GHSA-vxr8-fq34-vvx9
DOMPurify: Trusted Types policy survives `clearConfig()` and can poison later `RETURN_TRUSTED_TYPE` output
Blast Radius
dompurifyReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects npm packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Impact
A DOMPurify instance that is reused across trust boundaries can stay bound to a previously supplied TRUSTED_TYPES_POLICY even after clearConfig() is called. A later caller that requests RETURN_TRUSTED_TYPE receives a TrustedHTML object created by the old policy, not by a clean default configuration.
If the old policy is unsafe or controlled by a less-trusted integration, this turns a later "default" sanitize call into script execution at a Trusted Types sink. TRUSTED_TYPES_POLICY: null on the later call also does not clear the retained policy.
dompurify-trusted-types-policy-survives-clearconfig-poc.js
Affected version
Tested against DOMPurify 3.4.8, repository commit 825e617753ac1169306a542d3174a77f717a0cf6.
Root cause
_parseConfig() overwrites trustedTypesPolicy when cfg.TRUSTED_TYPES_POLICY is truthy, but the default/null path only initializes the internal policy when trustedTypesPolicy === undefined. Once a custom policy has been set, later default config parsing leaves it in place.
Relevant code:
src/purify.ts:786-812accepts and storescfg.TRUSTED_TYPES_POLICY.src/purify.ts:813-832does not reset an existing policy when config has no policy or hasTRUSTED_TYPES_POLICY: null.src/purify.ts:2123-2125signs the final serialized HTML with the retained policy whenRETURN_TRUSTED_TYPEis true.src/purify.ts:2133-2136clearConfig()only clearsCONFIGandSET_CONFIG; it does not resettrustedTypesPolicyoremptyHTML.
Local PoC
Run from the DOMPurify checkout, or set DOMPURIFY_REPO:
node /home/dompurify-trusted-types-policy-survives-clearconfig-poc.js
Observed output:
{
"result": {
"baseline": "<b>baseline</b>",
"duringPolicy": "<img src=x onerror=alert(\"TT_POLICY_SURVIVED_CLEARCONFIG\")>",
"afterClearString": "<img src=\"x\">",
"afterClearTrustedType": "[object TrustedHTML]",
"afterClearTrusted": "<img src=x onerror=alert(\"TT_POLICY_SURVIVED_CLEARCONFIG\")>",
"afterNullTrusted": "<img src=x onerror=alert(\"TT_POLICY_SURVIVED_CLEARCONFIG\")>",
"mountedHTML": "<img src=\"x\" onerror=\"alert("TT_POLICY_SURVIVED_CLEARCONFIG")\">"
},
"dialogs": [
"TT_POLICY_SURVIVED_CLEARCONFIG"
]
}
The important part is the split behavior after cleanup:
purify.clearConfig(); purify.sanitize(...);returns a normal sanitized string (<img src="x">), because the later call is not asking for a Trusted Type.purify.clearConfig(); purify.sanitize(..., { RETURN_TRUSTED_TYPE: true });still uses the old policy and returns attacker-controlledTrustedHTML.- Passing
{ TRUSTED_TYPES_POLICY: null, RETURN_TRUSTED_TYPE: true }also still returns attacker-controlledTrustedHTML.
Preconditions
This is a shared-instance state contamination issue. It matters when one DOMPurify instance is reused by multiple integrations, plugins, request handlers, or components with different trust levels, and a cleanup step relies on clearConfig() to restore safe defaults.
This is not a default string-input bypass. An attacker must be able to influence a prior TRUSTED_TYPES_POLICY on the reused instance, or a less-trusted integration must have installed an unsafe policy.
Severity
impact is XSS at a Trusted Types sink in applications that reuse a DOMPurify instance across trust boundaries. Attack complexity is high because exploitation depends on prior policy injection or a less-trusted integration and a later RETURN_TRUSTED_TYPE sink.
Suggested fix
Make clearConfig() reset Trusted Types state as part of restoring defaults, or have _parseConfig() explicitly clear trustedTypesPolicy and emptyHTML when TRUSTED_TYPES_POLICY: null is supplied.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | dompurify | all versions | 3.4.9 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for dompurify. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update dompurify to 3.4.9 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-vxr8-fq34-vvx9 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-vxr8-fq34-vvx9 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-vxr8-fq34-vvx9. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-vxr8-fq34-vvx9 in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-vxr8-fq34-vvx9 across npm dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.