CVE-2026-53505 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability in thumbor. A fix is available for thumbor — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Thumbor proportion filter allows unbounded post-transform resize leading to remote DoS
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-53505.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
Where this sits among everything scored
Real-World Exposure
thumborReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
Thumbor's filters:proportion(<value>) filter does not enforce an upper bound on <value> and runs in the post-transform phase. An attacker can trigger extremely large resizes (CPU/memory exhaustion) and cause denial of service.
Details
- Filter implementation:
thumbor/filters/proportion.pyvalueis parsed as a float (BaseFilter.DecimalNumber) with no maximum.- The filter computes
new_width = source_width * valueandnew_height = source_height * valueand then callsengine.resize(new_width, new_height).
- Execution phase:
proportionruns in the default POST_TRANSFORM phase (after the main transform pipeline). This means it can effectively bypass request-level size clamping that happens earlier in the request lifecycle (e.g.,MAX_WIDTH/MAX_HEIGHTapplied toreq.width/req.height).
Documentation states the percentage argument should be 0.0 to 1.0 (docs/proportion.rst), but the implementation does not enforce this constraint.
PoC
Preconditions
- The
proportionfilter is enabled (it is enabled by default viaBUILTIN_FILTERS). - Either:
/unsafe/URLs are allowed (ALLOW_UNSAFE_URL=True, common default in some deployments), OR/unsafe/is disabled, and the attacker has a valid signed URL (i.e., the attacker is an authorized user/partner, or otherwise can obtain signed URLs issued by a trusted signing service).
Example request 1 (signed URL)
The following request was used to reproduce the issue and causes severe resource exhaustion:
http://<host>:<port>/<url-sign>/100x100/filters:proportion(10000)/example.jpg
Example request 2 (/unsafe/)
If /unsafe/ is enabled:
http://<host>:<port>/unsafe/100x100/filters:proportion(10000)/example.jpg
Impact
- Remote Denial of Service via CPU and/or memory exhaustion (and potentially process crash / OOM kill).
- Exploitability depends on deployment:
- If
/unsafe/is enabled: unauthenticated remote DoS. - If
/unsafe/is disabled: the attacker needs a valid signed URL (i.e., the attacker can legitimately request signed URLs, or has access to signed URLs issued for other users/partners). If signed URLs are not exposed to untrusted parties, exploitability is reduced but the risk still applies to any party who can generate/use signed URLs.
- If
Suggested remediation
- Enforce a strict bound on the
proportionparameter (e.g.,0.0 < value <= 1.0as documented), or define a safe maximum based on intended semantics.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | thumbor | all versions | 7.8.0pip install --upgrade 'thumbor==7.8.0' |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for thumbor, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update thumbor to 7.8.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-53505 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Cap what an attacker can consume: apply request size, rate and timeout limits in front of the affected component, and run it with memory and CPU limits so exhaustion degrades one worker rather than the whole service.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-53505 in your dependencies?
Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.