Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹
🐹 Go
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

GHSA-pm6v-2h4w-4rp2

HIGH

GHSA-pm6v-2h4w-4rp2 is a high-severity (CVSS 8.5) Path Traversal vulnerability in gogs.io/gogs. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-pm6v-2h4w-4rp2 is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

Gogs: Overwriting critical files results in a denial of service

Also known asCVE-2026-52797GO-2026-5545
Published
Jun 16, 2026
Updated
Jul 21, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Aug 10, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-pm6v-2h4w-4rp2.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.4%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs36th percentile — riskier than 36% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.31%0.63%0.94%0.4%0.4%0.4%Jul 26Aug 26Aug 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-pm6v-2h4w-4rp2 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 0 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐹gogs.io/gogs

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Vulnerability type: Path Traversal Impact: DoS Exploitation prerequisite: authorized user Description: As an authorized user, an intruder can dictate the value which is passed to the git diff command which, together with bypassing the filtering of the passed value, allows the user to bypass the target directory and write the result of the comparison to any arbitrary path. Researcher: Artyom Kulakov (Positive Technologies) Mitigation:

  1. https://github.com/gogs/gogs/blob/b7372b1f32cd0bb40984debfb049e3fc04efaee4/internal/route/repo/editor.go#L307 — on this line, instead of the treePath variable, which comes directly from the user unchanged, we should first filter and then pass the entry variable.
  2. To filter the treePath variable, it is better to use the preexisting pathutil.Clean function instead of path.Clean from the standard Go library.

Exploitation

A Positive Technologies researcher discovered that the user has the ability to preview their changes when editing a file in the repository. The POST /:user/:repo/_preview/:branch/:path_to_file method is responsible for displaying the changes. The problem is how the POST /:user/:repo/_preview/:branch/:path_to_file method processes the value passed to the :path_to_file (see Listing 1).

Listing 1. _preview method processor
func DiffPreviewPost(c *context.Context, f form.EditPreviewDiff) {
	// В treePath попадает значение из :path_to_file
	treePath := c.Repo.TreePath

    // Проверка, что файл существует в репозитории
	entry, err := c.Repo.Commit.TreeEntry(treePath)

	-cut-

	// Значение, полученное от пользователя, передается в функцию в обход фильтра
	diff, err := c.Repo.Repository.GetDiffPreview(c.Repo.BranchName, treePath, f.Content)

	-cut-

The first problem to solve is to make the TreeEntry function think that the value passed in is a file that actually exists in the repository. To do this, we must consider how the TreeEntry function actually makes this decision (see Listing 2).

Listing 2. Path checking and cleaning function
func (t *Tree) TreeEntry(subpath string, opts ...LsTreeOptions) (*TreeEntry, error) {
	
	-cut-
	// Очистка пути от “.” И “/”
	subpath = path.Clean(subpath)
	
	// Разбиение результата на компоненты для их последующей верификации в цикле
	paths := strings.Split(subpath, "/")
	
	-cut-
	
	for i, name := range paths {
		-cut-
	}

Thus, we have a two-level path verification system. At the first stage, extra characters are removed, and at the second stage the resulting path is divided into components, each of which is then checked to be present in the repository. If the TreeEntry function receives a path that has the format of ../../../../../../etc/passwd, it will be transformed into an [.., .., .., .., .., .., etc, passwd] array. The first element of this array will fail further validation and an error will be returned. This problem can be bypassed if the path is directly from the root directory and the corresponding directory hierarchy is present in the repository. A path in the format of /etc/passwd will turn into an [, etc, passwd] array and successfully pass through the filter (see Figure 1).

Figure 1. Example of filter bypass

image The resulting value will be passed unchanged to the GetDiffPreview function, which will execute the git diff /etc/passwd command in the current repository (see Listing 3).

Listing 3. Change comparison function
func (repo *Repository) GetDiffPreview(branch, treePath, content string) (diff *gitutil.Diff, err error) {
	-cut-

	cmd := exec.Command("git", "diff", treePath)
	cmd.Dir = localPath
	cmd.Stderr = os.Stderr

	-cut-
}

However, we will not get any results because such a command will exit early with an error stating that the /etc/passwd is outside the repository boundaries. Because of the specifics of the exec.Command function, there is no way to embed commands or insert spaces to separate the arguments. So, we get one controllable command parameter diff.

Then a second task arises: to select a parameter which allows us to perform malicious actions. Such a parameter is --output=<file>. This option allows the result of the comparison to be written over the passed path. The malicious command looks like this: git diff —output=/data/gogs.db. It overwrites the database file with garbage, which leads to denial of service. Instead of a database file, we could also overwrite a app.ini configuration file.

The final challenge is to bypass the filter in order to pass the payload. This is possible through the use of some peculiarities in the library function path.Clean. By entering a specific sequence of characters, the path.Clean function discards everything that came before this sequence and the sequence itself, leaving only the remains. This behavior is best demonstrated by the following table (see Table 1).

Table 1. Results of the path.Clean function operation
Input dataResult
any ../../targettarget
any1/…/any2/../any3/../targettarget
./targettarget
/../target/target
a/b/../../../../target../../target

So, the payload that will bypass the filters and do as we wish, will look like this: —output=/../data/gogs.db. Attack steps:

  1. Create a data directory in the repository and an empty gogs.db file in that directory.
  2. Send a payload request and check that the code returned is a 200 OK (see Figure 2).
Figure 2. Example of a successful attack

image

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogogs.io/gogsall versions0.14.0

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for gogs.io/gogs. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update gogs.io/gogs to 0.14.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-pm6v-2h4w-4rp2 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-pm6v-2h4w-4rp2 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-pm6v-2h4w-4rp2. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

**Vulnerability type:** Path Traversal **Impact:** DoS **Exploitation prerequisite:** authorized user **Description:** As an authorized user, an intruder can dictate the value which is passed to the `git diff` command which, together with bypassing the filtering of the passed value, allows the user to bypass the target directory and write the result of the comparison to any arbitrary path. **Researcher:** Artyom Kulakov (Positive Technologies) **Mitigation:** 1. https://github.com/gogs/gogs/blob/b7372b1f32cd0bb40984debfb049e3fc04efaee4/internal/route/repo/editor.go#L307 — on this line, instead
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-pm6v-2h4w-4rp2 in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-pm6v-2h4w-4rp2 across Go dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.