • trestle author jinja

Detailed Description:

The -o/--output argument in trestle author jinja allows writing files outside the intended workspace.

The application does not properly validate:

  • ../
  • ..\
  • absolute paths

This allows arbitrary file write to attacker-controlled locations.

Vulnerable code:

output_file = trestle_root / r_output_file

An attacker can overwrite files such as:

  • .github/workflows/*.yml
  • .git/hooks/*
  • user writable config files

This can lead to CI/CD compromise or local code execution.


Steps To Reproduce:

  1. Clone the repository:
git clone https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle.git
cd compliance-trestle
  1. Create template:
echo "hello" > template.j2
  1. Run:
trestle author jinja -i template.j2 -o "subdir\..\..\..\..\..\poc.txt"
  1. Observe:
dir E:\poc.txt

The file is written outside the repository workspace.


Browsers Verified In:

Not browser related.

Tested on:

  • Windows 11
  • Python 3.13

Supporting Material/References:

Affected file:

trestle/core/commands/author/jinja.py

Successfully verified:

  • directory traversal using ../
  • Windows traversal using ..\
  • arbitrary file write outside workspace

Access Vector Required for Exploitation:

Local


Vulnerability Exists in Default Configuration?:

Yes


Is the exploitation trivial or does it involve a multi-step process that may depend on user/victim interaction?:

Trivial. Single command execution.


Exploitation Requires Authentication?:

No


Under what privileges does the vulnerable service or component run?:

Runs with privileges of the user executing the trestle command.

Impact

An attacker can write files outside the intended workspace directory and overwrite sensitive files writable by the current user.

Possible impacts include:

  • overwriting .github/workflows/*.yml to execute attacker-controlled GitHub Actions workflows
  • overwriting .git/hooks/* for local code execution
  • modifying user configuration files such as .bashrc
  • tampering with repository files and generated compliance artifacts

In CI/CD environments, this may result in execution of attacker-controlled commands on build runners.

Affected Packages

2 total 2 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIcompliance-trestle≥ 4.0.0&&< 4.0.34.0.3pip install --upgrade 'compliance-trestle==4.0.3'
🐍PyPIcompliance-trestleall versions3.12.2pip install --upgrade 'compliance-trestle==3.12.2'

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for compliance-trestle, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update compliance-trestle to 4.0.3 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-46345 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Resolve every user-supplied path to its canonical form and reject anything that escapes the intended directory, and run the component under an account that has no read or write access outside the directory it legitimately serves.

Frequently Asked Questions

**Relevant Products/Components:** * `trestle/core/commands/author/jinja.py` * `trestle author jinja` --- ## Detailed Description: The `-o/--output` argument in `trestle author jinja` allows writing files outside the intended workspace. The application does not properly validate: * `../` * `..\` * absolute paths This allows arbitrary file write to attacker-controlled locations. Vulnerable code: ```python output_file = trestle_root / r_output_file ``` An attacker can overwrite files such as: * `.github/workflows/*.yml` * `.git/hooks/*` * user writable config files This can lead to CI
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-46345 in your dependencies?

Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2026-46345: compliance — Fixed in 4.0.3