GHSA-qmgc-5h2g-mvrw
MEDIUMfilelock Time-of-Check-Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) Symlink Vulnerability in SoftFileLock
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
Blast Radius
filelockReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Vulnerability Summary
Title: Time-of-Check-Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) Symlink Vulnerability in SoftFileLock
Affected Component: filelock package - SoftFileLock class
File: src/filelock/_soft.py lines 17-27
CWE: CWE-362, CWE-367, CWE-59
Description
A TOCTOU race condition vulnerability exists in the SoftFileLock implementation of the filelock package. An attacker with local filesystem access and permission to create symlinks can exploit a race condition between the permission validation and file creation to cause lock operations to fail or behave unexpectedly.
The vulnerability occurs in the _acquire() method between raise_on_not_writable_file() (permission check) and os.open() (file creation). During this race window, an attacker can create a symlink at the lock file path, potentially causing the lock to operate on an unintended target file or leading to denial of service.
Attack Scenario
1. Lock attempts to acquire on /tmp/app.lock
2. Permission validation passes
3. [RACE WINDOW] - Attacker creates: ln -s /tmp/important.txt /tmp/app.lock
4. os.open() tries to create lock file
5. Lock operates on attacker-controlled target file or fails
Impact
What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?
This is a Time-of-Check-Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) race condition vulnerability affecting any application using SoftFileLock for inter-process synchronization.
Affected Users:
- Applications using
filelock.SoftFileLockdirectly - Applications using the fallback
FileLockon systems withoutfcntlsupport (e.g., GraalPy)
Consequences:
- Silent lock acquisition failure - applications may not detect that exclusive resource access is not guaranteed
- Denial of Service - attacker can prevent lock file creation by maintaining symlink
- Resource serialization failures - multiple processes may acquire "locks" simultaneously
- Unintended file operations - lock could operate on attacker-controlled files
CVSS v4.0 Score: 5.6 (Medium) Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AT:L/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Attack Requirements:
- Local filesystem access to the directory containing lock files
- Permission to create symlinks (standard for regular unprivileged users on Unix/Linux)
- Ability to time the symlink creation during the narrow race window
Patches
Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?
Yes, the vulnerability has been patched by adding the O_NOFOLLOW flag to prevent symlink following during lock file creation.
Patched Version: Next release (commit: 255ed068bc85d1ef406e50a135e1459170dd1bf0)
Mitigation Details:
- The
O_NOFOLLOWflag is added conditionally and gracefully degrades on platforms without support - On platforms with
O_NOFOLLOWsupport (most modern systems): symlink attacks are completely prevented - On platforms without
O_NOFOLLOW(e.g., GraalPy): TOCTOU window remains but is documented
Users should:
- Upgrade to the patched version when available
- For critical deployments, consider using
UnixFileLockorWindowsFileLockinstead of the fallbackSoftFileLock
Workarounds
Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?
For users unable to update immediately:
-
Avoid
SoftFileLockin security-sensitive contexts - useUnixFileLockorWindowsFileLockwhen available (these were already patched for CVE-2025-68146) -
Restrict filesystem permissions - prevent untrusted users from creating symlinks in lock file directories:
chmod 700 /path/to/lock/directory -
Use process isolation - isolate untrusted code from lock file paths to prevent symlink creation
-
Monitor lock operations - implement application-level checks to verify lock acquisitions are successful before proceeding with critical operations
References
Are there any links users can visit to find out more?
- Similar Vulnerability: CVE-2025-68146 (TOCTOU vulnerability in UnixFileLock/WindowsFileLock)
- CWE-362 (Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource): https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/362.html
- CWE-367 (Time-of-check Time-of-use Race Condition): https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/367.html
- CWE-59 (Improper Link Resolution Before File Access): https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/59.html
- O_NOFOLLOW documentation: https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/open.2.html
- GitHub Repository: https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock
Reported by: George Tsigourakos (@tsigouris007)
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | filelock | all versions | 3.20.3 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for filelock. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update filelock to 3.20.3 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-qmgc-5h2g-mvrw is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-qmgc-5h2g-mvrw is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-qmgc-5h2g-mvrw. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-qmgc-5h2g-mvrw in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-qmgc-5h2g-mvrw across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.