Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦
📦 npm
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

Trigger.dev: Blind SSRF via alert-channel webhookGHSA-q567-cr4x-96w4

MEDIUMFix: triggerdotdev/trigger.dev#4199

GHSA-q567-cr4x-96w4 is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.4) Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in trigger.dev. A fix is available for trigger.dev — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Also known asCVE-2026-114076
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Oct 22, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.2%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs14th percentile — riskier than 14% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-q567-cr4x-96w4 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 394,803 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.

1other npm packages depend on this — each one inherits the vulnerability until it's patched upstream
trigger.devnpm
548Kdownloads / week

Description

Summary

A WEBHOOK alert channel stores a user-supplied url. When an alert fires (deployment/run failure, error groups), the webapp server (alertsWorker -> DeliverAlertService) POSTs the HMAC-signed alert payload to that URL via fetch(webhook.url, ...). The URL is never validated against a host allowlist or private-IP/metadata blocklist (a repo-wide search for 169.254, isPrivate, isLoopback, net.isIP, ssrf returns ZERO hits), and the API route's URL field is just z.string().optional() (no syntax check at all). So an authenticated tenant can point the webhook at internal infrastructure or 169.254.169.254 and the multi-tenant server fetches it.

Affected

apps/webapp, HEAD 5d99457 (current main).

Root cause

  • Source (API route): app/presenters/v3/ApiAlertChannelPresenter.server.ts ApiAlertChannelData.url = z.string().optional() (no host validation); route app/routes/api.v1.projects.$projectRef.alertChannels.ts (PAT-auth).
  • Store: app/v3/services/alerts/createAlertChannel.server.ts persists {url, secret, version} verbatim.
  • Sink: app/v3/services/alerts/deliverAlert.server.ts:973 fetch(webhook.url, {method:"POST", headers:{"x-trigger-signature-hmacsha256":...}, body:rawPayload}); identical at deliverErrorGroupAlert.server.ts:258. Runs inside the webapp process; fetch follows redirects (IMDSv1-via-redirect). No egress guard anywhere.

Runtime PoC (proven on self-host)

Seeded a project + STAGING env + a WEBHOOK channel with url=http://host.docker.internal:7766/... (an internal address from the server's POV) + a DEPLOYING deployment. Triggered via the public API POST /api/v1/deployments/deployment_ssrfpoc/fail -> 200 -> FAILED -> alertsWorker -> the server fetched the listener. Captured:

POST /ssrf-via-webhook HTTP/1.1
host: host.docker.internal:7766
x-trigger-signature-hmacsha256: <redacted>
user-agent: node
{"type":"alert.deployment.failed", ...}

The webapp server (user-agent: node) made an outbound POST to the attacker-chosen internal URL; 169.254.169.254 / any internal host works identically.

Severity

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N ~ Medium. Blind (response not reflected) + POST-only (fixed body = signed alert payload), so it enables internal port/host scanning (delivery success/timing oracle), state-changing POSTs to internal services, and IMDSv1-via-redirect — not arbitrary GET exfiltration. PR:L (authenticated tenant). Egress private-IP/metadata blocking on server-issued webhooks is industry standard; its absence is the defect.

Suggested fix

Validate the webhook URL on create (require http(s), resolve host, reject private/link-local/loopback/metadata ranges) AND re-check at fetch time (re-resolve after redirects or disable redirects / pin to resolved public IP). A shared assertPublicUrl(url) used by createAlertChannel + the two delivery sinks.

Dup

Distinct CWE-918 class from the IDOR advisories. FRESH. (The Grav maintainer independently hardened the same webhook-URL-SSRF class in grav-plugin-api commit dfcc947 on 2026-06-26 — corroborating the class is real and fixable.)

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npmtrigger.devall versions4.5.2npm install trigger.dev@4.5.2

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for trigger.dev, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update trigger.dev to 4.5.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-q567-cr4x-96w4 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Restrict outbound requests from the affected component to an allowlist of hosts, block access to link-local and internal address ranges at the network layer, and require authentication on internal services so a forged request cannot reach them unauthenticated.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary A WEBHOOK alert channel stores a user-supplied `url`. When an alert fires (deployment/run failure, error groups), the webapp server (`alertsWorker` -> `DeliverAlertService`) POSTs the HMAC-signed alert payload to that URL via `fetch(webhook.url, ...)`. The URL is never validated against a host allowlist or private-IP/metadata blocklist (a repo-wide search for `169.254`, `isPrivate`, `isLoopback`, `net.isIP`, `ssrf` returns ZERO hits), and the API route's URL field is just `z.string().optional()` (no syntax check at all). So an authenticated tenant can point the webhook at internal
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-q567-cr4x-96w4 in your dependencies?

Find it across npm, including transitive dependencies.

Trigger.dev: Blind SSRF via alert-channel webhook