Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐘 Packagist
Not in CISA KEV

GHSA-qq2c-2q8j-jh27

Fix: craftcms/cms@9cc493b

GHSA-qq2c-2q8j-jh27 is a CWE-285 vulnerability in craftcms/cms. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-qq2c-2q8j-jh27 is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

Craft CMS: Authorship spoofing in `entries/save-entry` via pre-check/post-mutation authorization gap

Also known asCVE-2026-50279
Published
Jul 2, 2026
Updated
Jul 2, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Aug 16, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-qq2c-2q8j-jh27.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.2%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs16th percentile — riskier than 16% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐘craftcms/cms

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

EntriesController::actionSaveEntry() performs entry-edit permission checks before request-controlled author changes are applied to the model. The subsequent author mutation path accepts attacker-supplied authors / author parameters and allows the change when the current user is one of the old authors. Because the controller does not re-run authorization after mutating the author list, a low-privileged user can reassign an entry’s authorship to another user without holding the dedicated peer-author-change permission.

Details

The control flow begins in EntriesController.php:249. actionSaveEntry() loads the entry and enforces edit permissions before calling _populateEntryModel():

public function actionSaveEntry(bool $duplicate = false): ?Response
{
    ...
    $entry = $this->_editableEntry($this->request->getBodyParam('entryId'), $siteId);
    ...
    $this->enforceEditEntryPermissions($entry, $duplicate);
    ...
    $this->_populateEntryModel($entry);
    ...
    $success = Craft::$app->getElements()->saveElement($entry);
}

The attacker-controlled source is in EntriesController.php:588:

$entry->setAttributesFromRequest(array_filter([
    'authorIds' => $this->request->getBodyParam('authors') ??
        $this->request->getBodyParam('author') ??
        $entry->getAuthorId() ??
        static::currentUser()->id,
]));

Entry::setAttributesFromRequest() in Entry.php:1124 extracts the new author IDs and applies them if canChangeAuthor() returns true:

if (
    ($authorIds !== null || $authorId !== null) &&
    $this->canChangeAuthor()
) {
    $this->_oldAuthorIds = $oldAuthorIds;
    $this->setAuthorIds($authorIds);
}

canChangeAuthor() at Entry.php:2789 allows the author change when the current user can view peer entries and is already one of the existing authors:

return (
    empty($authorIds) ||
    in_array($user->id, $authorIds) ||
    $user->can("changeAuthorForPeerEntries:$section->uid")
);

After the author list is mutated, the controller does not re-check authorization.

This closes the exploit chain:

  1. External source: authenticated request to entries/save-entry with attacker-controlled authors[].
  2. Trust boundary failure: authorization is checked on the pre-mutation entry state, not on the post-mutation author assignment.
  3. Privileged sink: the author relationship is rewritten in persistent storage.

Preconditions derived from the source:

  1. The attacker is authenticated and can edit entry 345.
  2. The attacker is among the existing authors of entry 345, or otherwise satisfies canChangeAuthor() through the old author set.
  3. The attacker has viewPeerEntries for the section.
  4. User ID 1 exists and can be assigned as an author in that section.

Result:

  1. enforceEditEntryPermissions() succeeds on the original entry state.
  2. _populateEntryModel() reads authors[]=1 from the request body.
  3. setAttributesFromRequest() updates authorIds because canChangeAuthor() is evaluated against the old authorship state.
  4. saveElement() persists the change and _saveAuthors() rewrites the entry-author relation.
  5. Entry 345 now appears authored by user 1.

Impact

This allows low-privileged users to falsify content ownership and alter the authorship of entries without having the dedicated author-management permission. The impact includes corrupted audit trails, misleading notifications, broken approval workflows, and unauthorized reassignment of content responsibility.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐘Packagistcraftcms/cms5.0.0-RC1&&< 5.9.215.9.21

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for craftcms/cms. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update craftcms/cms to 5.9.21 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-qq2c-2q8j-jh27 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-qq2c-2q8j-jh27 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-qq2c-2q8j-jh27. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary `EntriesController::actionSaveEntry()` performs entry-edit permission checks before request-controlled author changes are applied to the model. The subsequent author mutation path accepts attacker-supplied `authors` / `author` parameters and allows the change when the current user is one of the old authors. Because the controller does not re-run authorization after mutating the author list, a low-privileged user can reassign an entry’s authorship to another user without holding the dedicated peer-author-change permission. ### Details The control flow begins in [EntriesController.
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-qq2c-2q8j-jh27 in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-qq2c-2q8j-jh27 across Packagist dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.