Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹
🐹 Go
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

GHSA-rpcc-p8xm-rc6p v5

MEDIUM

GHSA-rpcc-p8xm-rc6p is a medium-severity (CVSS 4.8) Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability in github.com/containers/podman/v5. No vendor fix is recorded yet; mitigation options are listed below.

Podman vulnerable to memory-based denial of service

Also known asCVE-2024-3056GO-2024-3042
Published
Aug 2, 2024
Updated
Sep 10, 2026
Affected
5 pkgs
Patched
None yet
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 21, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-rpcc-p8xm-rc6p.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.5%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs44th percentile — riskier than 44% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-rpcc-p8xm-rc6p plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 377,238 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

5 pkgs affected
🐹github.com/containers/podman/v5🐹github.com/containers/podman🐹github.com/containers/podman/v2🐹github.com/containers/podman/v3🐹github.com/containers/podman/v4

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

A flaw was found in Podman. This issue may allow an attacker to create a specially crafted container that, when configured to share the same IPC with at least one other container, can create a large number of IPC resources in /dev/shm. The malicious container will continue to exhaust resources until it is out-of-memory (OOM) killed. While the malicious container's cgroup will be removed, the IPC resources it created are not. Those resources are tied to the IPC namespace that will not be removed until all containers using it are stopped, and one non-malicious container is holding the namespace open. The malicious container is restarted, either automatically or by attacker control, repeating the process and increasing the amount of memory consumed. With a container configured to restart always, such as podman run --restart=always, this can result in a memory-based denial of service of the system.

Affected Packages

5 total
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogithub.com/containers/podman/v5all versionsNo fix
🐹Gogithub.com/containers/podmanall versionsNo fix
🐹Gogithub.com/containers/podman/v2all versionsNo fix
🐹Gogithub.com/containers/podman/v3all versionsNo fix
🐹Gogithub.com/containers/podman/v4all versionsNo fix

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/containers/podman/v5, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Remediation status

    No patched version of github.com/containers/podman/v5 has shipped for GHSA-rpcc-p8xm-rc6p yet. Where your build allows, override or pin the dependency away from the vulnerable range, and apply any maintainer-recommended mitigation.

  3. Mitigate without a patch

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-rpcc-p8xm-rc6p can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-rpcc-p8xm-rc6p. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

A flaw was found in Podman. This issue may allow an attacker to create a specially crafted container that, when configured to share the same IPC with at least one other container, can create a large number of IPC resources in /dev/shm. The malicious container will continue to exhaust resources until it is out-of-memory (OOM) killed. While the malicious container's cgroup will be removed, the IPC resources it created are not. Those resources are tied to the IPC namespace that will not be removed until all containers using it are stopped, and one non-malicious container is holding the namespace
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-rpcc-p8xm-rc6p in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-rpcc-p8xm-rc6p across Go dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

GHSA-rpcc-p8xm-rc6p: v5 DoS (Medium 4.8) | O3 Security