Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹
🐹 Go
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

GHSA-jvp4-q659-95mj

HIGH

GHSA-jvp4-q659-95mj is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) CWE-598 vulnerability in github.com/portainer/portainer. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-jvp4-q659-95mj is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

Portainer: JWT accepted in URL query leaks tokens to logs and referers

Also known asCVE-2026-44883GO-2026-5480
Published
May 14, 2026
Updated
Jun 25, 2026
Affected
3 pkgs
Patched
3 / 3
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Aug 10, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-jvp4-q659-95mj.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs24th percentile — riskier than 24% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.27%0.54%0.82%0.1%0.3%0.3%0.3%Jun 26Aug 26Aug 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-jvp4-q659-95mj plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 358,265 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

3 pkgs affected
🐹github.com/portainer/portainer🐹github.com/portainer/portainer🐹github.com/portainer/portainer

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

Portainer's authentication middleware accepts JWT bearer tokens passed as the ?token=<JWT> URL query parameter on any authenticated API endpoint, in addition to the standard Authorization: Bearer header. URLs are recorded in reverse-proxy access logs, browser history, and HTTP Referer headers on outbound navigation, so any JWT passed this way can be harvested by anyone with access to those logs or by an external site the user subsequently visits. A leaked token grants the full privileges of the user it was issued to, until the token expires (default 8 hours, configurable).

The ?token= parameter was used by Portainer's browser-based container attach, exec, and pod shell features, so any user with exec or attach rights on a container was exposed — not only administrators.

Severity

High

Attack complexity is High because exploitation depends on the attacker obtaining a leaked token from a log, referer, or shared URL. Once obtained, a leaked token grants the privileges of the user it was issued to; for administrator tokens this compromises confidentiality, integrity, and availability of Portainer itself and of every Docker/Kubernetes environment it manages — container exec and stack deployment make host-level compromise reachable, so subsequent-system impact is also High.

Affected Versions

Query-parameter token acceptance has existed since JWT authentication was introduced in Portainer.

Fixes are included in the following releases:

BranchFirst vulnerableFixed in
2.33.x (LTS)2.33.02.33.8
2.39.x (LTS)2.39.02.39.2
2.40.x (STS)all prior2.41.0

Portainer releases prior to 2.33.0 are end-of-life and will not receive a fix. Users on EOL versions should upgrade to a supported LTS branch.

Workarounds

Administrators who cannot immediately upgrade can reduce exposure by:

  • Stripping ?token= at the reverse proxy. A rewrite rule in nginx, Traefik, or equivalent that removes the token query parameter before the request reaches Portainer blocks the query-parameter auth path entirely. Container exec and interactive shells rely on the query-parameter token for WebSocket upgrade and will stop working until the patched release is deployed.
  • Auditing existing logs. Search reverse-proxy access logs and application logs for ?token= or &token= occurrences and treat any captured JWT as compromised. Resetting the affected user's password invalidates their sessions; reducing the JWT session timeout in Portainer settings shortens the exposure window for tokens already issued.
  • Administrator hygiene. Do not share Portainer URLs that contain ?token= in chat, email, or tickets, and avoid navigating to external sites from within the Portainer UI on unpatched instances — the Referer header will carry the token.

None of these replace the fix.

Affected Code

Pre-fix, extractBearerToken in api/http/security/bouncer.go read the JWT from the token query parameter before falling back to the Authorization header. The query.Del("token") call scrubs the parameter from r.URL.RawQuery on the way through Portainer, but by that point the original URL has already been recorded by any upstream reverse proxy, access logger, or browser.

func extractBearerToken(r *http.Request) (string, bool) {
    query := r.URL.Query()
    token := query.Get("token")
    if token != "" {
        query.Del("token")
        r.URL.RawQuery = query.Encode()
        return token, true
    }

    tokens, ok := r.Header[jwtTokenHeader]
    if !ok || len(tokens) == 0 {
        return "", false
    }
    // ...
}

The fix removes the query-parameter path entirely. Authenticated requests now carry the JWT via the Authorization header for API clients, or via the portainer_api_key HttpOnly cookie for the browser UI — cookies are sent automatically on same-origin WebSocket upgrade requests, so the browser-based container attach, exec, and pod shell features continue to work without exposing the token in the URL. The WebSocket handlers that previously documented ?token= as a required query parameter have been updated to match.

Impact

  • Token leakage to infrastructure. Intermediate systems that observe the request URL — reverse proxies, load balancers, access logs, WAFs, and corporate network monitoring — capture the full JWT in plaintext.
  • Token leakage via the browser. URLs containing ?token= are recorded in browser history and forwarded in the Referer header on any outbound navigation from the Portainer UI.
  • Account takeover. Anyone with access to a leaked JWT acts as the authenticated user for the remainder of the token's validity, without needing the password. If the leaked token belongs to an administrator, the attacker gains full API access including user management, container exec, and stack deployment.
  • Reach beyond Portainer. Container exec with an administrator JWT reaches the host filesystem of managed environments and can be used to execute commands on those hosts.

Timeline

  • 2026-03-06: Reported via GitHub Security Advisory by scanpwn.
  • 2026-04-14: Fix merged to develop.
  • 2026-04-29: 2.41.0 released.
  • 2026-05-07: 2.39.2-LTS and 2.33.8-LTS released.

Credit

  • scanpwn — identified and reported the query-parameter JWT acceptance and the resulting token-leakage vectors.

Affected Packages

3 total 3 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogithub.com/portainer/portainer2.33.0&&< 2.33.82.33.8
🐹Gogithub.com/portainer/portainer2.39.0&&< 2.39.22.39.2
🐹Gogithub.com/portainer/portainer2.40.0&&< 2.41.02.41.0

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/portainer/portainer. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update github.com/portainer/portainer to 2.33.8 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-jvp4-q659-95mj is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-jvp4-q659-95mj is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-jvp4-q659-95mj. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary Portainer's authentication middleware accepts JWT bearer tokens passed as the `?token=<JWT>` URL query parameter on any authenticated API endpoint, in addition to the standard `Authorization: Bearer` header. URLs are recorded in reverse-proxy access logs, browser history, and HTTP `Referer` headers on outbound navigation, so any JWT passed this way can be harvested by anyone with access to those logs or by an external site the user subsequently visits. A leaked token grants the full privileges of the user it was issued to, until the token expires (default 8 hours, configurable). Th
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-jvp4-q659-95mj in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-jvp4-q659-95mj across Go dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.

GHSA-jvp4-q659-95mj: portainer (High 7.5) | O3 Security