Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
☕
☕ Maven
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

GHSA-qxqf-2mfx-x8jw — core

HIGHFix: veraPDF/veraPDF-library@614ffa4

GHSA-qxqf-2mfx-x8jw is a high-severity (CVSS 8.1) CWE-91 vulnerability in org.verapdf:core. A fix is available for org.verapdf:core — see the affected versions and patch details below.

veraPDF has potential XSLT injection vulnerability when using policy files

Also known asCVE-2024-28109
Published
May 20, 2024
Updated
May 14, 2026
Affected
9 pkgs
Patched
9 / 9
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 24, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-qxqf-2mfx-x8jw.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
1.0%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs62th percentile — riskier than 62% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-qxqf-2mfx-x8jw plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 378,567 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

9 pkgs affected
☕org.verapdf:core☕org.verapdf:core-jakarta☕org.verapdf:core-arlington☕org.verapdf:verapdf-library-arlington☕org.verapdf:verapdf-library☕org.verapdf:verapdf-library-jakarta☕org.verapdf:library-arlington☕org.verapdf:library+1 more

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Maven packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Impact

Executing policy checks using custom schematron files invokes an XSL transformation that may theoretically lead to a remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability.

Patches

This has been patched and users should upgrade to veraPDF v1.24.2

Workarounds

This doesn't affect the standard validation and policy checks functionality, veraPDF's common use cases. Most veraPDF users don't insert any custom XSLT code into policy profiles, which are based on Schematron syntax rather than direct XSL transforms. For users who do, only load custom policy files from sources you trust.

References

Original issue: https://github.com/veraPDF/veraPDF-library/issues/1415

Affected Packages

9 total 9 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
☕Mavenorg.verapdf:coreall versions1.24.2org.verapdf:core:1.24.2
☕Mavenorg.verapdf:core-jakartaall versions1.24.2org.verapdf:core-jakarta:1.24.2
☕Mavenorg.verapdf:core-arlingtonall versions1.25.127org.verapdf:core-arlington:1.25.127
☕Mavenorg.verapdf:verapdf-library-arlingtonall versions1.25.127org.verapdf:verapdf-library-arlington:1.25.127
☕Mavenorg.verapdf:verapdf-libraryall versions1.24.2org.verapdf:verapdf-library:1.24.2
☕Mavenorg.verapdf:verapdf-library-jakartaall versions1.24.2org.verapdf:verapdf-library-jakarta:1.24.2

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for org.verapdf:core, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update org.verapdf:core to 1.24.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-qxqf-2mfx-x8jw is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-qxqf-2mfx-x8jw can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-qxqf-2mfx-x8jw. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact Executing policy checks using custom schematron files invokes an XSL transformation that may theoretically lead to a remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability. ### Patches This has been patched and users should upgrade to veraPDF v1.24.2 ### Workarounds This doesn't affect the standard validation and policy checks functionality, veraPDF's common use cases. Most veraPDF users don't insert any custom XSLT code into policy profiles, which are based on Schematron syntax rather than direct XSL transforms. For users who do, only load custom policy files from sources you trust. ### R
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-qxqf-2mfx-x8jw in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-qxqf-2mfx-x8jw across Maven dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

GHSA-qxqf-2mfx-x8jw: core RCE (High 8.1) | O3 Security