GHSA-r353-4845-pr5p is a high-severity (CVSS 8.2) CWE-354 vulnerability in simplesamlphp/xml-security. A fix is available for simplesamlphp/xml-security — see the affected versions and patch details below.
simplesamlphp/xml-security: Missing AES-GCM Authentication Tag Validation on Encrypted Nodes Allows for Unauthorized Decryption
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-r353-4845-pr5p.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
GHSA-r353-4845-pr5p plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 377,636 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
simplesamlphp/xml-security🐘simplesamlphp/xml-securityReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
XML nodes encrypted with either aes-128-gcm, aes-192-gcm, or aes-256-gcm lack validation of the authentication tag length. An attacker can use this to brute-force an authentication tag, recover the GHASH key, and decrypt the encrypted nodes. It also allows to forge arbitrary ciphertexts without knowing the encryption key.
Details
When decrypting with either aes-128-gcm, aes-192-gcm, or aes-256-gcm here, the $authTag is set from a substr(), but never has its length validated (it should be validated with something like strlen($authTag) == self::AUTHTAG_LENGTH). For that reason, a shorter than expected data blob will allow for the $authTag to have as short a tag as only one byte (see PHP's documentation).
See this example:
function test($data) {
$ivSize = 12;
$tagSize = 16;
$iv = substr($data, 0, $ivSize);
$data = substr($data, $ivSize);
$offset = 0 - $tagSize;
$tag = substr($data, $offset);
$ct = substr($data, 0, $offset);
echo 'IV: "' . $iv . '"' . PHP_EOL;
echo 'Tag: "' . $tag . '"' . PHP_EOL;
echo 'CT: "' . $ct . '"' . PHP_EOL;
}
/* Outputs:
php > test('myNonceNoncet');
IV: "myNonceNonce"
Tag: "t"
CT: ""
php > test('myNonceNonceta');
IV: "myNonceNonce"
Tag: "ta"
CT: ""
php > test('myNonceNoncetag');
IV: "myNonceNonce"
Tag: "tag"
CT: ""
*/
With a legit ciphertext in hand, this is enough to recover the GHASH key. With that key, any authenticated tags can be computed offline which allows for decryption of the ciphertext and forgery of arbitrary ciphertexts. PoC
- Setup a server expecting XML with an encrypted assertion
-
Run this php script poc.php with php -S 127.0.0.1:8888 (taken from this saml test case)
-
The script expects this private key: sp-private-key.pem.
- Create an XML document with an encrypted assertion (encrypted with aes-256-gcm)
Here is the SAMLResponse used in the video below: saml_response.txt
Note: The steps from 3 to 6 are implemented in this exploit script: nonce_reuse_with_fmt_val_oracle.py. You can run the script with sage -python nonce_reuse_with_fmt_val_oracle.py -s 'url-encoded_and_base64-encoded_samlresponse'
- Take the content of the xenc:CipherValue node and apply the following modifications
-
Base64-decode the content
-
Take the first 12 bytes and save them as the nonce
-
Take the last 16 bytes and save them as the tag
-
Now brute-force the tag of an empty ciphertext
-
Loop through all 256 possible byte values (let's call that byte_tag_attempt)
-
Concatenate together the nonce and the byte_tag_attempt
-
Base64-encode the result
-
Replace the content of the xenc:CipherValue node with this result
-
On http errors 500, we learn that the tag is valid
-
Do the same for the next byte of the tag until all 16 bytes have been brute-forced
-
-
With this new tag and the empty ciphertext, compute the GHASH key (the way to do this has been described in this blog post)
-
Use this GHASH key to compute authentication tags offline for arbitrary ciphertexts
-
Decryption is done by observing XML parsing errors that occur after modifying the ciphertext, those can be seen as http errors 500
Impact
The general impact is:
XML nodes encrypted with AES-GCM can be decrypted by observing parsing differences XML nodes encrypted with AES-GCM can be modified to decrypt to an arbitrary value The GCM internal GHASH key can be recovered
In cases where the encryption key is embedded in the XML and is encrypted with the Service Provider's public key (like often done with SAML), the last two items don't have a big impact. This is because:
With the Service Provider's public key, an arbitrary ciphertext can be created with a known symmetric key The symmetric keys are generated on the fly every time the IdP creates a new SAMLResponse
In any case, secrets that are embedded in the XML, whether coming from an IdP, or from another scheme, can be decrypted.
Important: If static symmetric keys are used, as the GHASH key could have leaked, you must rotate those keys.
References
For additional information on the issue, you can refer to this blog post about the OpenSSL issue and how it can be exploited.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐘Packagist | simplesamlphp/xml-security | ≥ 2.0.0&&< 2.3.1 | 2.3.1composer require simplesamlphp/xml-security:^2.3.1 |
| 🐘Packagist | simplesamlphp/xml-security | all versions | 1.13.9composer require simplesamlphp/xml-security:^1.13.9 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for simplesamlphp/xml-security, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update simplesamlphp/xml-security to 2.3.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-r353-4845-pr5p is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-r353-4845-pr5p can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to GHSA-r353-4845-pr5p. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-r353-4845-pr5p in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds GHSA-r353-4845-pr5p across Packagist dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.