\n```\n\n### Details\n\nThere were two vectors. One rendering untrusted string as iframe's `srcdoc` without properly sanitizing","datePublished":"2024-04-17T21:32:57Z","dateModified":"2024-04-18T00:31:04Z","url":"https://o3.security/vulnerability/GHSA-m64q-4jqh-f72f","inLanguage":"en","author":{"@id":"https://o3.security/#organization"},"publisher":{"@id":"https://o3.security/#organization"},"mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://o3.security/vulnerability/GHSA-m64q-4jqh-f72f"},"speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":["h1",".vuln-summary",".vuln-severity",".vuln-mitigation"]},"about":[{"@type":"SoftwareApplication","name":"@excalidraw/excalidraw","applicationCategory":"npm","softwareVersion":"0.16.4"},{"@type":"SoftwareApplication","name":"@excalidraw/excalidraw","applicationCategory":"npm","softwareVersion":"0.17.6"}],"citation":[{"@type":"WebPage","url":"https://github.com/excalidraw/excalidraw/security/advisories/GHSA-m64q-4jqh-f72f"},{"@type":"WebPage","url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-32472"},{"@type":"WebPage","url":"https://github.com/excalidraw/excalidraw/commit/6be752e1b6d776ccfbd3bb9eea17463cb264121d"},{"@type":"WebPage","url":"https://github.com/excalidraw/excalidraw/commit/988f81911ca58e3ca2583e0dd44a954dd00e09d0"}]}\n```\n\n### Details\n\nThere were two vectors. One rendering untrusted string as iframe's `srcdoc` without properly sanitizing","url":"https://o3.security/vulnerability/GHSA-m64q-4jqh-f72f","identifier":"GHSA-m64q-4jqh-f72f","datePublished":"2024-04-17T21:32:57Z","dateModified":"2024-04-18T00:31:04Z","inLanguage":"en","keywords":["GHSA-m64q-4jqh-f72f","MEDIUM severity","CWE-79","CWE-80","CVE","vulnerability","security advisory"],"creator":{"@id":"https://o3.security/#organization"},"isAccessibleForFree":true,"variableMeasured":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"CVSS Base Score","value":6.1,"description":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"Severity","value":"MEDIUM"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"EPSS Percentile","value":42}]}\n```\n\n### Details\n\nThere were two vectors. One rendering untrusted string as iframe's `srcdoc` without properly sanitizing against HTML injection. Second by improperly sanitizing against attribute HTML injection. This in c"}},{"@type":"Question","name":"How severe is GHSA-m64q-4jqh-f72f?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"GHSA-m64q-4jqh-f72f has a CVSS score of 6.1/10, rated MEDIUM. Review your exposure and patch according to your risk tolerance."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Which packages are affected by GHSA-m64q-4jqh-f72f?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"GHSA-m64q-4jqh-f72f affects the following packages: @excalidraw/excalidraw (npm), @excalidraw/excalidraw (npm). Ecosystems affected: npm."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"How do I fix GHSA-m64q-4jqh-f72f?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Update @excalidraw/excalidraw to 0.16.4 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-m64q-4jqh-f72f is resolved across your whole dependency graph."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"How do I detect GHSA-m64q-4jqh-f72f in my npm dependencies?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for @excalidraw/excalidraw. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"How do I mitigate GHSA-m64q-4jqh-f72f if there is no patch (or I can't update yet)?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"How does O3 Security protect against GHSA-m64q-4jqh-f72f?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-m64q-4jqh-f72f is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Is GHSA-m64q-4jqh-f72f actively exploited in the wild?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"No public exploit code has been indexed for GHSA-m64q-4jqh-f72f yet. This does not mean the vulnerability cannot be exploited — absence of public exploits does not imply safety. Apply the recommended fix and use O3 Security to monitor your exposure."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"What is the EPSS score for GHSA-m64q-4jqh-f72f?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"GHSA-m64q-4jqh-f72f has an EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) score of 0.6%, placing it in the 42th percentile of all CVEs. EPSS is maintained by FIRST.org and estimates the probability that a vulnerability will be exploited in the wild within the next 30 days. This score indicates relatively lower exploitation probability, though the CVSS severity should still guide your patching priority."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"What type of vulnerability is GHSA-m64q-4jqh-f72f?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"GHSA-m64q-4jqh-f72f is classified as Cross-site Scripting (XSS) (CWE-79), CWE-80 (CWE-80). These weakness types describe the underlying flaw category, which helps determine the potential impact and the right class of mitigation. This is a high-impact weakness class that often enables remote code execution or data exposure."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"When was GHSA-m64q-4jqh-f72f published, and has it been updated?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"GHSA-m64q-4jqh-f72f was published on April 17, 2024 and was last updated on April 18, 2024. Advisory data evolves as severity scores, affected ranges, and exploit intelligence are revised — always check the latest version of the advisory before acting."}}]}
Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦 npm

GHSA-m64q-4jqh-f72f

MEDIUM

Stored Cross-site Scripting (XSS) in excalidraw's web embed component

Also known asCVE-2024-32472
Published
Apr 17, 2024
Updated
Apr 18, 2024
Affected
2 pkgs
Patched
2 / 2
Exploits
None indexed

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.6%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk42th percentile+0.32%
0.00%0.35%0.71%1.06%0.1%0.6%Dec 25Apr 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

2 pkgs affected
📦@excalidraw/excalidraw📦@excalidraw/excalidraw

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects npm packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

A stored XSS vulnerability in Excalidraw's web embeddable component. This allows arbitrary JavaScript to be run in the context of the domain where the editor is hosted.

Poc

Inserting an embed with the below url (can be copy/pasted onto canvas to insert as embed) will log 42 to the console:

https://gist.github.com/vv=v<script>console.log(42)</script>

Details

There were two vectors. One rendering untrusted string as iframe's srcdoc without properly sanitizing against HTML injection. Second by improperly sanitizing against attribute HTML injection. This in conjunction with allowing allow-same-origin sandbox flag (necessary for several embeds) resulted in the XSS.

Former was fixed by no longer rendering unsafe srcdoc content verbatim, and instead strictly parsing the supplied content and constructing the srcdoc manually. The latter by sanitizing properly.

The allow-same-origin flag is now also set only in cases that require it, following the principle of least privilege.

Impact

This is a cross site scripting vulnerability, for more information, please see: https://portswigger.net/web-security/cross-site-scripting

Two npm @excalidraw/excalidraw stable version releases were affected (0.16.x, 0.17.x), and both are now patched.

Affected Packages

2 total 2 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npm@excalidraw/excalidraw0.16.0&&< 0.16.40.16.4
📦npm@excalidraw/excalidraw0.17.0&&< 0.17.60.17.6

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for @excalidraw/excalidraw. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update @excalidraw/excalidraw to 0.16.4 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-m64q-4jqh-f72f is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-m64q-4jqh-f72f is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-m64q-4jqh-f72f. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary A stored XSS vulnerability in Excalidraw's web embeddable component. This allows arbitrary JavaScript to be run in the context of the domain where the editor is hosted. ### Poc Inserting an embed with the below url (can be copy/pasted onto canvas to insert as embed) will log `42` to the console: ``` https://gist.github.com/vv=v<script>console.log(42)</script> ``` ### Details There were two vectors. One rendering untrusted string as iframe's `srcdoc` without properly sanitizing against HTML injection. Second by improperly sanitizing against attribute HTML injection. This in c
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-m64q-4jqh-f72f in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-m64q-4jqh-f72f across npm dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.

GHSA-m64q-4jqh-f72f: @excalidraw/excalidraw Cross-Site Scriptin… | O3 Security