Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

GHSA-vmjw-c2vp-p33c

MEDIUMFix: tensorflow/tensorflow@3a73627

GHSA-vmjw-c2vp-p33c is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.5) CWE-681 vulnerability in tensorflow. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-vmjw-c2vp-p33c is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

Crash in NMS ops caused by integer conversion to unsigned

Also known asBIT-tensorflow-2021-37669CVE-2021-37669PYSEC-2021-291PYSEC-2021-582PYSEC-2021-780
Published
Aug 25, 2021
Updated
Jul 8, 2026
Affected
9 pkgs
Patched
9 / 9
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Jul 8, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Real-World Exposure

9 pkgs affected
🐍tensorflow🐍tensorflow🐍tensorflow🐍tensorflow-cpu🐍tensorflow-cpu🐍tensorflow-cpu🐍tensorflow-gpu🐍tensorflow-gpu+1 more

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Impact

An attacker can cause denial of service in applications serving models using tf.raw_ops.NonMaxSuppressionV5 by triggering a division by 0:

import tensorflow as tf

tf.raw_ops.NonMaxSuppressionV5(
  boxes=[[0.1,0.1,0.1,0.1],[0.2,0.2,0.2,0.2],[0.3,0.3,0.3,0.3]],
  scores=[1.0,2.0,3.0],
  max_output_size=-1,
  iou_threshold=0.5,
  score_threshold=0.5,
  soft_nms_sigma=1.0,
  pad_to_max_output_size=True)

The implementation uses a user controlled argument to resize a std::vector:

  const int output_size = max_output_size.scalar<int>()();
  // ...
  std::vector<int> selected;
  // ...
  if (pad_to_max_output_size) {
    selected.resize(output_size, 0);
    // ...
  }

However, as std::vector::resize takes the size argument as a size_t and output_size is an int, there is an implicit conversion to usigned. If the attacker supplies a negative value, this conversion results in a crash.

A similar issue occurs in CombinedNonMaxSuppression:

import tensorflow as tf

tf.raw_ops.NonMaxSuppressionV5(
  boxes=[[[[0.1,0.1,0.1,0.1],[0.2,0.2,0.2,0.2],[0.3,0.3,0.3,0.3]],[[0.1,0.1,0.1,0.1],[0.2,0.2,0.2,0.2],[0.3,0.3,0.3,0.3]],[[0.1,0.1,0.1,0.1],[0.2,0.2,0.2,0.2],[0.3,0.3,0.3,0.3]]]],
  scores=[[[1.0,2.0,3.0],[1.0,2.0,3.0],[1.0,2.0,3.0]]],
  max_output_size_per_class=-1,
  max_total_size=10,
  iou_threshold=score_threshold=0.5,
  pad_per_class=True,
  clip_boxes=True)

Patches

We have patched the issue in GitHub commit 3a7362750d5c372420aa8f0caf7bf5b5c3d0f52d and commit b5cdbf12ffcaaffecf98f22a6be5a64bb96e4f58.

The fix will be included in TensorFlow 2.6.0. We will also cherrypick this commit on TensorFlow 2.5.1, TensorFlow 2.4.3, and TensorFlow 2.3.4, as these are also affected and still in supported range.

For more information

Please consult our security guide for more information regarding the security model and how to contact us with issues and questions.

Attribution

This vulnerability has been reported by members of the Aivul Team from Qihoo 360.

Affected Packages

9 total 9 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPItensorflowall versions2.3.4
🐍PyPItensorflow2.4.0&&< 2.4.32.4.3
🐍PyPItensorflow2.5.0&&< 2.5.12.5.1
🐍PyPItensorflow-cpuall versions2.3.4
🐍PyPItensorflow-cpu2.4.0&&< 2.4.32.4.3
🐍PyPItensorflow-cpu2.5.0&&< 2.5.12.5.1

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for tensorflow. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update tensorflow to 2.3.4 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-vmjw-c2vp-p33c is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-vmjw-c2vp-p33c is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-vmjw-c2vp-p33c. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact An attacker can cause denial of service in applications serving models using `tf.raw_ops.NonMaxSuppressionV5` by triggering a division by 0: ```python import tensorflow as tf tf.raw_ops.NonMaxSuppressionV5( boxes=[[0.1,0.1,0.1,0.1],[0.2,0.2,0.2,0.2],[0.3,0.3,0.3,0.3]], scores=[1.0,2.0,3.0], max_output_size=-1, iou_threshold=0.5, score_threshold=0.5, soft_nms_sigma=1.0, pad_to_max_output_size=True) ``` The [implementation](https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/460e000de3a83278fb00b61a16d161b1964f15f4/tensorflow/core/kernels/image/non_max_suppression_op.cc#L
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-vmjw-c2vp-p33c in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-vmjw-c2vp-p33c across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.

GHSA-vmjw-c2vp-p33c: Crash in NMS ops… | O3 Security