Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍 PyPI

GHSA-r35x-v8p8-xvhw

HIGH

GHSA-r35x-v8p8-xvhw is a high-severity (CVSS 7.8) Improper Input Validation vulnerability in pyp2spec. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-r35x-v8p8-xvhw is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

pyp2spec is Vulnerable to Code Injection

Also known asCVE-2026-42301PYSEC-2026-3003
Published
May 4, 2026
Updated
Jul 13, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed

Blast Radius

1 pkg affected
🐍pyp2spec

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Impact

pyp2spec was writing PyPI package metadata (e.g. the summary field) into the generated spec file without escaping RPM macro directives. When a packager then runs rpmbuild, those directives get evaluated, so a malicious package can execute arbitrary commands on the build machine.

The macro evaluates during spec parsing, not only during the build step. Any rpm tool touching the generated spec triggers execution, rpmbuild -bs, rpmbuild --nobuild, rpm -q --specfile, so the victim doesn't need to commit to a full build before getting compromised. The realistic attack path is typosquatting or targeting a package known to be under Fedora review rather than drive-by publishing. Fedora packagers hold dist-git SSH keys, Koji build credentials, and Bodhi update credentials, so compromise of one packager's workstation enables committing malicious source to dist-git and riding it through the normal build pipeline to end users.

Patches

Patched in 0.14.1.

Workarounds

None

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIpyp2specall versions0.14.1

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for pyp2spec. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update pyp2spec to 0.14.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-r35x-v8p8-xvhw is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-r35x-v8p8-xvhw is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-r35x-v8p8-xvhw. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact pyp2spec was writing PyPI package metadata (e.g. the summary field) into the generated spec file without escaping RPM macro directives. When a packager then runs rpmbuild, those directives get evaluated, so a malicious package can execute arbitrary commands on the build machine. The macro evaluates during spec parsing, not only during the build step. Any rpm tool touching the generated spec triggers execution, `rpmbuild -bs`, `rpmbuild --nobuild`, `rpm -q --specfile`, so the victim doesn't need to commit to a full build before getting compromised. The realistic attack path is typos
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-r35x-v8p8-xvhw in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-r35x-v8p8-xvhw across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.