Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍 PyPI

GHSA-m539-j985-hcr8

MEDIUM

Crash in `max_pool3d` when size argument is 0 or negative

Also known asBIT-tensorflow-2021-41196CVE-2021-41196PYSEC-2021-389PYSEC-2021-606PYSEC-2021-804
Published
Nov 10, 2021
Updated
Mar 13, 2026
Affected
9 pkgs
Patched
9 / 9
Exploits
2 known

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.2%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk14th percentile+0.18%
0.00%0.24%0.49%0.73%0.0%0.2%Dec 25Apr 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

9 pkgs affected
🐍tensorflow🐍tensorflow🐍tensorflow🐍tensorflow-cpu🐍tensorflow-cpu🐍tensorflow-cpu🐍tensorflow-gpu🐍tensorflow-gpu+1 more

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Impact

The Keras pooling layers can trigger a segfault if the size of the pool is 0 or if a dimension is negative:

import tensorflow as tf

pool_size = [2, 2, 0]
layer = tf.keras.layers.MaxPooling3D(strides=1, pool_size=pool_size)
input_tensor = tf.random.uniform([3, 4, 10, 11, 12], dtype=tf.float32)
res = layer(input_tensor)

This is due to the TensorFlow's implementation of pooling operations where the values in the sliding window are not checked to be strictly positive.

Patches

We have patched the issue in GitHub commit 12b1ff82b3f26ff8de17e58703231d5a02ef1b8b (merging #51975).

The fix will be included in TensorFlow 2.7.0. We will also cherrypick this commit on TensorFlow 2.6.1, TensorFlow 2.5.2, and TensorFlow 2.4.4, as these are also affected and still in supported range.

For more information

Please consult our security guide for more information regarding the security model and how to contact us with issues and questions.

Attribution

This vulnerability has been reported externally via a GitHub issue.

Affected Packages

9 total 9 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPItensorflow2.6.0&&< 2.6.12.6.1
🐍PyPItensorflow2.5.0&&< 2.5.22.5.2
🐍PyPItensorflowall versions2.4.4
🐍PyPItensorflow-cpu2.6.0&&< 2.6.12.6.1
🐍PyPItensorflow-cpu2.5.0&&< 2.5.22.5.2
🐍PyPItensorflow-cpuall versions2.4.4
Exploits & PoCs
2

Research use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for tensorflow. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update tensorflow to 2.6.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-m539-j985-hcr8 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-m539-j985-hcr8 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-m539-j985-hcr8. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact The Keras pooling layers can trigger a segfault if the size of the pool is 0 or if a dimension is negative: ```python import tensorflow as tf pool_size = [2, 2, 0] layer = tf.keras.layers.MaxPooling3D(strides=1, pool_size=pool_size) input_tensor = tf.random.uniform([3, 4, 10, 11, 12], dtype=tf.float32) res = layer(input_tensor) ``` This is due to the TensorFlow's implementation of pooling operations where the values in the sliding window are not checked to be strictly positive. ### Patches We have patched the issue in GitHub commit [12b1ff82b3f26ff8de17e58703231d5a02ef1b8b](htt
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-m539-j985-hcr8 in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-m539-j985-hcr8 across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.