Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

GHSA-mw3h-qjxj-6xg9

HIGHFix: thumbor/thumbor@e3ae3e2

GHSA-mw3h-qjxj-6xg9 is a high-severity (CVSS 8.2) CWE-347 vulnerability in thumbor. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-mw3h-qjxj-6xg9 is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

Thumbor has HMAC validation bypass via multiple .replace() calls when removing URL signature

Also known asCVE-2026-53501PYSEC-2026-3620
Published
Jul 31, 2026
Updated
Aug 4, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 14, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-mw3h-qjxj-6xg9.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.2%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs11th percentile — riskier than 11% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.24%0.47%0.71%0.2%0.2%0.2%Aug 26Sep 26Sep 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-mw3h-qjxj-6xg9 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 0 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍thumbor

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

HMAC validation bypass via multiple .replace() calls when removing URL signature

Summary

Thumbor’s HMAC validation can be bypassed due to the use of Python’s .replace() when removing the signature from the URL before validation. Since .replace() removes all occurrences of the substring, an attacker can insert the same signature multiple times in the URL and manipulate the final URL used for validation.

This allows crafting URLs where the validated string differs from the actual requested resource, enabling loading images from unintended domains or paths.

Details

Thumbor signs URLs using HMAC-SHA1 to prevent abuse such as loading arbitrary external images or invoking filters without authorization.

During request validation, Thumbor removes the signature from the request URL before recalculating the HMAC. The relevant code:

url_signature = self.context.request.hash
if url_signature:
    signer = self.context.modules.url_signer(
        self.context.server.security_key
    )

    try:
        quoted_hash = quote(self.context.request.hash)
    except KeyError:
        self._error(400, f"Invalid hash: {self.context.request.hash}")
        return

    url_to_validate = url.replace(
        f"/{self.context.request.hash}/", ""
    ).replace(f"/{quoted_hash}/", "")

    valid = signer.validate(
        unquote(url_signature).encode(), url_to_validate
    )

The issue is that .replace() removes every occurrence of the substring in the URL, not just the first one.

Because the signature itself appears in the URL, an attacker can inject additional copies of the signature elsewhere in the path. When Thumbor performs .replace(), these extra occurrences are also removed, resulting in a different url_to_validate than the original request.

Example

Valid request:

/ddoyYVYUbDf6Po_dzOrBhCDrXLc=/300x200/s3.glbimg.com/v1/.../image.jpg

By injecting the same hash inside the URL:

/ddoyYVYUbDf6Po_dzOrBhCDrXLc=/300x200/s3.glbimg.co/ddoyYVYUbDf6Po_dzOrBhCDrXLc=/m/v1/.../image.jpg

After .replace() removes all occurrences of the hash, the URL used for validation differs from the effective request path. This allows manipulation of the upstream host or path.

Further manipulation is possible due to the second .replace() for the URL-encoded hash (%3D), enabling more precise path manipulation.

Example:

/ddoyYVYUbDf6Po_dzOrBhCDrXLc=/300x200/s3.glbimg.com/ddoyYVYUbDf6Po/ddoyYVYUbDf6Po_dzOrBhCDrXLc%3D/ddoyYVYUbDf6Po/v1/...

Impact

This behavior may allow attackers to:

  • Bypass HMAC URL validation
  • Load images from arbitrary domains
  • Abuse Thumbor deployments as an open proxy / image fetcher
  • Circumvent domain restrictions intended by the signed URL mechanism

Root Cause

Use of .replace() without limiting the number of replacements when removing the signature from the URL.

Since the signature is part of the request path, using a global replacement allows attackers to place additional occurrences of the same substring to influence the validated string.

Suggested Fix

Remove only the first occurrence of the signature or explicitly parse the URL components instead of performing global string replacement.

Example:

url.replace(f"/{self.context.request.hash}/", "", 1)

Alternatively, reconstruct the unsigned URL deterministically from the parsed request components.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIthumborall versions7.8.0

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for thumbor. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update thumbor to 7.8.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-mw3h-qjxj-6xg9 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-mw3h-qjxj-6xg9 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-mw3h-qjxj-6xg9. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

# HMAC validation bypass via multiple `.replace()` calls when removing URL signature ## Summary Thumbor’s HMAC validation can be bypassed due to the use of Python’s `.replace()` when removing the signature from the URL before validation. Since `.replace()` removes **all occurrences** of the substring, an attacker can insert the same signature multiple times in the URL and manipulate the final URL used for validation. This allows crafting URLs where the validated string differs from the actual requested resource, enabling loading images from unintended domains or paths. ## Details Thumbor
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-mw3h-qjxj-6xg9 in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-mw3h-qjxj-6xg9 across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.

GHSA-mw3h-qjxj-6xg9: thumbor (High 8.2) | O3 Security