CVE-2026-34738 is a medium-severity (CVSS 4.3) CWE-285 vulnerability in wwbn/avideo. The records list no fixed version yet; check the vendor advisory below and apply the mitigations in the meantime.
AVideo: Video Publishing Workflow Bypass via Unauthorized overrideStatus Request Parameter
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-34738.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
Where this sits among everything scored
Real-World Exposure
wwbn/avideoReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
AVideo's video processing pipeline accepts an overrideStatus request parameter that allows any uploader to set a video's status to any valid state, including "active" (a). This bypasses the admin-controlled moderation and draft workflows. The setStatus() method validates the status code against a list of known values but does not verify that the caller has permission to set that particular status. As a result, any user with upload permissions can publish videos directly, circumventing content review processes.
Details
At objects/video.php:1055-1056, the video object checks for an overrideStatus parameter in the request and applies it directly:
if (!empty($_REQUEST['overrideStatus'])) {
return $this->setStatus($_REQUEST['overrideStatus']);
}
This code is reached from two entry points:
objects/videoAddNew.json.php:157- when adding a new videoobjects/aVideoEncoder.json.php:114- when processing an encoded video
The setStatus() method validates that the provided status code is one of the recognized values (a, k, i, h, e, x, d, t, u, s, r, f, b, p, c) but does not perform any authorization check. It does not verify whether the calling user has permission to set a video to the requested status.
The relevant status codes include:
a- Active (published and publicly visible)k- Draft (pending review)i- Inactivee- Encodingx- Deletedu- Unlisted
When an admin configures the platform to require moderation (new videos default to draft/pending status), any uploader can bypass this by including overrideStatus=a in their upload request.
Proof of Concept
-
Assume the AVideo instance has moderation enabled (new videos default to draft status
k). -
Upload a video as a regular user, including the
overrideStatusparameter:
curl -b "PHPSESSID=USER_SESSION" \
-X POST "https://your-avideo-instance.com/objects/videoAddNew.json.php" \
-F "title=Bypassed Moderation" \
-F "description=This video skips the review queue" \
-F "videoLink=https://example.com/video.mp4" \
-F "overrideStatus=a"
-
The video is immediately set to active status and is publicly visible, bypassing the admin moderation workflow.
-
Verify the video is publicly accessible:
curl -s "https://your-avideo-instance.com/video/VIDEO_CLEAN_TITLE" | grep -o "<title>.*</title>"
- An uploader can also use this to set other statuses:
# Set a video to "unlisted" even if the platform restricts this
curl -b "PHPSESSID=USER_SESSION" \
-X POST "https://your-avideo-instance.com/objects/videoAddNew.json.php" \
-F "title=Unlisted Video" \
-F "videoLink=https://example.com/video.mp4" \
-F "overrideStatus=u"
Impact
Any user with upload permissions can bypass content moderation by setting videos directly to active status. This undermines the platform's ability to enforce content policies, review uploads before publication, or maintain a moderation queue. On platforms that rely on moderation for legal compliance (e.g., DMCA, age-gated content), this bypass could have regulatory consequences. The same mechanism also allows uploaders to set arbitrary statuses like "unlisted" or "inactive" on their own videos, bypassing platform-level restrictions on these features.
- CWE-285: Improper Authorization
- Severity: Medium
Recommended Fix
Add an authorization check before applying the overrideStatus parameter at objects/video.php:1055:
// objects/video.php:1055
if (!empty($_REQUEST['overrideStatus']) && (User::isAdmin() || Permissions::canAdminVideos())) {
return $this->setStatus($_REQUEST['overrideStatus']);
}
This ensures that only administrators or users with video management permissions can override the video publishing status. Regular uploaders will follow the normal moderation workflow.
Found by aisafe.io
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐘Packagist | wwbn/avideo | all versions | No fix |
Affected Products
avideowwbnDetection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for wwbn/avideo, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Remediation status
The records we use list no patched version of wwbn/avideo for CVE-2026-34738. Check the maintainer's advisory, and where your build allows, override or pin the dependency away from the vulnerable range.
Mitigate without a patch
Put an independent control in front of the weakness: restrict the affected endpoint or interface to trusted networks, require an additional authentication factor or proxy-level check, and invalidate existing sessions and credentials in case the flaw has already been used.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-34738 in your dependencies?
Find it across Packagist, including transitive dependencies.