NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹
🐹 Go
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

Network Policies & (Clusterwide) Cilium Network Policies with namespace label selectors may unexpectedly select pods with maliciously crafted labelsGHSA-pfhr-pccp-hwmh

MEDIUM

GHSA-pfhr-pccp-hwmh is a medium-severity (CVSS 4.3) vulnerability in github.com/cilium/cilium. A fix is available for github.com/cilium/cilium — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Also known asGO-2022-0959
Published
Updated
Affected
3 pkgs
Patched
3 / 3
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 10, 2026 · OSV.dev, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Real-World Exposure

3 pkgs affected
🐹github.com/cilium/cilium🐹github.com/cilium/cilium🐹github.com/cilium/cilium

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Impact

If a user has Network Policies with namespace selectors selecting labels of namespaces, or (clusterwide) Cilium Network Policies matching on namespace labels, then it is possible for an attacker with Kubernetes pod deploy rights (either directly or indirectly via higher-level APIs such as Deployment, Daemonset etc) to craft additional pod labels such that the pod is selected by another policy that exists rather than the expected policy.

Patches

The problem has been fixed and is available on versions >=1.10.14, >=1.11.8, >=1.12.1

Workarounds

There are no workarounds available.

Acknowledgements

The Cilium community has worked together with members of Isovalent to prepare these mitigations. Special thanks to Sander Mathijssen for not only highlighting the issue but also proposing a resolution.

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, please reach out on Slack.

As usual, if you think you found a related vulnerability, we strongly encourage you to report security vulnerabilities to our private security mailing list: [email protected] - first, before disclosing them in any public forums. This is a private mailing list where only members of the Cilium internal security team are subscribed to, and is treated as top priority.

Affected Packages

3 total 3 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogithub.com/cilium/ciliumall versions1.10.14go get github.com/cilium/cilium@v1.10.14
🐹Gogithub.com/cilium/cilium≥ 1.11.0&&< 1.11.81.11.8go get github.com/cilium/cilium@v1.11.8
🐹Gogithub.com/cilium/cilium≥ 1.12.0&&< 1.12.11.12.1go get github.com/cilium/cilium@v1.12.1

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/cilium/cilium, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update github.com/cilium/cilium to 1.10.14 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-pfhr-pccp-hwmh is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact If a user has Network Policies with namespace selectors selecting labels of namespaces, or (clusterwide) Cilium Network Policies matching on namespace labels, then it is possible for an attacker with Kubernetes pod deploy rights (either directly or indirectly via higher-level APIs such as Deployment, Daemonset etc) to craft additional pod labels such that the pod is selected by another policy that exists rather than the expected policy. ### Patches The problem has been fixed and is available on versions >=1.10.14, >=1.11.8, >=1.12.1 ### Workarounds There are no workarounds ava
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-pfhr-pccp-hwmh in your dependencies?

Find it across Go, including transitive dependencies.

Network Policies & (Clusterwide) Cilium Network Policies…