GHSA-q5j5-6p94-4gwc
Fix: qax-os/excelize#2331GHSA-q5j5-6p94-4gwc is a Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability in github.com/xuri/excelize/v2. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-q5j5-6p94-4gwc is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.
Excelize: Streaming GetRows row-bound bypass causes attacker-controlled allocation
Real-World Exposure
github.com/xuri/excelize/v2🐹github.com/xuri/excelizeReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Streaming GetRows row-bound bypass causes attacker-controlled allocation
Summary
Excelize's prior row-bound fix for GHSA-h69g / CVE-2026-54063 protects the checked worksheet parser, but the streaming worksheet reader used by Rows and GetRows does not enforce the same TotalRows bound on the row r attribute. A small XLSX file can set a row number above Excelize's maximum row (1048576) and omit the cell coordinate. GetRows then appends empty rows up to the attacker-controlled row index and returns success.
This was reproduced on the current default branch commit 1213a8bd7c5ab360554603ac5c995ccaf6eb4314 and the latest release tag v2.10.1 (5ad5ab3af0054c55bdce09f1530085600e9f2e45).
Affected package
- Package:
github.com/xuri/excelize/v2 - Tested affected versions: current default branch at
1213a8bd7c5ab360554603ac5c995ccaf6eb4314, and releasev2.10.1 - Fixed version: none known at the time of this report
Impact
An attacker who can provide an XLSX file to an application that calls GetRows can cause memory and CPU usage to scale with an attacker-controlled row number, even though the file itself is tiny. This is an availability issue and appears to be an incomplete coverage variant of the GHSA-h69g row-index allocation class.
In the conservative PoC, row r="2000000" returned a [][]string with length 2,000,000 and allocated about 46 MB. Larger row numbers scale the allocation further.
Root cause
The checked parser path validates row numbers:
excelize.go:checkRowNum(r int)rejects negative rows and rows greater thanTotalRows.excelize.go:checkSheet()callscheckRowNum(r.R)before allocating sheet rows.workSheetReader()invokescheckSheet()/checkRow()before returning a cached worksheet.
The streaming path does not use that checked parser:
rows.go:Rows(sheet)opens an XML decoder directly.Rows.Next()accepts the rowrattribute and assigns it to the iterator's current row without applyingcheckRowNum().Rows.Columns()also assigns rowrto the iterator state without applyingcheckRowNum().GetRows()appends empty row slices for the gap between the previous row and the current row.
Because a cell without an r coordinate can still contain a value, the worksheet can avoid cell-coordinate row validation while still causing GetRows() to materialize rows up to the out-of-range row number.
Minimal worksheet payload
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<worksheet xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/spreadsheetml/2006/main">
<sheetData>
<row r="2000000"><c t="s"><v>0</v></c></row>
</sheetData>
</worksheet>
The workbook also contains a normal sharedStrings.xml with one string (ok).
Reproduction
A minimal Go harness creates the XLSX in memory and calls GetRows("Sheet1"):
rows, err := f.GetRows("Sheet1")
fmt.Println("rows_len:", len(rows))
if len(rows) > 0 {
fmt.Println("last_row:", rows[len(rows)-1])
}
fmt.Printf("returned error: %T %v\n", err, err)
Observed output on current default branch commit 1213a8bd7c5ab360554603ac5c995ccaf6eb4314:
== streaming GetRows row r=2000000 cell without r ==
rows_len: 2000000
last_row: [ok]
returned error: <nil> <nil>
elapsed=21ms alloc_delta=46MB
Observed output on latest release tag v2.10.1:
== streaming GetRows row r=2000000 cell without r ==
rows_len: 2000000
last_row: [ok]
returned error: <nil> <nil>
elapsed=14ms alloc_delta=46MB
A control using the checked parser with row r="1048577" and c r="A1048577" correctly returns row number exceeds maximum limit, confirming this report is about inconsistent enforcement in the streaming path rather than a missing global constant.
Expected behavior
Rows / GetRows should reject row numbers greater than TotalRows with the same error behavior as the checked parser path.
Suggested remediation
- Apply the same row-bound validation in the streaming reader immediately after parsing a row
rattribute. - Preserve and return row parsing errors from
GetRows()instead of silently continuing or returning onlyRows.Close()errors. - Add regression tests for
GetRows()on a worksheet containingrow r="1048577"with a cell value but no cellrcoordinate.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | github.com/xuri/excelize/v2 | all versions | 2.11.0 |
| 🐹Go | github.com/xuri/excelize | all versions | No fix |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/xuri/excelize/v2. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update github.com/xuri/excelize/v2 to 2.11.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-q5j5-6p94-4gwc is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-q5j5-6p94-4gwc is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-q5j5-6p94-4gwc. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-q5j5-6p94-4gwc in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-q5j5-6p94-4gwc across Go dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.