Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐘 Packagist

GHSA-q747-c74m-69pr

MEDIUM

MantisBT lacks verification when changing a user's email address

Also known asCVE-2025-55155
Published
Nov 3, 2025
Updated
Nov 4, 2025
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.1%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk3th percentile+0.11%
0.00%0.21%0.42%0.64%0.0%0.1%Dec 25Apr 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

1 pkg affected
🐘mantisbt/mantisbt

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

When a user edits their profile to change their e-mail address, the system saves it without validating that it actually belongs to the user.

Impact

This could result in storing an invalid email address, preventing the user from receiving system notifications.

Notifications sent to another person's email address could lead to information disclosure.

Patches

Fixed in 2.27.2.

Workarounds

None

Credits

Thanks to @ncrcs for discovering and reporting the issue.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐘Packagistmantisbt/mantisbtall versions2.27.2

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for mantisbt/mantisbt. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update mantisbt/mantisbt to 2.27.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-q747-c74m-69pr is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-q747-c74m-69pr is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-q747-c74m-69pr. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

When a user edits their profile to change their e-mail address, the system saves it without validating that it actually belongs to the user. ### Impact This could result in storing an invalid email address, preventing the user from receiving system notifications. Notifications sent to another person's email address could lead to information disclosure. ### Patches Fixed in 2.27.2. ### Workarounds None ### Credits Thanks to @ncrcs for discovering and reporting the issue.
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-q747-c74m-69pr in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-q747-c74m-69pr across Packagist dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.