Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹
🐹 Go
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

GHSA-pcgw-qcv5-h8ch gosaml2

HIGH

GHSA-pcgw-qcv5-h8ch is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) vulnerability in github.com/russellhaering/gosaml2. A fix is available for github.com/russellhaering/gosaml2 — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Unsigned SAML LogoutRequest Acceptance in gosaml2

Also known asGO-2026-4764
Published
Mar 18, 2026
Updated
Sep 10, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 10, 2026 · OSV.dev, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐹github.com/russellhaering/gosaml2

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

The ValidateEncodedLogoutRequestPOST function in gosaml2 accepts completely unsigned SAML LogoutRequest messages even when SkipSignatureValidation is set to false. When validateElementSignature returns dsig.ErrMissingSignature, the code in decode_logout_request.go:60-62 silently falls through to process the unverified XML element instead of rejecting it. An attacker who can reach the SP's Single Logout endpoint can forge a LogoutRequest for any user, terminating their session without possessing the IdP's signing key.

Affected Version

  • Library: github.com/russellhaering/gosaml2
  • Version: All versions up to and including the latest commit on main (as of 2026-03-16)
  • File: decode_logout_request.go, lines 58-69

Vulnerable Code

// decode_logout_request.go:57-69
var requestSignatureValidated bool
if !sp.SkipSignatureValidation {
    el, err = sp.validateElementSignature(el)
    if err == dsig.ErrMissingSignature {
        // Unfortunately we just blew away our Response
        el = doc.Root()                    // <-- BUG: falls through with unsigned element
    } else if err != nil {
        return nil, err
    } else if el == nil {
        return nil, fmt.Errorf("missing transformed logout request")
    } else {
        requestSignatureValidated = true
    }
}

When ErrMissingSignature is returned, the code resets el to the raw document root and continues. The requestSignatureValidated variable remains false, but no error is returned. The unsigned LogoutRequest is unmarshalled and passed to ValidateDecodedLogoutRequest, which performs attribute/issuer checks but does not verify that a signature was present.

Attack Details

PropertyValue
Attack vectorNetwork (HTTP POST to SLO endpoint)
Authentication requiredNone
Payload size~450 bytes (unsigned XML)
User interactionNone
ComplexityLow -- only requires knowledge of the SP's SLO URL and IdP issuer
CVSS estimate7.5 (High) -- Network/Low/None/None, Availability impact

Impact

  • Arbitrary session termination: An attacker can force-logout any user by forging a LogoutRequest with the victim's NameID. This is a targeted denial-of-service.
  • Business disruption: Critical users (executives, admins, operators) can be repeatedly logged out, disrupting access to the application during incidents or time-sensitive operations.
  • Security control bypass: If session termination triggers downstream effects (e.g., revoking tokens, clearing caches), an attacker can weaponize this to force re-authentication flows and potentially intercept them.
  • No cryptographic material needed: The attacker does not need the IdP's private key. The forged request contains zero cryptographic elements.

Suggested Fix

When ErrMissingSignature is returned and SkipSignatureValidation is false, the function should return an error instead of falling through:

// decode_logout_request.go -- fixed version
var requestSignatureValidated bool
if !sp.SkipSignatureValidation {
    el, err = sp.validateElementSignature(el)
    if err == dsig.ErrMissingSignature {
        // FIXED: reject unsigned requests when signature validation is required
        return nil, fmt.Errorf("logout request is not signed: %w", dsig.ErrMissingSignature)
    } else if err != nil {
        return nil, err
    } else if el == nil {
        return nil, fmt.Errorf("missing transformed logout request")
    } else {
        requestSignatureValidated = true
    }
}

This ensures that unsigned LogoutRequest messages are rejected when SkipSignatureValidation is false, matching the behavior that operators expect when they configure signature enforcement.

Attached lab f1_unsigned_logout.zip

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogithub.com/russellhaering/gosaml2all versions0.11.0go get github.com/russellhaering/gosaml2@v0.11.0

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/russellhaering/gosaml2, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update github.com/russellhaering/gosaml2 to 0.11.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-pcgw-qcv5-h8ch is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-pcgw-qcv5-h8ch can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-pcgw-qcv5-h8ch. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary The `ValidateEncodedLogoutRequestPOST` function in gosaml2 accepts completely unsigned SAML `LogoutRequest` messages even when `SkipSignatureValidation` is set to `false`. When `validateElementSignature` returns `dsig.ErrMissingSignature`, the code in `decode_logout_request.go:60-62` silently falls through to process the unverified XML element instead of rejecting it. An attacker who can reach the SP's Single Logout endpoint can forge a `LogoutRequest` for any user, terminating their session without possessing the IdP's signing key. ## Affected Version - **Library**: `github.com/
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-pcgw-qcv5-h8ch in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-pcgw-qcv5-h8ch across Go dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

GHSA-pcgw-qcv5-h8ch: gosaml2 (High 7.5) | O3 Security